- Aug 6, 2014
yeah, lets focus now on the testing ..
Definitely. We don't want a surprise enforcement, but we should take advantage of the current 90% voluntary paying super-majority we have now. The altruism isn't guaranteed at any point in the future. When we kick off the non-payers, we want them to be a tiny minority.As long as it isn't a surprise enforcement, I am all for it to prevent unnecessary forks. Pools should have ample time to be ready for the enforcement (from daemon updates to server-side code). Any pool operator running a DRK pool should know by now that it is a 80/20 breakout. Having said that, is the masternode system functioning as a truly random system (I know there was a bug about every other block the same MN would be selected). There is a point of variance but then there shouldn't be these replicated patterns of payouts as time passes. I'm certainly not complaining when it is my nodes getting the payout but I can see it causing a ruckus if it's not a truly random selection.
Guys, I agree with you, but the problem isn't the level of consensus. The problem is that the enforcement code doesn't work!Definitely. We don't want a surprise enforcement, but we should take advantage of the current 90% voluntary paying super-majority we have now. The altruism isn't guaranteed at any point in the future. When we kick off the non-payers, we want them to be a tiny minority.
Darkcoin is becoming more refined with its core anon features. It makes sense to get the better randomness of RC3 back (not perfect but it's way better than our current situation with RC4), and put the non-paying pools on the right track before moving on to other things. Getting the MNs paid properly should be a part of the fine tuning that's happening here.
the completion bar looks misleading as certain input amounts (mostly the 4096's amounts) have n/a for Darksend Rounds and will therefore not be included in the
completion bar.. i should be on some 1% completion of Total Balance but wallet shows 75% completion.
edit : i set Amount and Rounds to 19800 / 8 rounds
It turns out the masternode voting system is over complicated and somewhat risky to the network, so I've removed it and am using the RC3 masternode payment system. This means we won't have enforcement, but it fixes all of these issues and removes the risk to the network. <Quote from JIRA-33 http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-33?>Details, please.
I actually think this is basically fine.
What about this?
1000 on the road of privacyI'm testing on anonymizing 300 tdrk, 4 rounds. Need someone to pair with. Is anyone doing testing right now?
Edit: GUYS, this is RC5 testing, you can't sleep yet!! Also, you can talk about what you want for the interface later!!! We need to test the heck out of all of the wallets!
Oh, thank you very much. But don't send back to the faucet right now because it's down, we can't get tdrk from the faucet. Also, can you set the Options of your wallet to 300 drk to keep anonymized, and 4 rounds? thanksI just send to you 1000 tDRK and 5000 to faucet, tMN payed very well.