v0.10.13.x RC5 Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Minotaur

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 7, 2014
452
1,079
263
I am testing a wallet with 45 tDRK amount to anonymize 5tDRK, if someone wants to join with similar amounts it would be great. I am assuming DRK will soon be worth hundreds so smaller wallets will be the norm.
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
My wallet is getting hit with a lot of "Payment to yourself" fees. After Darksending 39 tdrk, the wallet had 0 anon tdrk left. I had Options setting at 100 drk with 6 rounds... Overnight the wallet seemed to stall, this morning I reset the Options to 50 and 4 rounds... Got hit more with "PTY" fees...

upload_2014-9-7_10-54-45.png

And this is what the Coin Control looks right now:

upload_2014-9-7_10-59-37.png

Isn't the money supposed to be split into 10 drk amounts by now for the anonymizing to happen?
(The total balance in the wallet: 901.60349979 DRK
Options: 50 drk to be anonymized, 4 rounds.)
 

Attachments

Tulsene

New Member
Sep 7, 2014
5
2
3
Hello,

I tried 3 times to send coins from the test faucet to XmYpCAeBDZnvVH17GRGr45z1miGDXg7Dd8, the wallet version is
v0.10.13.3-beta, and nothing arrived. Did I miss something or just the test faucet is broken? If someone can sent me some coins to make some test with the wallet plz
 
  • Like
Reactions: flare

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,287
2,406
1,183
Germany
Hello,

I tried 3 times to send coins from the test faucet to XmYpCAeBDZnvVH17GRGr45z1miGDXg7Dd8, the wallet version is
v0.10.13.3-beta, and nothing arrived. Did I miss something or just the test faucet is broken? If someone can sent me some coins to make some test with the wallet plz
XmYpCAeBDZnvVH17GRGr45z1miGDXg7Dd8 is not a testnet address, you have to start your wallet with "-testnet=1" parameter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tulsene

AjM

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 23, 2014
1,335
571
283
Finland
Created issue 58, http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-58

When wallet start anonymizing process, you give your password to unlock it.
Then your wallet is open (unlocked), but you or anybody can send funds
and wallet wont ask your password for this, i think this is VERY dangerous,
because wallet can be unlocked state in several hours, and anybody
can send funds during anon process.

So, i think it would be wise if password is required again if you send funds,
and anon process is on going.
 

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
Yeah, but that would mean you'd need to prompt for password for each round for each denomination. So that mean you'd have to prompt your password 120 million times until all rounds were complete. Better to anon. all the coins needed with safe guard, then close the QT.

You can also go to the bank and make a huge withdrawals in cash and get mugged. Such is life.
 

AjM

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 23, 2014
1,335
571
283
Finland
Yeah, but that would mean you'd need to prompt for password for each round for each denomination. So that mean you'd have to prompt your password 120 million times until all rounds were complete. Better to anon. the coins and close the QT.

You can also go to the bank and make a huge withdrawals in cash and get mugged. Such is life.
No, you give one time your pass when anon begins, and second time if you send money.
 

Tulsene

New Member
Sep 7, 2014
5
2
3
XmYpCAeBDZnvVH17GRGr45z1miGDXg7Dd8 is not a testnet address, you have to start your wallet with "-testnet=1" parameter.
Damned, I'm sorry .... It's seems too easy to just run from binary with ./darkcoin-qt .... it's working now
Thanks a lot for your quick answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: flare

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
No, you give one time your pass when anon begins, and second time if you send money.
Yeah, I do get you. And I think that could be coded in I guess... but fundamentally, the QT does send out nominations to the blockchain, and receives back denominatons, then re-sends them out etc X amounts of time... So basically its the same deal, it need the wallet unlocked.

Please correct me if I'm wrong... but if you send out anon DRKs out while the rounds are happening, that might interrupt the pairing flux. So it could be even worse.

But obviously I do agree that it would be great to have 1 password prompt to start denomination, and a 2nd prompt to manually send out DRKs. Absolutely agree.
 

AjM

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 23, 2014
1,335
571
283
Finland
New wallet, 1000 tDRK, settings: rounds 4 and min anon amount: 5.
DS was idle, sent 100 tDRK non anon funds.
After few minutes coin controls shows over 300, 5 and 1 tDRK denom items, i think 5 x 1 should be right.



EDIT: second pic
 

oblox

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,032
537
183
Good morning. I just woke up. I just set my wallet to the same setting, so far it's at 50% completion, but no splitting into 10 drk amounts. Has your wallet got 50 coins anonymized yet?
At 77%, 78 coins anon bal. I have a few 10 and 1 denominations still in round 2, the rest round 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli

kryptofoo

Member
Jul 21, 2014
114
36
78
Germany
Changing the settings (rounds to use, amt to keep anon, disable darksend) seems wonky. Feels like I always have to restart the client (win32) for any changes to take affect. Ideally this would not be the case, takes some of the polish off the product but oh well.

Also, my 8 rounds of denom 5k tDRk is not making any progress again, I had a burst of darksend action overnight and now stuck at 89%. I have 6 addresses with 500 coins each that are <8 rounds. I guess not enough folks anonymizing large amounts on testnet? If this were mainnet I would feel really uneasy leaving my wallet unlocked for so long while nothing is going on. Is there any way to kick start the darksend proess? I was thinking of send the "stuck" coins to a new address in my wallet, to re-start the process again? At least I might get those blocks of 500 broken into smaller chunks so that they find pairs to mix with. Or does anyone have better advice?
 

oblox

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,032
537
183
At 77%, 78 coins anon bal. I have a few 10 and 1 denominations still in round 2, the rest round 4.
Finished with 117 coins. Going to send to a new address and try 10 at 4 rounds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli

jimbit

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
May 23, 2014
229
103
203
I just updated my MN... but now my console is full of

Code:
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
 

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,287
2,406
1,183
Germany
I just updated my MN... but now my console is full of

Code:
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
relay...
Known issue in .3 version, just log spam. Will be gone in .4
 

Minotaur

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 7, 2014
452
1,079
263
OK I may have an issue but I am not sure. Created new wallet, sent 45tDRK to it, set Darksend to 8 rounds, amount to keep anonymized 5tDRK. The process took long I guess to get the right entries, but it did try. Finally, the system was able to anonymize 2tDRK and showed 100% in the overview, but now I keep getting payments to myself of 0.004tDRK. Why is it still doing this? I would like to understand if this is an issue or not before I post it to Jira, anyone care to explain?

Here is the overview:

Overview issue2.png


Here you can see the transactions:

Transactions issue2.png


Finally, this is coin control:

Coin Control Issue2.png
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
OK I may have an issue but I am not sure. Created new wallet, sent 45tDRK to it, set Darksend to 8 rounds, amount to keep anonymized 5tDRK. The process took long I guess to get the right entries, but it did try. Finally, the system was able to anonymize 2tDRK and showed 100% in the overview, but now I keep getting payments to myself of 0.004tDRK. Why is it still doing this? I would like to understand if this is an issue or not before I post it to Jira, anyone care to explain?

Here is the overview:

View attachment 424


Here you can see the transactions:

View attachment 423


Finally, this is coin control:

View attachment 425
I've had a similar case. I'm thinking of submitting it to JIRA also. Your pictures are quite large, if you can resize them, they would be better looking.
 

GNULinuxGuy

Member
Jul 22, 2014
112
68
78
Dash Address
XjkXfrYTSvdYe4738DtNVX5XfUz7qU9HnY
A couple of days ago I started a fresh instance of darkcoind v0.10.13.3-beta and let it sync (darkcoin.conf set to testnet and darksend disabled). I then executed getaccountaddress to get a fresh address, followed by "setaccount mkn64wqajC4Per8GaQTo7QvvKJCtUt9LHx consolidation" to name it. After that I backed up the wallet.dat and proceeded to send the balance from 12 old test wallets into this new address.

Earlier today I started up darkcoin-qt v0.10.13.3-beta (note GUI not daemon this time) using the backed up wallet.dat and it segfaulted after the initial loading sequences (I believe it was 3 lines of output, unfortunately lost due to all the "relay..." noise). I then started darkcoin-qt again, and it did the initial loading sequences followed by a rescan and then started normally. The really strange thing is I see a "Payment to yourself" at the top of the transactions list that had apparently just occurred (upon the 2nd loading of the GUI):
Code:
Status: 113 confirmations
Date: 7 Sep 2014 13:09
Debit: 0.00 DRK
Credit: 0.00 DRK
Net amount: 0.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023
How is it possible that I apparently paid a mixing fee/collateral payment when darksend has been disabled this entire process? Even more strange it's all 0s and it's being confirmed? For convenience: http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023

Edit: Upon closer inspection the strange transaction actually took place on the 1st run of the GUI client. Early on in the 1st run of the GUI client I see darksend is in fact disabled, but after the blockchain sync stuff it starts trying to do things it shouldn't be and segfaults. I've pasted the last bits logged as well as the segfault line from the kernel below.
Code:
2014-09-07 19:09:22 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 3
2014-09-07 19:09:22 DoAutomaticDenominating: Split up large input (justCollateral 1):
2014-09-07 19:09:22  auto -- nTotalBalance 100000000
2014-09-07 19:09:22  auto-- nTotalOut 0
2014-09-07 19:09:22 keypool added key 1004, size=1001
2014-09-07 19:09:22 keypool reserve 4
2014-09-07 19:09:22 CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=7, nLockTime=0)
  CTxIn(COutPoint(752705ab2910d7f1da3da89a81aef199d20e9c0213d7cf20e6d843ae772a13a2, 0), scriptSig=3045022042c4c24d721bde8c)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.12500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.81049977, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
  CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 50fc5d680781)
keypool keep 4
2014-09-07 19:09:22 AddToWallet 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023  new
2014-09-07 19:09:22 WalletUpdateSpent found spent coin 0.99799977DRK 752705ab2910d7f1da3da89a81aef199d20e9c0213d7cf20e6d843ae772a13a2
2014-09-07 19:09:22 AddToWallet 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023
2014-09-07 19:09:22 Relaying wtx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023
2014-09-07 19:09:22 SplitUpMoney Success: tx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023
2014-09-07 19:09:22 received getdata for: tx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023 peer=5
2014-09-07 19:09:22 received getdata for: tx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023 peer=6
2014-09-07 19:09:22 received getdata for: tx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023 peer=4
2014-09-07 19:09:23 received getdata for: tx 45d7d2aba5e056b9133d560d3607c0f49cd0489147121827811d2479d29d4023 peer=2
2014-09-07 19:09:23 connection timeout
2014-09-07 19:09:23 trying connection 25.201.170.201:19999 lastseen=2.1days
2014-09-07 19:09:24 Flushing wallet.dat
2014-09-07 19:09:24 Flushed wallet.dat 8ms
2014-09-07 19:09:28 connection timeout
2014-09-07 19:09:29 trying connection 58.189.239.123:19999 lastseen=2.0days
2014-09-07 19:09:34 connection timeout
2014-09-07 19:09:34 trying connection 66.90.98.98:19999 lastseen=30.1days
2014-09-07 19:09:39 connection timeout
2014-09-07 19:09:40 trying connection 98.167.250.102:19999 lastseen=0.1days
2014-09-07 19:09:45 connection timeout
2014-09-07 19:09:45 trying connection 107.170.14.192:19999 lastseen=0.1days
2014-09-07 19:09:46 refreshWallet

kernel: [14980319.429818] darkcoin-qt[19703]: segfault at 10 ip 00000000005a1566 sp 00007fff608b3330 error 4 in darkcoin-qt[400000+9a4000]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

acidburn

Active Member
May 26, 2014
467
175
113
That's very odd! I come back on Wednesday so I can join in with testing on Thursday :)
 

Light

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 4, 2014
346
256
233
I think it's 1 drk isn't it?
But when/if the price of 1drk reaches >$1000, the dev team will have to find a solution for the wallet to anonymize less than 1 drk as well
 

Probe

New Member
May 28, 2014
25
3
3
But when/if the price of 1drk reaches >$1000, the dev team will have to find a solution for the wallet to anonymize less than 1 drk as well
Yep, after RC5 darkcoint price can hit 20USD for couple of days . We need denomination under 1 DRK .
 

stonehedge

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jul 31, 2014
696
333
233
Can we have a sticky somewhere with links to latest source and executables? Just had a bit of free time to dig out the latest client and do some testing but after trawling six pages back I've had to go back to doing my day job for a while :sad:
 

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,287
2,406
1,183
Germany
LOL thank you! I feel like the school kid who has been dozing at the back of the class room...
Never mind - i added this some days ago, because qwizzie came up with the same request :)

- for those of us that are dependent of flare's CI builds is it possible to have them added in a sticky post ?
I saw he has a sticky post here : [STICKY] Testnet tools & resources, maybe we can put his latest CI builds
in there as well ? That way it will always be easily accessable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coingun and jimbit
Status
Not open for further replies.