v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 20, 2014
3,637
3,536
1,183
Somebody on my chat (congratulating the team) is requesting this:

Can i please request for the 64 bit installer to be separated out for Windows
Right now I have to download the entire zip all the time

Any thoughts
(i am a MAC guy so i do not know what that means)
ping flare :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tungfa

tungfa

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
Foundation Member
Masternode Owner/Operator
Apr 9, 2014
8,967
6,739
1,283

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,261
1,837
1,183
Makes sense :)
It seems the 32-bit works better than the 64-bit most of the time. What's the difference between the two, maybe we don't need the 64-bit since we can use the 32-bit installer on a 64-bit system?
 

crowning

Well-known Member
May 29, 2014
1,428
2,005
183
Alpha Centauri Bc
Nice! :)
I was clicking through every download relative thing and just found that there are no hashes in this specific file https://raw.githubusercontent.com/d...arkcoin-0.11.1.19-win32-setup.exe.DIGESTS.txt
Can you fix this too please? :rolleyes:
A while ago flare and me tried to verify our gitian builds and found out that you can't deterministically build the Windows[TM] setup program, the
SHA-256 hashes are different each time.
So it wouldn't make sense to include those.

All the rest (all platforms) are okay.
 

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,287
2,406
1,183
Germany
It seems the 32-bit works better than the 64-bit most of the time. What's the difference between the two, maybe we don't need the 64-bit since we can use the 32-bit installer on a 64-bit system?
Actually there is no need for a 64Bit version at all as the memory footprint is rather small. The Windows 64 version is not mature, i am using always 32Bit version on my Windows system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mastermined

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,261
1,837
1,183
Actually there is no need for a 64Bit version at all as the memory footprint is rather small. The Windows 64 version is not mature, i am using always 32Bit version on my Windows system.
Yeah, same here.
 

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,287
2,406
1,183
Germany
A while ago flare and me tried to verify our gitian builds and found out that you can't deterministically build the Windows[TM] setup program, the
SHA-256 hashes are different each time.
So it wouldn't make sense to include those.

All the rest (all platforms) are okay.
Correct, nevertheless having checksums and signatures for download is a good habit :)
 

TanteStefana

Grizzled Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
2,861
1,854
1,283
Wow, no sleep for you! Good job. Although I'd still like to see BIG messages that any dingbat old lady can understand, I know this needed to go out and I'll have to wait, LOL. STill, under the hood it's very good!
 

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
The whole InstantX smart spork enabled release is understated to the extreme, love it :D:D:D
 

doopalek

New Member
Jul 21, 2014
17
1
3
I get following error when starting Windows local masternode darkcoin-qt.exe 32 bit (0.11.1.19):
Code:
---------------------------
Runaway exception
---------------------------

EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error     
tinyformat: Conversion spec incorrectly terminated by end of string     
C:\darkcoin-qt.exe in Runaway exception     

---------------------------
OK 
---------------------------
However it only happens when I load the masternode config file (that worked fine with 0.11.0.13):
Code:
rpcuser=****
rpcpassword=****
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
listen=0
server=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
addnode=23.23.186.131
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=***
masternodeaddr=***:9999
Any idea?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Talon

New Member
Dec 3, 2014
12
2
3
Is it something to worry about? Used -reindex -zapwallettxes..


2015-02-10 17:21:11 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:11 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:11 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000237395311c99db6121478c32b18398d12deecaa25a5511505765 height=217914 log2_work=60.964101 tx=854570 date=2015-02-10 17:20:33 progress=0.999992
2015-02-10 17:21:11 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-10 17:21:12 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(595baf8a968d0ebaaa7784510557dbb49c413f1f80a0cedb3e32f1d74bd6d9ce, 1), scriptSig=) Height 217924 bestHeight 217914
2015-02-10 17:21:31 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:31 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:31 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000fb7312173757bb8465abaa1b82863c6d54ba25eb56fcd4f4e890 height=217915 log2_work=60.964115 tx=854572 date=2015-02-10 17:21:08 progress=0.999995
2015-02-10 17:21:31 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-10 17:21:33 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(08a23a83233cb982b0b669d08e772ddd088730dae58bb4e8b3dcf9deca3dc1a5, 0), scriptSig=) Height 217925 bestHeight 217915
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sub-Ether

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
Is it something to worry about? Used -reindex -zapwallettxes..


2015-02-10 17:21:11 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:11 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:11 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000237395311c99db6121478c32b18398d12deecaa25a5511505765 height=217914 log2_work=60.964101 tx=854570 date=2015-02-10 17:20:33 progress=0.999992
2015-02-10 17:21:11 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-10 17:21:12 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(595baf8a968d0ebaaa7784510557dbb49c413f1f80a0cedb3e32f1d74bd6d9ce, 1), scriptSig=) Height 217924 bestHeight 217914
2015-02-10 17:21:31 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:31 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:31 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000fb7312173757bb8465abaa1b82863c6d54ba25eb56fcd4f4e890 height=217915 log2_work=60.964115 tx=854572 date=2015-02-10 17:21:08 progress=0.999995
2015-02-10 17:21:31 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-10 17:21:33 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(08a23a83233cb982b0b669d08e772ddd088730dae58bb4e8b3dcf9deca3dc1a5, 0), scriptSig=) Height 217925 bestHeight 217915


Well spotted again-I must be on the right fork, its not in my debug, Talon.

2015-02-10 17:21:04 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(595baf8a968d0ebaaa7784510557dbb49c413f1f80a0cedb3e32f1d74bd6d9ce, 1), scriptSig=) Height 217924 bestHeight 217914
2015-02-10 17:21:16 dseep - Asking source node for missing entry CTxIn(COutPoint(c085e35c3fbbb2944a88eb3afaa55356fa05f35b3eea66bc9ad4b5fd84d7916b, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-02-10 17:21:24 CheckBlock() : skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:24 CheckBlock() : skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-10 17:21:24 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000fb7312173757bb8465abaa1b82863c6d54ba25eb56fcd4f4e890 height=217915 log2_work=60.964115 tx=854572 date=2015-02-10 17:21:08 progress=0.999997
2015-02-10 17:21:24 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-10 17:21:25 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(08a23a83233cb982b0b669d08e772ddd088730dae58bb4e8b3dcf9deca3dc1a5, 0), scriptSig=) Height 217925 bestHeight 217915
2015-02-10 17:21:43 CreateNewLock - New Transaction Lock e0ef92bbbe87ef242dd550d385c69d8590f9fb2f7046564134e29e1ae2c1b263 !
 

r-ando

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 22, 2014
411
250
233
Canada
Simply astounding :) Well done indeed...The Darkcoin team is amazing! Congratulations!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Sub-Ether

KoinKeeper

New Member
Dec 27, 2014
8
1
3
I updated three nodes this morning to 11.1.19 and initially everything was fine. After an hour, all of them stopped showing up in the MN list, so I used my local hot-wallet to start them and they appeared in the MN list. 1 hour and then removed from MN list again. After 15 minutes one of the three came back on the list and 5 minutes later a second one. Again, 1 hour passes and now all are missing from MN list. Third one never came back on the MN list. Update included -reindex and deleted peers.dat.

Why is this happening and how can I fix it?

getinfo shows the same for all of them:

"version" : 110119,
"protocolversion" : 70066,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 217943,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 14,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 6734.94561740,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1421902474,
"keypoolsize" : 1001,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
 

AjM

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 23, 2014
1,334
571
283
Finland
We are excited to announce the release of Darkcoin Core v0.11.1! We have decided to push out InstantX in a separate release because it’s working perfectly on testnet and our other changes to the masternode network will take some time to complete.

This release includes a full implementation of InstantX, a new version of enforcement that works with the updated Bitcoin architecture, huge improvements to Darksend, many more languages supported, lower bandwidth usage and a fully implemented sporking framework.
Nice exciting release!
MN:s updated and are running ok.
Congrats to all testers and the team.
 
B

buster

Guest
Rad! Congrats to the devs and community, exciting times for the Darkcoin.
 

maky

Member
Nov 14, 2014
70
32
58
drk.mn - there is no mn with v11.1.19? Why?

I upload v11.1.19 and is presented as v11.0.14...