Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

Discussion in 'Official Announcements' started by eduffield, Feb 10, 2015.

  1. Sub-Ether

    Sub-Ether Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1,254
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Party wouldn't have been the same without TaoOfSatoshi :cool:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. oblox

    oblox Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Looks like the site was updated about 5 minutes ago and is now reflecting the v11.1.19 as the latest (coded as InstantX).
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. strix

    strix Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Congrats to all--a glorious day indeed. (Yes, I know; glorious means means radiant, shining, brightly lit. But it still applies.:tongue:)

    FWIW--using Arch Linux, DRK 0.11.1.19 (like all previous versions) compiled flawlessly using the command: yaourt -Syua --devel . Thank you Vertoe for introducing me to Arch.:D
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. LucD88

    LucD88 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Woah, now that's some amazing news to read after a full day of working!

    Congratulations to the DRK team and it's amazing community, milestone after milestone! :D

    All my Masternodes have been updated, experienced no issues at all!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. pbleak

    pbleak Active Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2014
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well done guys. Excellent dev work.
     
  6. Minotaur

    Minotaur Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Trophy Points:
    263
    eduffield

    Hey I had an idea for the masternode network today. What if we created a redundancy mode in which I can run a second backup server to a Masternode in a different location or different VPS or even at home so that if my main masternode gets taken down then the backup masternode takes over. This second masternode does not get paid or anything and can only exists if it is tied to an already existing node so you can't use it to sybil attack the network.

    In reality the servers act as only one masternode in redundancy mode. This has no benefit to the masternode operators other than supporting the network, VPSs expenses are low and if Darkcoin rises in price I think a lot of people would show support by running in redundancy mode, the backup node could even be one of those raspberry pi 2s people have been testing. So we get the best of both worlds, quality masternodes running on high quality data centers and a backup node running in a different location.

    I don't know if its possible, just an idea I had and wanted to present it to you guys, something to think about for the future. If the price of DRK rises a lot we can even require people to run each node with redundancy. You guys can let me know if this makes any sense or if I am completely off. Cheers. :)
     
    • Like Like x 7
  7. Rux

    Rux Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Good one Minotaur

    I would setup that masternode in redundancy mode just to secure masternodes in future... even if i had to pay for 2nd server...

    imagine someone have ability to ddos some % of masternodes.... and cut them off ... these "plan B" masternodes could kick in... this could be handy to make masternodes even more strong
     
  8. crowning

    crowning Well-known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Am I the only one?

    Without reloading the complete blockchain from scratch all my darkcoind (Masternodes, my local one for the Abe, some others, you name it) end sooner or later with "Corrupted block database detected. Do you want to rebuild the block database now?".

    And yes, I did delete peers.dat, called it with --reindex and --upgradewallet and the whole shebang.
    And yes, I do use the official Linux binary, not a self build one.

    They did work fine after the upgrade, were in the correct blockchain etc., everything looked great.

    But stop it, restart it, error....

    Update: darkcoind --reindex fixes the problem...until I stop the daemon and start it again...
     
    #68 crowning, Feb 10, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  9. souptacular

    souptacular Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Updated my MN.

    Wow! Less than a 24 hours after release and already 1/3 of the MN's are on a new version. Nice.
     
  10. AlexMomo

    AlexMomo New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    8

    Happened to me this morning on all my masternodes.
    I had to manually zap the blocks and chainstate folders and peers.dat file. I restarted with --reindex and it solved my problem.
     
  11. souptacular

    souptacular Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    158
    When was the last protocol update? I was able to just restart darkcoind rather than starting my MN from the wallet although it seems like I should have started from the wallet.
     
  12. thelonecrouton

    thelonecrouton Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    283
    My MNs went offline about an hour after I updated and start-many'd them. Start-many'd them again and it seems to have stuck. Didn't -reindex though, and my MN wallet is v60001 or something, so I was probably asking for trouble.
     
  13. TaoOfSatoshi

    TaoOfSatoshi Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    I also had this issue. Re-started with -reindex and it seems to be good. I'll wait and see.
     
  14. Stray

    Stray Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2014
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    48
  15. Stray

    Stray Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2014
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Debug logs now^

    checking inbound connection
    could not locate specified vin from possible list
    error could not find suitable coins!
    Error: Masternode is not in a running status
    Error on ping: Masternode is not in a running status
     
  16. oblox

    oblox Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Did you touch your 1k vin? Matching masternode genkey?
     
  17. tungfa

    tungfa Administrator
    Dash Core Team Foundation Member Masternode Owner/Operator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    Messages:
    8,961
    Likes Received:
    6,735
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    IX just got mentioned in one of my BTC chatgroup here , i explained a little to one guy ... and the rest of the crowed went CRAZY on me ! (for real )
    all stupid haters, but the point is
    we are really onto something here !!!
    the crazier they go , the more their fear (of us) taints their judgment .... the more we are coming on the sidelines and showing them (BTC and Crpto in general ) what is actually possible in creative coding !!
    dam is this exciting

    Congrats again to the team for steady innovation and catapulting us straight to the future

    Edit: top hater was a writer for BitcoinMagazine , he just got kicked out (that NEVER ever happened on Coin Dojo which is a very well respected BTC Chatroom !!! lol )
     
    #77 tungfa, Feb 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 11, 2015
    • Like Like x 3
  18. souptacular

    souptacular Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    158
    I figured out my issue. My masternodeprivkey changed. Here are the steps to fix:

    1. Open wallet with your 1,000 DRK
    2. Unlock wallet
    3. Open Debug Console -> enter "masternode genkey"
    4. Copy that key into your darkcoin.conf and/or masternode.conf files on BOTH your 1000 DRK wallet and your masternode. (line reads masternodeprivkey=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
    For most set-ups, you will change the darkcoin.conf file you use for your 1000 DRK wallet and you will change that value in the darkcoin.conf file you for your masternode
    5. Not sure if this step is neccessary, but I ran:
    ./darkcoind --upgradewallet
    waited a 2 minutes
    ./darkcoind stop,
    ./darkcoind --reindex
    6. After reindexing is done, go back to your Darkcoin wallet with 1000 DRK.
    7. Unlock wallet
    8. Open Debug Console (if it isn't already open) -> type "masternode start YOURWALLETPASSWORD"
    9. You can check if your masternode is enabled by running the command: "./darkcoind masternode list | grep YOURIPADDRESS" (no port is needed)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. moocowmoo

    moocowmoo Bovine Bit-flipper
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2014
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Dash Address:
    XmoocowYfrPKUR6p6M5aJZdVntQe71irCX
    Have run into three bugs when trying to send an outbound IX.

    All cause this dialog to appear:

    [​IMG]

    Bug 1 -- incoming IX is in progress (hung):
    Wallet A sends (IX) 1 drk to wallet B. IX hangs with insufficient signature threshold.
    Wallet B selects different, existing, confirmed inputs, attempts outbound IX.
    Dialog appears.

    Bug 2 -- incoming IX is complete with one block confirmation:
    Wallet A sends (IX) 1 drk to wallet B. IX meets signature threshold. Confs equal 5.
    Block is discovered. Confs equal 6.
    Wallet B selects newly received IX input, attempts outbound IX.
    Dialog appears.

    Bug 3 -- unrelated outbound ix is blocked until incoming ix reaches 6 blocks.
    Also, display count exceeds actual count, confusing when compared to dialog message.
    Wallet A sends (IX) 1 drk to wallet B. IX meets signature threshold. Confs equal 5.
    Wallet B selects different, existing, confirmed inputs, attempts outbound IX.
    Dialog appears.
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 6. Still cant send (dialog appears)
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 7. Still cant send.
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 8. Still cant send.
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 9. Still cant send.
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 10. Still cant send.
    Block is discovered. Conf display shows 6.
    Wallet B can now successfully send non-related-input outbound IX

    Thanks for all your hard work team!
     
    #79 moocowmoo, Feb 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 11, 2015
    • Like Like x 5
  20. Populandum

    Populandum Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    178
    I'd just like to add this minor inconvenience to what moocowmoo said: I was mixing coins the whole time we were sending coins and thus had the wallet unlocked for anonymization only. To send coins I had to unlock it properly, but the wallet then locked itself completely afterwards aborting the mixing. Obviously the wallet should go back to the state it was in before initiating a transaction, not locking itself no matter what state it was in.

    Ninja-edit: Forgot to mention I'm blown away by the fast progress! You guys are the best; made my day!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  21. JGCMiner

    JGCMiner Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe I am confused (someone that knows for sure please help), but doesn't the popup message mean you need 6 POW confirmations for the inputs used in IX. Thus IX 5 + POW 1= 6 confirmations would not be sufficient. I thinks that explains your bug 2 maybe 3 as well depending on what inputs were used. Not sure what is going on with bug 1...
     
    #81 JGCMiner, Feb 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 12, 2015
  22. feeleep

    feeleep New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    13
    coinmine.pl pool updated
     
    • Like Like x 2
  23. moli

    moli Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Still can't InstantX on Mainnet and the transaction fee for DS/IX is quite high if DRK goes up to the moon!

    At first:
    Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 12 of 20 signatures ), broadcast through 21 node(s)
    Date: 2/11/2015 01:16
    To: Wallet 2 XoNGxnL9wqgbJpQQncqtyMGaKhtJMjBZz4
    Debit: -1.00 DRK
    Transaction fee: -0.100011 DRK
    Net amount: -1.100011 DRK

    Transaction ID: 8626f59a782081afc65278c78d12f8e6f5d27c1efcb1eaee132876cd8d6b98c1-000

    Later:
    Status: 4/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)
    Date: 2/11/2015 01:16
    From: unknown
    To: XoNGxnL9wqgbJpQQncqtyMGaKhtJMjBZz4 (own address, label: Wallet 2)
    Credit: 1.00 DRK
    Net amount: +1.00 DRK
    Transaction ID: 8626f59a782081afc65278c78d12f8e6f5d27c1efcb1eaee132876cd8d6b98c1-000

    (But I can't disagree due to the "dead change" issue.... I blame it on Aswan though!)
    jk :D

    EDIT: Second thought: eduffield, when it's a failed IX transaction, could we get our fee money back? Can you make the transaction go without the IX fee somehow? Thanks!
    Scratch this. I just checked and realized DS tx's have this fee regardless IX or not.
     
    #83 moli, Feb 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 11, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  24. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    This is a serious coming of age for the entire DRK codebase... Feature set and clean... There's about a dozen things that make DRK bigger than anything in crypto now... NExt to DRK BTC doesn't even exist... The tech of DRK is so far ahead of BTC and it's clones they can't even see each other anymore...

    Only a flaming retard can argue against DRK vs anything at all...

    On to the dirty testnet testing. ;-)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  25. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    I'm not much for chart watching, but you gotta admit, the is some good Ouija Board Pr0n:

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 6
  26. Light

    Light Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2014
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Masternode getinfo shows 'version': 110119 but wallet version is 60001 and protocol version is 70066. Is this OK or I need to do something?
     
  27. UdjinM6

    UdjinM6 Official Dash Dev
    Dash Core Team Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    3,536
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    run with -upgradewallet once - should take you to 61000
     
    • Like Like x 5
  28. darkstrike420

    darkstrike420 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Good work Evan, team.

    Bye bye Bitcoin, no one needs you.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  29. jsp3cs15

    jsp3cs15 New Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Thanks UdjinM6! I just did this on my masternode and my wallet version is now 61000.

    Cheers!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  30. moli

    moli Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Just got a successful InstantX transaction on Mainnet:

    upload_2015-2-11_7-9-30.png


    Just noticed drk.mn reports 61.09% of Masternodes have updated to this release version.
     
    • Like Like x 3