It depends on a few factors: The number of masternodes vs blocktime and a possible node restart.How long after starting a node for the first time should I be expecting a payment? been 2 days 10h
It is easier to make reference node to persist history. Need to have a queue, on every block:That's one of the reasons the payment reference node is only a temporary solution and we want to get rid of it.
On average, that should be accurate (node count divided by average blocks found per day), however, with the ever changing node count and the reference node(s) seemingly being restarted at different times (for various reasons), seems consistency in payouts is dwindling for multiple people.I was thinking...
1440/576=2.5day/payout
Correct me if I'm wrong...
Indeed once stopped and restarted you have to wait x nr of MNs till you will get possibility to be paid. +/- 10%On average, that should be accurate (node count divided by average blocks found per day), however, with the ever changing node count and the reference node(s) seemingly being restarted at different times (for various reasons), seems consistency in payouts is dwindling for multiple people.
Aside from the weird node restarts there's no problem with the payment system but (I don't mean this in any way as offensive) with the lacking information on (or people's understanding of) how the payout worksOn average, that should be accurate (node count divided by average blocks found per day), however, with the ever changing node count and the reference node(s) seemingly being restarted at different times (for various reasons), seems consistency in payouts is dwindling for multiple people.
How can we understand, that node restart occurs?Aside from the weird node restarts there's no problem with the payment system but (I don't mean this in any way as offensive) with the lacking information on (or people's understanding of) how the payout works![]()
I believe this has to do with the reference node people speak of..and I know Evan is aware and working on a solution to remove the reference node all together.How can we understand, that node restart occurs?
P.S. One my MN gets payments correctly and second doesn't get payments at all after the latest update. Why developers ignore this problem???
Ok so the worst case would be 88 hours.It depends on a few factors: The number of masternodes vs blocktime and a possible node restart.
Let's say there are ~1440 masternodes and roughly every 2 minutes a block is found. In a worst case scenario your masternode would get paid last, so 1440 x 2 minutes = about 48 hours.
Now add in the factor that a node restart is neccesairy. In this example it has to be restarted after Masternode# 1200 is paid (and yours isn't yet). 1440 x 2 minutes + 1200 x 2 minutes = 88 hours.
Do mind that this all is just a worst-case example explaining how it roughly works and because of the "randomness" your Masternode can either receive nothing for a few days or get 2 payements pretty fast after eachother.
Edit;
To aprox calculate the time between blocks check http://explorer.darkcoin.io/chain/Darkcoin
For the number of currently active masternodes check the bottom of the page https://drk.mn/
Why did you restart? Do you think you got payment because of that?So, I'm very happy, because now I've got payment at my completely restarted node after about 1700 blocks.
Why did you restart? Do you think you got payment because of that?
My second masternode had no payments yet, so I decided to reinstall it. It worked under send-many command and after last update I moved it to dedicated wallet, but I copied datadir instead of downloading it from peers. Also, I used the same privkey and didn't create zero-address. So, maybe reinstallation will help. I'll post about results later
We don't. But we simply can't fix everything overnight. We are moving to new code base now and fixing things at the same time.How can we understand, that node restart occurs?
P.S. One my MN gets payments correctly and second doesn't get payments at all after the latest update. Why developers ignore this problem???
...network nodes failed to agree on a common ledger, essentially creating twin transaction histories that the development team later corrected over a period of several hours. This process resulted in the loss of customer funds on at least one exchange...
...In the meantime, the Stellar transaction network will run on a single verifying node in order to avoid similar problems while the new protocol is being developed...
https://www.coindesk.com/stability-questions-dog-ripple-protocol-stellar-fork/...A new white paper featuring the proposed consensus protocol, as well as its code are expected to be released in the next few months, she continued....
Congrats!So, I'm very happy, because now I've got payment at my completely restarted node after about 1700 blocks.
He acknowledged it 10 days ago in this thread...UdjinM6, thanks for the answer. I simply wanted to pay attention on this problem and get declaration that problem exists, because there was no answer and some users told that there's nothing to fix. Thanks for the job you do.
Sorry, I was inattentive...He acknowledged it 10 days ago in this thread...
I restarted mine on a new wallet address when 1350 mn were active got first award after ~1800 blocks took about 2 daysHow long after starting a node for the first time should I be expecting a payment? been 2 days 10h
New record: another one of my Masternodes is at 6368 blocks without payments and still counting.4160 blocks without payment. Maybe this Masternode only accepts cheques?
Edit: after 4419 blocks the cheque finally arrived. New world record...