That's because most of the people that got into crypto early actually believe that basic income is a bad thing and should be avoided, as it inevitably leads to inflation.
It leads to inflation in FIAT money. It doesnt lead to inflation when talking about cryptocurrencies, because the maximum number of cryptocoins remains stable.
That being said, I would like to see at least one crypto that does basic income, but does it right.
There is
ucoin/renamed to duniter/renamed to G1. They have a
remarcable theory regarding basic income, based on mathematics. Unfortunately the duniter community leaders
hate governance. I am banned there for one year (until 17 jun 2018), because
they hate polls (and freedom of speech and anything that has to do with governance).
I still don't see how we could make proof of individuality work on the blockchain. Maybe if your biometrics or your DNA would act as a private key?
I hate biometrics. Biometrics is the ultimate privacy invasion, and I am a hardcore anonymity advocate. An alternative proof of individuality that does not require biometrics is the proof of individuality that can be implemented if you apply
my proposal . Unfortunately there is not a single cryptocurrency community on earth that has ever applied cryptoparties as a mean of proof of individuality. Many physical cryptocurrency meetings take place all over the world, but no one has ever put a ballotbox, let the attendees put printed wallets/ public keys inside it, in order for the attendees to be anonymized .
Similarly, the
vote the numbers idea also has never been tried. And talking about the "vote the numbers" idea, it is utterly strange that no community in human history has ever dared to vote the numbers. Isn't it? How do you explain that? How comes and a relatively simple idea, has never been tried by anyone?
