Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

v0.11.0.x Core Testing

Discussion in 'Testing' started by eduffield, Jan 1, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. moli

    moli Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Thanks, Evan. Could you also please look at the unresolved issues created on JIRA?

    Thank you.
     
  2. Sub-Ether

    Sub-Ether Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1,254
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Been doing some benchmarks, wallet took 17 mins to update 24 weeks (seemed to get stuck a little on block 89311 but carried on).
    The mixing of 1000 test coins did 19% in 41 minutes,
    and now upto 330 darksend tdrk have been mixed in 2 hours and 32 minutes (so 1 third complete)
    I make that 2.2 tdrk per minute so far, or 3126 tdrk per day.

    Additional:
    881 mixed tdrk in 4 hrs 20 mins, so has speeded up to 3.4 tdrk per minute and 4879 tdrk per day is projected..
     
    #452 Sub-Ether, Jan 10, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 10, 2015
  3. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    the people using v11 on mainnet for testing purposes, will they be doing two pairing mixing with current version (security risk) or does
    it automatically switch to three pairing if the wallet is being used on mainnet ?
     
  4. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    I've gotten plenty of payments with 0.11.0.4 on mainnet... See, it's good that somebody tests this stuff...

    <3 drk.mn

    [​IMG]

    There's even a 0.11.0.3 out there...
     
    #454 camosoul, Jan 10, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 10, 2015
  5. elbereth

    elbereth Active Member
    Dash Support Group

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XkfkHqMnhvQovo7kXQjvnNiFnQhRNZYCsz
    Well payments are not done with a masternode so you test nothing on that front... Try finding a block with a 0.11.0.4 + masternode payment and then your test will be meaningful.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    I'm not mining with it, so point taken.

    The pair inquiry is also valid.

    I'm also no using darksend, so that isn't tested, either...

    DRK has so many things going on, it's more than just loading up a client and getting a green light. Things to do, or not do... Things to test, or not test. So fancy and pretty...

    The test's use thus far is that it did not explode and lose coins or do anything else wildly unpredictable/bad. Whee! Evan said it works on mainnet. It does. Wonder how he knew that...

    All I cared to see was that start-many was finally working. It is. Yay test! I can run nodes now! People who have been holding off on it can run nodes! People who already run nodes and want to enjoy the process of not sucking really bad can now be happy! It is no longer horrible to run many masternodes! Good thing! Happy time! Test good! There might even be people who didn't want to deal with running their own MN who now have the chance since it's like 100 times easier.

    You can use a 0.11.0.4 to fire up 0.10.17.24 nodes if you want it that way. I felt like going all out... Dirty test environment is dirty.

    Is that really such a bad thing?
     
    #456 camosoul, Jan 10, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 10, 2015
  7. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I seem to have a problem using v11 in combination with IPVanish (a VPN service provider), i can only get v11 to work on Testnet by either
    deleting IPVanish or by running IPVanish. If i disconnect IPVanish the UPnP Port Mapping correctly maps my own IP address
    but then throws socket receiver error messages at me preventing any peer connections build up.
    I dont have any peers connection problems using v.0.10.17.24 (or.25) on Mainnet in combination with IPVanish, i'm a bit worried if v11.0 hits Mainnet i will be having the same peer connection problems.

    Debug.log v11.0.4 on Testnet with peer connection problems:

    2015-01-11 13:26:14 ERROR: Read : Failed to open file D:\TestDarkcoinData1\testnet3\peers.dat
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 Invalid or missing peers.dat; recreating
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 Loaded 0 addresses from peers.dat 0ms
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 mapBlockIndex.size() = 90338
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 chainActive.Tip()->nHeight = 90336
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 setKeyPool.size() = 1000
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 mapWallet.size() = 5
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 mapAddressBook.size() = 1
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 AddLocal([2001:0:9d38:6abd:142f:1df1:2685:742b]:19999,1)
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 ext-ip thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 opencon thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 upnp thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 net thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 addcon thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 dnsseed thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 init message: Done loading
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 msghand thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 dumpaddr thread start
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while)
    2015-01-11 13:26:14 Initialization result: 1
    2015-01-11 13:26:15 GetMyExternalIP() received [myownIPaddress] myownIPaddress:0
    2015-01-11 13:26:15 GetMyExternalIP() returned myownIPaddress
    2015-01-11 13:26:15 AddLocal(myownIPaddress:19999,4)
    2015-01-11 13:26:15 ext-ip thread exit
    2015-01-11 13:26:16 UPnP: ExternalIPAddress = myownIPaddress
    2015-01-11 13:26:16 AddLocal(myownIPaddress:19999,3)
    2015-01-11 13:26:19 UPnP Port Mapping successful.
    2015-01-11 13:26:21 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:25 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:26 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:26 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:27 5 addresses found from DNS seeds
    2015-01-11 13:26:27 dnsseed thread exit
    2015-01-11 13:26:28 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:29 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:30 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:31 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:32 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:34 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:34 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:35 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)
    2015-01-11 13:26:37 socket recv error De externe host heeft een verbinding verbroken. (10054)

    Debug.log of v0.10.17.25 on Mainnet : no problems building up peer connections (8 connections)

    2015-01-11 13:51:23 No coin database inconsistencies in last 289 blocks (1704 transactions)
    2015-01-11 13:51:23 block index 21500ms
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 nFileVersion = 101724
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 wallet 313ms
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 nInstantXDepth 1
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 Darksend rounds 4
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 Anonymize Darkcoin Amount 10
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 Loaded 10911 addresses from peers.dat 62ms
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 RandAddSeed() 239668 bytes
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 mapBlockIndex.size() = 196641
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 nBestHeight = 196616
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 setKeyPool.size() = 1000
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 mapWallet.size() = 72
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 mapAddressBook.size() = 4
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 AddLocal([2001:0:9d38:6abd:142f:1df1:2685:742b]:9999,1)
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 dnsseed thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 upnp thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 net thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 addcon thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while)
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 opencon thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 msghand thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 dumpaddr thread start
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 refreshWallet
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 trying connection 82.211.21.16:9999 lastseen=9.0days
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 connected 82.211.21.16:9999
    2015-01-11 13:51:24 send version message: version 70051, blocks=196616, us=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:142f:1df1:2685:742b]:9999, them=82.211.21.16:9999, peer=1
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 Added time data, samples 2, offset -31 (+0 minutes)
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 Moving 82.211.21.16:9999 to tried
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.10.17.25/: version 70051, blocks=201364, us=217.122.139.212:49653, them=82.211.21.16:9999, peer=1
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 Added 1 addresses from 5.45.101.232: 182 tried, 10730 new
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 27 addresses found from DNS seeds
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 dnsseed thread exit
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 send initial getblocks peer=1
    2015-01-11 13:51:25 ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 000000000006223c3f5fd21030586f6cfac2779306429c908afee9b8d7cdea66
    2015-01-11 13:51:26 SetBestChain: new best=000000000010fd370fd869484bea5bb18a289c0bc840095294ba9129306ece5d height=196635 log2_work=60.756438 tx=767665 date=2015-01-02 22:57:58 progress=0.990860
    2015-01-11 13:51:26 received block 000000000017d143bea3c921feab15722541d1720255b72c68ae46a0ee248bf6 peer=1
    2015-01-11 13:51:26 UPnP: ExternalIPAddress = MyownIPaddress
    2015-01-11 13:51:26 AddLocal(MyownIPAddress:9999,3)
    2015-01-11 13:51:28 UPnP Port Mapping successful.
    2015-01-11 13:51:29 connection timeout
    2015-01-11 13:51:29 ERROR: GetMyExternalIP() : connection to 91.198.22.70:80 failed
    2015-01-11 13:51:34 connection timeout
    2015-01-11 13:51:34 ERROR: GetMyExternalIP() : connection to 74.208.43.192:80 failed
    2015-01-11 13:51:33 received block 00000000001263dc4989842b4c82699cc7df584aef66df24dd31c97a98d9722a peer=2
     
    #457 qwizzie, Jan 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 11, 2015
  8. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    did you try to manually add nodes? just asking, the log entry looks like your vpn us cutting the connection. does it work with v10 on testnet? could you check that?
     
  9. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    i tried adding nodes, tried putting exclusions in my firewall for the v11 test directories (firewall controlled by ESET Smart Security btw). i tried v10 on Testnet, exact same problems.
    The problems disappear right after i start IPVanish again, so IPVanish seems to be blocking my Testnet peer connections somehow when its disconnected. Very weird.
    I dont even need to close v11 or v10 on Testnet .. i can just keep the client open, start up IPVanish and it starts building peer connections again. And it doesnt behave like this on Mainnet.. very weird.

    edit 1: i might i have the excusions in my firewall incorrect (was actually adding exclusion for antivirus .. not the firewall) .. making some changes to see if thats it.

    edit 2: yep .. thats it allright. makes perfect sense now, IPVanish overrules Eset's firewall so thats why it could build peer connections when it got activated. I will need to make firewall exclusions for every single test darkcoin-qt.exe
     
    #459 qwizzie, Jan 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 11, 2015
  10. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    Testnet is using different ports (19999) than mainnet (9999) that's why maybe.
     
  11. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Excerpt from debug.log of 0.11.0.4 on mainnet:
    Code:
    2015-01-12 01:02:18 IS DARKSEND MASTER NODE
    2015-01-12 01:02:18 InstantXDepth 1
    2015-01-12 01:02:18 Darksend rounds 2
    2015-01-12 01:02:18 Anonymize Darkcoin Amount 2
    
    Is that saying what it appears to be saying?

    Could probably change the 2 to a 3 and recompile...

    But, I have a hunch there is going to be a few bumps in the version number quite shortly...

    Other aspects of the mixing procedure/depth assure that this doesn't really matter at a whole 1.2% of the network...

    Not a security risk. Proves that such a change by a malicious node is lost in the wash and has no measure-able impact. May as well try to publish your own blockchain where you win every block mined... Same general (non)effect.
     
  12. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    i just merged bitcoin-0.9.4 into darkcoin-0.11

    this includes mainly openssl security fixes as discussed here:
    OpenSSL Compatibility with Client

    full change log:

    https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/pull/106

    waiting for for eduffield and flare to pull the triggers (in that order ;-)
     
    • Like Like x 7
  13. moli

    moli Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Aswan, oblox, anyone, can you trace this tx back to its origin address:

    731fe63009611a07cfaae4b88d0c8608eac74217fc0c38eceb1272f9c7c6484c

    The tx went through 8/9 rounds. The origin address has ending "...sXNx".

    Thanks. :)
     
  14. Aswan

    Aswan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2014
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    73

    With the testnet explorer it's a real pain manually tracking transactions :)

    I had some success tracking it, but didn't chase too far because of the testnet explorer not making it any easier. With the chainz.cryptoid.info explorer it used to be much easier, but they don't have one for testnet.

    Lets call 731fe63009611a07cfaae4b88d0c8608eac74217fc0c38eceb1272f9c7c6484c Tx 0).

    The Txs that lead to your Tx:
    1) 7cb9b81c5befd95f38ea11e21157aeaafcfe9c5981da8c5ff41d071ea28881e0 - sends 400.00000004 DRK to 0)
    2) 41ca6cde66e4ae880a43ffee3eb76f5c50e623f1b9c0d285ba90102f41486daa - sends 90.00000009 DRK to 0)
    3) 0299644af5ae2c275043a1d351e0187197fe315e1c7fffb2420a409649e1accf - sends 0.10000001 DRK to 0)
    4) 9fd30dd2cb0a52fe0834a0c8c93a416237d1f05c5e0b7ad5dc4dd053bd3f6235 - sends 500.00000005 DRK to 0)
    5) 9a559dcb54fb7196b2246951fddf7c7c0072add05f50475ff2f7a57aba97a61b - sends 100.00000001 DRK to 0)

    From there, I found

    6) 10e98361fa86832c03153ba5a672188dc4b62a5e5ebb92b7d0caa5ba3c27cf1d - This transaction sends 778.0712995 DRK to y3r2VcndLy14d6KQEm3ac5u21imVjHN9CW, which is then used in 2) to pay for 0). I know this because the other inputs of 2) are not big enough, leaving only the 778.0712995 DRK output as the funds in question. Also, 2) has an output of 668.07129939 DRK, which is, when substracted from 778.0712995, 110,00000011DRK or 11x 10.00000001. This adds extra evidence those 2 are related.
    What is interesting is, 6) not only leads to 2, but also to 4) and 5).

    Goind further, these 778.0712995 DRK can be traced to 7) 20f3fda7cb19602cf581fc7c2464a34c5372c94ac88e635d9e82c35898520ce7 - In a similar fashion we have no other input that is big enough to be corelated with our output that has already been tied to Molis Tx. It's an input of 883.00000019 DRK in 6), coming from 7).

    Interestingly enough, 6) only has a total input of 936.64272834 DRK. However, it also sends 70 DRK to 4), which is more than the leftover if we substract the big input from the total input. This meant, that the 883.00000019DRK is not only related to 2), but also to 4), adding additional evidence that we are on the right path.
    6) also sends 40 DRK to 5), but this is not enough to exceed the leftover, so we cannot be certain that it's directly coming from the 883.00000019 DRK.

    Looking at the inputs of 7), we can see a total input of 1023.0000015 DRK. Looking for a big input that can be tied to our big output of 883.00000019 DRK does not work this time since the biggest single input is 100.00000001 DRK. However, there is a more than the leftover (which is 139.99999996 DRK) total input from a single Tx, which means that we can be 100% sure that at least some of our funds come from this Tx. Inspecting the Tx, we can see 810.00000018 DRK coming from that Tx, leaving the difference of 73.00000001 DRK we can look for in the other transactions (because of the 1 duff at the end of this amount and the fact that this is not enough to properly DS-Denominate this amount, I think it is highly likely that at least one of the non DS-denominated inputs is related to the 73.00000001 DRK. However, since we already identified where most of the DRK came from, we will persue them first and maybe come back later).

    This leads us to 8) - c9274a038b2253633bbf0b4c8f932a1838b8f4e352a9a5899034e0dcc95e883a - The Tx that send 810.00000018 DRK to 7).

    This is where it gets interesting since the only non-DS-denomination outputs we have are 2x 80.0000008 DRK. This is interesting and means that we can probably count out 16 x 10.00000001 from the input list as not related to out funds (since we didn't have any 80.00000008 DRK inputs in 7). This makes life a bit easier, but still not easy since this time we do not have and other non-DS denominations.

    From here on, one could look for inputs adding up to 810.00000018 DRK coming from as few Transactions as possible, in the best case scenario (for tracking purposes) this would be a single Tx.
    If this does not lead anywhere, one could go back to the 73.00000001 DRK from 7) and keep going or go back to 1) or 3), which we haven't talked about at all.

    As I said, its a real pain using the testnet explorer to manually do all this, which is why I am doing to stop here.

    I conclude:
    Moli said it was an 8 rounds DS Tx.
    1), 2), 3), 4) and 5) therefore belong to DS round 8
    therefore 6) belongs to DS round 7,
    7) belongs to DS round 6
    and 8) belongs to DS round 5.

    We have been able to track a part of the funds over 3 DS rounds to DS round 5 and have then stopped chasing, while also admitting that with 8), things get a little more difficult.
    While not having traced the the funds all the way back to its origin address, we have found out that there are different DS Txs which provide a different level of anonymity. I wish there would be more Txs like 8) and less Txs like 6), which making the linking of the bit input to the big output an easy task.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  15. UdjinM6

    UdjinM6 Official Dash Dev
    Dash Core Team Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    3,536
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Interesting...
    The reason for that behavior of combining smaller denominations during mixing is because of these lines I believe:
    https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/blob/v0.11.0.x/src/wallet.cpp#L2167-L2171
    This should be done in some other way.
     
  16. moli

    moli Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Aswan, thank you for this analysis. This is Testnet with just 2 participants at each round, maybe it's even more difficult to trace on Mainnet with 3 participants?

    At this point, I would really like to see eduffield let us do more than 8 rounds or even unlimited if someone has the time and money to keep running Darksend and paying fees. :)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. bituzer

    bituzer Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2014
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    78
    better try to optimize those 8 rounds first, that seems to be enough work to click through while analyzing
     
  18. thelonecrouton

    thelonecrouton Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    283
    I agree, is someone wants to set DS rounds to 9, or 27, or 99999 then we should let them. It's not like they can't just move everything to a different address and start over, but why make it difficult?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  19. AjM

    AjM Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,332
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    283
    • Like Like x 2
  20. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    looks like Evan is 16 minutes ahead of you guys :)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  21. oblox

    oblox Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Now if only we can default to 8 rounds min.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  22. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    keypass integration got merged. anyone care to test it?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  23. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    okay, i confess that made me use google :)

    keypass integration as in :

    KeePass is a completely open-source password manager that stores all your sensitive data locally ??
    Does this mean it will remember yr passphrase locally ?

    My googling lead me here btw : http://www.howtogeek.com/165882/how...wser-across-your-computers-and-on-your-phone/

    Edit :

    Seems to run with commandline options and also seems to construct an url for KeePass entry to store the wallet passphrase if i read Github correctly ?

    -keepass : Use KeePass 2 integration using KeePassHttp plugin (default: 0)
    -keepassport=<port> Connect to KeePassHttp on port <port> (default: 19455)
    -keepasskey=<key> KeePassHttp key for AES encrypted communication with KeePass
    -keepassid=<name> KeePassHttp id for the established association
    -keepassname=<name> Name to construct url for KeePass entry that stores the wallet passphrase

    Would like some more info about this (first time i heard about KeePass as you can see :)

    I agree with oblox, you guys are putting out a lot of updates today .. good work.
     
    #473 qwizzie, Jan 12, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 12, 2015
  24. oblox

    oblox Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    183
    You guys are crushing it, seriously. Kudos. If it's your goal to make Darkcoin substantially different by its anniversary, you've already succeeded. But by no means slow down or anything. ;)
     
    • Like Like x 3
  25. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    kudos for keypass freynder - he might get back to us with some more detailed information. here are the commit notes:

    here is the keypass discussion thread: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/proposal-keepass-integration.3343/
     
    • Like Like x 3
  26. vertoe

    vertoe Three of Nine

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    now we just need some .5 builds :)
     
  27. flare

    flare Administrator
    Dash Core Team Moderator

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,287
    Likes Received:
    2,406
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Almost done :)
     
    • Like Like x 3
  28. kryptofoo

    kryptofoo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Having 3rd party software manage and transmit wallet passwords sure makes me nervous. Not for myself (I would not use this until it is widely tested by a very large community) but for others who may run into trouble if it is buggy or worse.
     
  29. eduffield

    eduffield Core Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    5,319
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Please Update To v0.11.0.5

    -changed max rounds to 16
    -Fixed masternode payments issue - Masternode payments have been broken on testnet, this patch fixes them. Enforcement will turn on after the network has updated
    -Bitcoin 0.9.4 upstream changes (Vertoe)
    -KeePass integration - Can we get a few people to test this please? (Freynder)
    -Darksend balance shows sendable amount now.
    -Fixed "darksend is disabled" inaccurate message
    -Fixed crashing on -reindex and -gen
    -Fixed darksend balance update on click
    -Fix for random segfaultfrom Masternode::Check
    -Unlock coins when using Darksend reset button

    --------

    CI-builds for v0.11.0.5

    Linux
    https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/v11/darkcoin-0.11.0.5-linux.tar.gz

    Windows & Mac
    - Having some issues, will push up binaries later
     
    • Like Like x 4
  30. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    183
    its by default ''off'' so no need to worry, you have to run commandline options to activate it. But its good to have it tested on Testnet.. see if it works as intended.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.