I have also proposed a self-correction system, in order to self-correct the two basic variables of every vote, the minimum participation and the selection process. This is what I call "the triple vote".Through the Tezos voting system, stakeholders can also change the voting system. “We are not necessarily beholden to voting as a governance mechanism,” Breitman says. “Every part of the system can evolve, including the governance system itself.” He compares this means of self-correction to a constitutional amendment—another powerful idea in light of the conflict over bitcoin.
Why should we fund Tezos? What is it and why do you think it is beneficial for Dash users?Tezos is a self-amendment Nomic Bank that can instantiate any cryptocoin.
So they can instantiate dash.
Would you like dash to fund Tezos, in order they instantiate dash in their platform?
Have you read the thread? Watch the videos.Why should we fund Tezos? What is it and why do you think it is beneficial for Dash users?
'g =
pair
pair timestamp tez
pair (contract unit unit) (contract unit unit)
lambda
pair (pair tez unit) 'g
pair unit 'g
lambda
pair (pair tez unit)
pair
pair timestamp tez
pair (contract unit unit) (contract unit unit)
pair unit
pair
pair timestamp tez
pair (contract unit unit) (contract unit unit)
parameter timestamp ;
storage
pair
(pair timestamp tez) # T N
(pair (contract unit unit) (contract unit unit)) ; # A B
return unit ;
code
{ DUP ; CDAAR ; # T
NOW ;
COMPARE ; LE ;
IF { DUP ; CDADR ; # N
BALANCE ;
COMPARE ; LE ;
IF { CDR ; UNIT ; PAIR }
{ DUP ; CDDDR ; # B
BALANCE ; UNIT ;
DIIIP { CDR } ;
TRANSFER_TOKENS ;
PAIR } }
{ DUP ; CDDAR ; # A
BALANCE ;
UNIT ;
DIIIP { CDR } ;
TRANSFER_TOKENS ;
PAIR } }
Yeah yeah.....sponsoring academic development related to cryptocurrency governance is stupid. The smart thing is to sponsor MMA fightersIf I understand correctly from their white-paper is that Tezos is about to upgrade production "stable" network with code that is already running in "testing" network.
I *may* support if, but only if they show how it can be applied to the Dash network.
Else what are the benefits for Dash ?
Any kind of academic development must be a bonus for Dash, or else it will not get funded by us.
No... first you vote, then they develop. Why someone to start developing something, if he is not sure that you want it?If you want, ask them to develop a "seamless upgrade layer" for Dash. If they do, I will be happy to vote yes to fund them.
I am not a Tezos affiliate. I am just a poor Dash community member.Do they agree to develop "seamless upgrade layer" for Dash ? If they agree, at least on paper, we will evaluate their pre-proposal and discuss it seriously.
There is a chance that they can get funded.
They will develop nothing for Dash, unless we ask them.>On the other hand I dont dare to bother the Tezos people, as far as I see the result in the poll of this thread.
Vote may change into positive YES, if we are convinced that they will develop a "seamless upgrade layer" for Dash, rather than brand new alt-coin (Tez).
Good remarks.Tezos or other coin actually would be a good idea if we look at how big successful company work : better own your competitors : coca-cola owns water, sprite, fanta, etc...
Only thing is I am not sure how juridically the network could fund or own another coin (or part of it), and how that could beneficiate its users/masternodes (monetarily speaking)
https://medium.com/@arthurb/the-path-forward-eb2e6f63be67I did warn you. Expect a lot more turmoil in the coming months.
They have a stable tezos version, which I succesfully compiled.Two years in the making and still nothing.
And if you read the whitepaper, you'd see they have special controls to rollback things if it doesn't quite work out the way they choose.
It's a nice idea but very poorly executed. It's going to end badly.
When they vote for a protocol change, they compile it in the fly and implement it asap.It's a nice idea but very poorly executed. It's going to end badly.
I have no doubt about the concepts, sandboxing etc, but the politics and slow pace is ridiculousWhen they vote for a protocol change, they compile it in the fly and implement it asap.
This is reflection my friend, and this sounds amazing.