Maybe moli can comment about this to DRK-90 or make new issue (better, gets more attention).I think you're right, there must be a bug in anonymizing small amounts and so far we know anonymizing only 2 drk is not possible, as you saw last night in the IRC channel what we did. I'm just reporting here to let the devs and everyone know. Another participant with 2 clients and I tried to anonymize 2 DRK.
All 3 clients had the same settings: 2 DRK to keep anonymized, 4 rounds.
Here's the result - The other participant said:
[22:33:44] <shlermb> both fresh, both sent 2drk, both set 2drk/4rnds. now show balance: 1.9865, completion: 100%, coin control shows 1drk having 1 round.
[22:33:55] <shlermb> anonymized: 0
At first , my wallet received 1 "Payment to yourself" fee... Then the waiting... After a while Darksend Status said "Disabled", BUT the "Start/Stop" button said "Stop Anonymization", meaning that DS was still on and the anonymization was still going!! Then I clicked on the button, it did not change one way or another, like it was being froze, (Windows wallet, v.10.13.15). I then had to exit the wallet and restarted it. The wallet seemed back to normal, the "Start/Stop" button seemed normal again. I clicked on the button to start DS again, but it did not do anything, still no Denominate fee ever happened, and 0 anon DRK. I saved the screenshot of my wallet:
View attachment 523
Hopefully, eduffield or flare will have time to look into this.
I think newbies are wanting to know how DS works and they start out with just a few Darkcoins, and when they try to anonymize 2 or 3 drk but it doesn't happen, they might think this doesn't work. :sad:
RC5 Launch (MANDATORY UPDATE)
- Thread starter eduffield
- Start date
My opinion about this 'small amount wont denominate and anonymize' is:
it is critical for Darkcoin, because new and average users will test with small amount first,
and because it wont work, DRK:s reputation and user experience is negative.
it is critical for Darkcoin, because new and average users will test with small amount first,
and because it wont work, DRK:s reputation and user experience is negative.
I tried twice to anonymize using only 2 coins, just to see how the process works, and concluded , "It doesn't".
Maybe a message warning users "You may only anonymize minimum of x coins" to avoid such misconceptions.
Maybe a message warning users "You may only anonymize minimum of x coins" to avoid such misconceptions.
Was there any particular reason that denom/anon resolution only went down to 1 and not 0.1? Fees are still 1+ order of magnitude below this.
Client/daemon wise, yes, but compliant-wise for enforcement, the pools need to be paying out 20%. Anything other than 20% is getting rejected. If you follow the pool discussion https://darkcointalk.org/posts/22360/ you'll see that because of one particular pool, we'll never get to the 90% target since they find on average about a quarter of the daily blocks.
If you hit CTRL+F5 you will see elbereth updated colours to help you finding the important number
https://drk.mn/blocks.html
In that case, I suggest we deal with this abuse like so:
After we reach 90% client/daemon wise, we keep checking the blocks, and as soon as nine out of any ten successive blocks are fully compliant, BAM! :tongue:
Ticket DRK-90 was lost when JIRA was updated:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-testing.2245/page-47#post-21474
Maybe Oblox has sent another ticket?
Hm.. Ok. I'll try to submit a ticket from that 2 DRK scenario last night.
Ticket DRK-92 submitted: http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-92
Another test case of 2 DRK was done tonight by shlermb, same negative result, was included in the ticket.
Another test case of 2 DRK was done tonight by shlermb, same negative result, was included in the ticket.
Not sure if you can regenerate a wallet but you can use dumpprivkey/importprivkey commands to dump you key from your old wallet and import them to a new one
Which is no different than sending coins. There isn't a way to keep your address.
Hmm, I'll have to look into that as I was always under the impression that once imported, the old address is essentially dead.
So this means we can compile the 0.12.x branch that includes the full masternode functionality?
Yes. It's in master branch, version tag is not updated yet but i's supposed to be 0.10.13.15...
Thank you! I would love to compile as I like to try to use the compilers for Arch Linux.That's correct, release tag still missing - we'll sort that out today
flare, jira seems to be down (my user was lost anyway), any idea about this one:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-masternode-stopping-with-invalid-private-key-error.2540/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-masternode-stopping-with-invalid-private-key-error.2540/