That will be greatly appreciated.Great new format elbereth. Tip coming your way once I've finished my day job.
That will be greatly appreciated.Great new format elbereth. Tip coming your way once I've finished my day job.
Still no answer...I won't have access to my cold wallets for the next 8 days or so.
- I do nothing, local/remote darkcoind stay at RC4. Do I get coins or not?
I think you should be alright. 90% adoption or three weeks. Whatever happens first.Still no answer...
http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-58Guys, after the anonymization process is done 100% and you stop Darksend, should the wallet lock itself again. I finished anonymizing 300DRK on mainnet then proceeded to send a donation to the development fund, everything went great, but I was not required a passphrase to send the funds out and I sent those funds hours after the anon process was done. Just a small thing but I think the wallet should lock once you stop the Darksend process or something.
Dont be concerned that is by design, if you read Kristov Atlas paper, you will see that the system adds a duff as part of the normal process.I'm concerned about something I've seen little reported, but I've seen it twice. And that's enough to concern me.
On BCT, one person reported denominating 80DRK 8 deep, and having 80.00000008 when done.
I noticed something in my own wallet that is similar. After denominating 1DRK 8 deep, it shows as 1.00000001 anoned.
Is this a calculation/UI/display issue, or are single duffs getting added in somewhere?
OK, thanks, I created a new ticket I guess flare will merge them.
Even on testnet, you could set it to 100 and may end up with 120 or so. I didn't test the most recent release to see if this has been honed in to the target value or not. From first reports, looks pretty spot on.I'm concerned about something I've seen little reported, but I've seen it twice. And that's enough to concern me.
On BCT, one person reported denominating 80DRK 8 deep, and having 80.00000008 when done.
I noticed something in my own wallet that is similar. After denominating 1DRK 8 deep, it shows as 1.00000001 anoned.
Is this a calculation/UI/display issue, or are single duffs getting added in somewhere?
The duff is part of the denomination amounts the system breaks larger amounts into denominations that include one duff at the end to distinguish denominated amounts from normal amounts of the same size. Darkcoin denominations always include a duff in the end.But, not everybody is involved with the intimate details of testnet development. In fact, very few people are.
Where does this free duff come from?
Hello camosoul! Why didn't you participate on testnet?! I was waiting for you.... lol... :tongue:But, not everybody is involved with the intimate details of testnet development. In fact, very few people are.
Where does this free duff come from?
he is hardcore and testing the testclients on main net.Hello camosoul! Why didn't you participate on testnet?! I was waiting for you.... lol... :tongue:
As I understand the spork is activated at will, so Evan will activate it when the network is 90% on RC5 or in 3 weeks whatever happens first.Does anyone know the exact timestamp of enforcement?
Ah.. Cool! But he'd better join us when Evan is ready to test the Locking Instant Transaction which will happen soon!he is hardcore and testing the testclients on main net.
Good explanation.The duff is part of the denomination amounts the system breaks larger amounts into denominations that include one duff at the end to distinguish denominated amounts from normal amounts of the same size. Darkcoin denominations always include a duff in the end.
Whether or not I participate in testnet isn't really a matter of concern. I'm just some guy.Hello camosoul! Why didn't you participate on testnet?! I was waiting for you.... lol... :tongue:
I'm *not* an expert, but as I understand it, when the system denominates it adds an extra duff to each denomination, but then when it begins mixing, that duff is removed as part of the .0125 DRK fee.Whether or not I participate in testnet isn't really a matter of concern. I'm just some guy.
The point is that nobody would know why or how a duff comes out of nowhere unless s/he did participate in testnet. When most crypto users have no idea where their wallet.dat file is stored, I think some kind of explanation is needed... We see an extra duff in our wallets and wonder if there's a leak in the miners, or some other wild, stupid conclusion... A link to Jira isn't good enough. I can read the info on how DarkSend works, but there's no mention of getting a free duff out of it... Where's it come from? If enough people denominate, will the market be flooded/inflated with manufactured duffs much like too much mining reward would do?
Do you see where this leaves people hanging? I get it. I'm just playing Devil's Advocate. But who's going to dig that far? If I'm going to see it happen the second I start using the coin, there needs to be an explanation for it. If there is something right in the user's face that isn't what they're used to, you've got to tell them WTF is going on in the same time frame.
With a beginner understanding of how crypto works, it looks like denomination adds duffs to the coin supply. With even less understanding, it just looks broken.
I don't think that keeping people in the dark is the answer... No pun intended...I agree that it could be confusing though. Perhaps the client should "hide" those from the basic view and only show it on advanced.
Well I hope not, because that would mean we have to update all pools again!As I understand the spork is activated at will, so Evan will activate it when the network is 90% on RC5 or in 3 weeks whatever happens first.
Well they have to... Anyway I don't think we will reach 90% without enforce, so 3 weeks it will be.Well I hope not, because that would mean we have to update all pools again!
Well updating a Pool is a thing within minutes.. i dont get why most pools take that long to updateWell I hope not, because that would mean we have to update all pools again!
Not really understanding it then. Why not upgrade now and enforce in 3 weeks?Well they have to... Anyway I don't think we will reach 90% without enforce, so 3 weeks it will be.
flare or eduffield could clarify. As I understand it, you dont need to update again the code is already in this version the spork is like a remote control fork with a switch you can only flip once. This means everybody updates now, when Evan feels the network is at a compliance level where enforcement would go smoothly he flips the switch, but there is no need to update again.Not really understanding it then. Why not upgrade now and enforce in 3 weeks?
This is correct - we are waiting for 90% of network hash to be updated, which correlates with masternode payments to RC5 masternodes.flare or eduffield could clarify. As I understand it, you dont need to update again the code is already in this version the spork is like a remote control fork with a switch you can only flip once. This means everybody updates now, when Evan feels the network is at a compliance level where enforcement would go smoothly he flips the switch, but there is no need to update again.
Ask me in two and a half weeksWhat happens if after 3 weeks we have 80%?
It's either 90% or 3 weeks. So if tomorrow we've reached 90%, Evan will turn on the switch, if not, wait for 3 weeks, even if it's 80% then, he'll turn on the switch.What happens if after 3 weeks we have 80%?