• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
superplus said:
or is your build from page 33 not suitable for the new chain?
can't compile the binaries from page 34 on this machine :(
Click to expand...
What OS?

On Windows its %APPDATA%\Darkcoin\testnet3
on Linux
~/.darkcoin/testnet3

you need to delete. My builds are suitable for new testnet blockchain.

And you need testnet=1 of course :)
 
Did poo-poo... deleted my wallet.dat. Was thinking about darkcoin.conf and totally forgot testnet3 contained testnet wallet... In my defense, I was burning my dinner !!

dum-dum-tDonations welome: msyfd8gBFQuNoKf2deUvTEGpQeDZzXz5uR
 
3333.3333 sent to msyfd8gBFQuNoKf2deUvTEGpQeDZzXz5uR
8871f6a19f81c1914c5c951c7786e955cb16658fe358e7c857f11739a15d90d9
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yidakee said:
Did poo-poo... deleted my wallet.dat. Was thinking about darkcoin.conf and totally forgot testnet3 contained testnet wallet... In my defense, I was burning my dinner !!

dum-dum-tDonations welome: msyfd8gBFQuNoKf2deUvTEGpQeDZzXz5uR
Click to expand...
1000 tDRK sent using DS+
27e8ff80efd23daf511c9aabbb7c47438e9454619da21b45bd673539ce52131f
 
darkzero said:
1000 tDRK sent using DS+
27e8ff80efd23daf511c9aabbb7c47438e9454619da21b45bd673539ce52131f
Click to expand...

Thanks darkzero, and mr 3333.333 :tongue:
Interesting... first auto payment with 0.00 fee

bRTNsbi.png


Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 7 nodes
Date: 7/30/14 12:40
Debit: 0.00 DRK
Credit: 0.00 DRK
Net amount: 0.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 6dfe9e3312038cf499e6f24b112da7d78866e41a6e38534ca1d319d8ad0b2809



Debug information

Debit: -3333.3333 DRK
Credit: 132.933332 DRK
Credit: 666.66666 DRK
Credit: 133.333332 DRK
Credit: 0.10 DRK
Credit: 666.66666 DRK
Credit: 133.333332 DRK
Credit: 0.10 DRK
Credit: 666.66666 DRK
Credit: 133.333332 DRK
Credit: 0.10 DRK
Credit: 666.66666 DRK
Credit: 133.333332 DRK
Credit: 0.10 DRK

Transaction:
CTransaction(hash=6dfe9e3312038cf499e6f24b112da7d78866e41a6e38534ca1d319d8ad0b2809, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=13, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(8871f6a19f81c1914c5c951c7786e955cb16658fe358e7c857f11739a15d90d9, 0), scriptSig=304402200d6f8b9686517e4e)
CTxOut(nValue=132.93333200, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=666.66666000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=133.33333200, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=0.10000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=666.66666000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=133.33333200, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=0.10000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=666.66666000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=133.33333200, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=0.10000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=666.66666000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=133.33333200, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)
CTxOut(nValue=0.10000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc5238a63e5d)

Inputs:
Amount=-0.00000001 DRK IsMine=false
 
MrMime said:
Did you have to manually denom multiple times to get those 3 or 4 rounds of DS? Leaving wallet on so far for ~10 hours and coin control only shows 2 rounds so far.

EDIT: Also getting signing timed out errors for darksend Status. Is this because not enough users trying to darksend ?
Click to expand...
yidakee said:
Evan, still loosing some funds to auto-denom...

L77gmjG.png


GrM3V2i.png
Click to expand...
yidakee said:
Yeah, but....

floldCJ.png
Click to expand...

Auto-denom should cost 0.001 in fees, I'll look into that. It definitely has a cost though (although, it will be really low). A fee of 0.025 means you got hit by the collateral bug (which I'm also looking into).
 
DarkSend+ Testing Report :

Today, I've made a Darksend testing, And here is the full process:

Summary:
From : mk93k5tH61DJLowviqm15DCPPf4SftaGXg
To : n2R6GaV6zqZoJapcaE19LqDwpDB5F4WwGW
Amount1: 1234
Amount2: 1234(.012)

Wallet (sending wallet) :
snapshot5.png

Sending:
snapshot6.png

Here is my Sending Address Link:
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/mk93k5tH61DJLowviqm15DCPPf4SftaGXg

Here is my Receiving Address Link:
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/n2R6GaV6zqZoJapcaE19LqDwpDB5F4WwGW

You can see the amount from my Receiving Address But not from my Sending Address:
1.jpg
So you can't simply establish the link between Sender and Receiver by sending amount.

Now, Let's look further to the Receive Address. Take the first 1234 transaction for example:
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx...741c6cbb51143728ed96852f7c7b8c79a095098c8a#o1
2.jpg
You can see so many Input Address but no one is real sender's. Let's click one of them:
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/n3GTyP8Uwko2jQpNsXiqhwi1V78TD5VCLC
3.jpg
All of them look like this. There is no real sender's Address, Still.
And you can dig more deeper in that and see what would happened.(I've done some random click and still no REAL Sender's Address appears)

Done.

So, in my situation, i think the Darksend+ has succeed.

Although there are still some little part are being debugged. But i want to say: Bravo,Evan&Dev team, Bravo, everyone in here for your contribution~

P.S: Sorry for the bad English and so many pics that may disturb your reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eduffield said:
The 0.002 you paid is going to the miners.
Click to expand...

So, to clarify - the 0.002 fee goes to the miners but 20% of that will go to MN's?
If so - is that per Demon transaction? or per Demon as a whole transaction?
 
Started my v0.10.12.9 (0xdc7468f2de0ae12ba92049f71bad398172555ece) node back up a bit ago and it began creating very high system load. Checked the terminal I started the daemon in and I see a bunch of:
Code: 
************************
EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc
std::bad_alloc
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top