v0.10.17.x Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
check your port - it's testnet:
masternodeaddr=hisserveripadress:19999
No error,hanging flashing cursor now.
Ther should be your vps's ip
If you run a hot mn you don't need that line
gives flashing cursor that dissappears and then comes back after a minute, stays in the window.
All ports should be open, no firewall, nothing really, its a dedicated mining machine.
 

thelonecrouton

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 15, 2014
1,135
813
283
What's the command to set how many IX confirmation's you want?
--instantxdepth=6 was what Evan used in his demonstration video. I don't think we can IX yet though, MN's don't seem to be networking too well.

Seeing some IX type stuff on stdout though:
Code:
ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
signing strMessage c6c1ae0df77f26ed5bf516c057dbcb398354653dde10537cf0fc30607f3edb7e707711
signing privkey 932ZyRKNcwwW7ijevLJGMQEEQJxz8cuSM7nig8P5MYTvoQX9uHq
signing pubkey2 msK3EXq5V6NHthvYKSQCbcAkSdciaPzAxU
verify strMessage c6c1ae0df77f26ed5bf516c057dbcb398354653dde10537cf0fc30607f3edb7e707711
verify addr 50.254.73.148:19999
verify addr 176.126.241.100:19999
verify addr 1 176.126.241.100:19999
verify pubkey2 msK3EXq5V6NHthvYKSQCbcAkSdciaPzAxU
InstantX::DoConsensusVote --- connected, sending vote 50.254.73.148:19999
ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 188.165.205.82:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.16.5/ : accepted c6c1ae0df77f26ed5bf516c057dbcb398354653dde10537cf0fc30607f3edb7e
 
Last edited by a moderator:

skillit

New Member
Sep 4, 2014
17
10
3
I've run through all these steps yet I'm still getting inbound port is not open. Please open it and try again.
 

Lukas_Jackson

Member
Nov 9, 2014
160
70
88
Does everybody see 10 tMNs?

{
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
"188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
"107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
"107.170.157.216:19999" : 1,
"86.20.185.139:19999" : 1
}
 

thelonecrouton

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 15, 2014
1,135
813
283
I've run through all these steps yet I'm still getting inbound port is not open. Please open it and try again.
Post your local and remote darkcoin.conf files, we might be able to help. The error you mention usually means you haven't opened 19999 on yout MN or there's a typo in a conf somewhere.
 

Raico

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Dash Support Group
May 28, 2014
138
142
193
Just wake up and get the wonderful news~!
4 tMN on the way~


Edit:
very strange thing happened. On the local, my qt wallet shows
successfully started masternode but on the remote: all my 4 tMN says not capable masternode
here is some info that may help:
Code:
"version" : 101700,
    "protocolversion" : 70046,
    "walletversion" : 60001,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 70769,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 11,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.73593487,
    "testnet" : true,
    "keypoololdest" : 1412930615,
    "keypoolsize" : 1001,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : ""
btw: i've took part in the testing for many times. And the testing environment is the same as last time (maybe 10.16.5). The only different is the new client(10.17.0).


Well, corrected: They show on the masternode list
Is there a wrong feedback when you have successfully setup the masternode remotely but got the not capable masternode massage? is it only me or anyone else?


Nevermind. My mistake. I found local shows everything correct but the remote seems not. Will delete block chainstats peer and debug then try is again.

After deleting all my block, chainstat, peer, log files (Both local & remote). And do it again on my 4 tMN. Still haven't setup the tMN successfully.

in local, it report successfully started masternode and it's in the masternode list (later it disappear if i closed the local client)
snapshot39.png

in remote:
snapshot42.png
masternode debug :
not capable masternode

Edit:
snapshot43.png


very strange~
 
Last edited by a moderator:

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
Does everybody see 10 tMNs?

{
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
"188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
"107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
"107.170.157.216:19999" : 1,
"86.20.185.139:19999" : 1
}
I see only 9:

{
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
"188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
"107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
"107.170.157.216:19999" : 1
}
 

thelonecrouton

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 15, 2014
1,135
813
283
Does everybody see 10 tMNs?

{
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
"188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
"107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
"107.170.157.216:19999" : 1,
"86.20.185.139:19999" : 1
}
Nope.
MN:
Code:
{
  "50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
  "176.126.241.100:19999" : 1,
  "64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
  "50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
  "50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
  "188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
  "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
  "107.170.168.162:19999" : 1
}
Local:
Code:
{
  "50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
  "50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
  "64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
  "50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
  "50.254.73.149:19999" : 1
}
 

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
Official testnet explorer display X address, not m.

Only seeing 5 nodes atm, same 5 as above but they do seem to be v.17
 

moocowmoo

Bovine Bit-flipper
Foundation Member
Jun 15, 2014
483
603
263
masternode.me
Dash Address
XmoocowYfrPKUR6p6M5aJZdVntQe71irCX
Not having luck getting 20 testnet masternodes online with version 0.10.17.0.
Ports 19999 listening (externally verified), logs show happy signs:

Code:
2014-11-28 06:47:32 CActiveMasternode::RegisterAsMasterNode() - Is capable master node!
2014-11-28 06:47:32 CActiveMasternode::RegisterAsMasterNode() - Adding myself to masternode list 162.243.76.23:19999 - CTxIn(COutPoint(de664d6b8dee103e8ef4b93df62288a2c836000907a659f568bf2ed0bb7bf217, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-11-28 06:47:32 CActiveMasternode::RegisterAsMasterNode() - Masternode input = CTxIn(COutPoint(de664d6b8dee103e8ef4b93df62288a2c836000907a659f568bf2ed0bb7bf217, 0), scriptSig=)
But none of them show up in either https://test.drk.mn/masternodes.html or my desktiop qt (v17) instance.

Tried all the usual tricks: delete peers.dat, add externalip, add masternodeminprotocol=70046 -- no joy.

(ignore the v0.16.16 entry in test.drk.mn, started wrong version once. Is a dead entry):

Code:
[email protected]:~/testnet$ darkcoind -datadir=. getinfo
{
    "version" : 101700,
    "protocolversion" : 70046,
    "walletversion" : 60001,
    "balance" : 3705.10204772,
    "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 70903,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 3,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.83244417,
    "testnet" : true,
    "keypoololdest" : 1415838109,
    "keypoolsize" : 1001,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : ""
}
 

stonehedge

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jul 31, 2014
696
333
233
And thank you flare for being the brains and hard work behind my good intentions. You've seen what happens when somebody in my line of work tries to get technical :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: TaoOfSatoshi

coingun

Active Member
Masternode Owner/Operator
Jul 8, 2014
489
402
133
masternode.io
I have given flare 15 instances to be used as testnet masternodes for a few months. Hopefully this will help make the most mature test environment possible. Lets make this the biggest and best testnet yet! My free time is limited but I can't wait to get involved.
Holy cow!!! You sir are a gentleman and a scholar! Hopefully flare has more luck then the rest of us getting masternodes into the list!

Edit: If anyone wants to donate MN instances to testnet I'd be more then happy to look after any ones that flare can't maintain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stonehedge

stonehedge

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jul 31, 2014
696
333
233
That's very kind of you to say so but lets face it, making testnet as "real" as possible for InstantTX testing needs to be a community priority. Lets do this! (He says as he runs off to work late)
 

moocowmoo

Bovine Bit-flipper
Foundation Member
Jun 15, 2014
483
603
263
masternode.me
Dash Address
XmoocowYfrPKUR6p6M5aJZdVntQe71irCX
Moo was like instantX :cool:
I'm waiting for a 2nd IP to hook you up, maybe in the meanwhile you two could work something out.
We chat in irc often. No biggie, is just a few minutes to get set up.

Got the credentials.. will install once we have the next version of 17.

Thanks again for contributing! The more nodes the merrier! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: skillit

OnetyOne

New Member
Aug 4, 2014
34
19
8
We chat in irc often. No biggie, is just a few minutes to get set up.

Got the credentials.. will install once we have the next version of 17.

Thanks again for contributing! The more nodes the merrier! :)
Cool, always happy to help out :)
If there's any problem I could grant you acces to my customer panel to redeploy the VPS, just let me know.
Have fun!
 
  • Like
Reactions: moocowmoo

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
Can anyone do testing for InstantX yet? I can't, only see 7 Masternodes:

{
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.148:19999" : 1,
"64.251.69.134:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.149:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.147:19999" : 1,
"188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,
"178.62.203.249:19999" : 1
}
 

bituzer

Member
Apr 23, 2014
19
26
78
mine is not on your list. On my server I only see 4 masternodes right now. my current block is 71047 which is in sync with testnet explorer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.