I just cried you a river reading these posts about your horrible hardship and injustices suffered and then I got to this!
He went out and defended the project and I bought more. Lots more. F for going insane on Darkcoin back in 2014 and 2015. It was just fucking awesome.
So, you're the guy that bought Dash in the period 2014 through to 2015 when it was trading for average price of $3.50, you rode it to $1600 in December 2017, selling masternode rewards as you went which paid for your original tiny investment in Dash and now you are still sitting on bags 10x greater than their purchase price, which is now completely house money, and we are supposed to feel sorry for you? What cry baby you are!
But first, let's back up. In your posts you take care to throw venom at everyone you can think of, in particular you like to blame the current DCG administration for the faults of the previous admins, all of whom have been rightful moved on for betraying the network, if we are to be critical of DCG, we need to at least break it up by the eras and asses each based on the people involved at the time. Quantum Explorer (QE) has improved things dramatically in DCG regarding the delivery of Evolution, he has made some excellent hires replacing some of the weaker devs, he has re-engineered the architecture from the jank javascript bull crap (thanks Andy) to a more robust Rust based arch, he ditched 3 inconsistent databases (mongoDB) for one consistent DB, GroveDB that has built in proofs and not only is essential for Platform, but moves forward the Computer Science industry by inventing a new database type entirely.
https://www.grovedb.org/ He created the consensus engine for Platform (Evolution) based on Tendermint, now forked into Tenderdash. Previously, there was no consensus in Platform back in the Ryan and Andy days, basically he has closed so many loops and solved so many challenges, he is getting amazing work done with his team.
Of course you know all this, but wilfully choose to gloss over it, because it doesn't fit your narrative. Boo Hoo ! Now has there been scope creep again into Evo, absolutely, it can be justified, but sure, it means that we've again pivoted from MVP - just user names, to something far more useful, refer to the Dashmoney dapps and how flexible the Platform already on testnet is.
https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/checking-out-some-dash-dapps-by-dashmoney-👀.53906/
You spray some venom at
https://crowdnode.io/ Crowdnode is offering a fantastic service to the network and closing the gap for partial ownership of a masternode for those that can't afford $33k for one, or don't want to have that much exposure, for balances under 100 Dash, only a trusted version of the service exists (they hold your coins), for balances in chunks of 100 Dash, you can join a trustless masternode where you control the keys, this is the optimal solution. However, note that during the time it takes to establish the entire masternode, the Dash is in custody of Crowdnode as they are the trusted party in the signing process to make sure all participants are honest. Please educate yourself on the offering before spreading misinformation.
One thing I will give you credit for is the network's softness on privacy, there is no such thing as digital cash without privacy and I am continuously dismayed by the network, both DCG and MNOs alike not doing more in this regard. It seems the network is fearful of repercussions and honestly, those will come whether we double down on privacy or not because we will always be branded as a privacy coin, so we may as well fully embrace it and take market share from other successful privacy coins! Focusing more on privacy can only help Dash, not harm it, there is a lot of interest for privacy coins in this market and Dash is missing out on that interest because the optics are that we are not world class, it's a pity, because our built-in mixing is state of the art and untraceable when when a few simply rules are routinely followed.
https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/dash-coinjoin-mixing-guide-and-best-practices.51655/
Eventually you get to the point of this thread and miss it entirely pissing all over yourself like the useless cuck you are
Dash Control Group and the low IQ minions really do not care about the miners. They're going to kill off Proof of Work entirely as soon as they can and a majority of MNOs will support it, cause they'll get a larger share too of course. That's exactly how corruption works. Two fuckers decide to "legitimately" take (steal) from a third. They won't even know or care what miners think. They've already proven this. So there's no denying this. Once you show you're unethical, basically corrupt, you will just keep pulling the same corrupt string whenever needed. It will be justified in some way, e.g. BLS provides more entropy than PoW, so why not and the usual poppycock of 'overpaying for miners'. Says who? The masternodes!
Sadly, a lot of Masternodes owner share you view here, rather focusing on what it is fair and just - socialists, than focusing on capital expenditure and waste of resources - capitalists. This conversation isn't about being fair, or a nice guy, this conversation is simply, are the rewards paid to the miners are good investment for this network? Are we getting back more value from the security they offer us than we spend on them? Can we spend less on hashrate (electricity) and still get the same level of security from our miners. It has nothing to do with looking after our mates, or making sure their bellies are full, that's not how you run a business and this block chain like all others has a set of economics that need to be balanced if were going to keep any value in this network at all. Currently, with the advent of ChainLocks and some other changes, our reliance on miners solely for security has decreased, so too should what we pay them.
You also, make an appeal to a higher authority.
I would advise external consulting on Dash's economics to evaluate the correlation between Dash's specific design and horrible market performance, despite its self-proclaimed superior features. Dash MNOs increased their share after Ryan's delusional slide deck to improve Dash's economics and the chart today reflects that performance is even worse. So are we going to discuss the reversal of that decision? Cause the flawed theory didn't work out and suggests the opposite might be true
The simple answer to this question is that the re-allocation that Ryan negotiated with the miners did not go far enough and worse just before the first re-allocation happened, Binance spun up 270 masternodes from customer's money and totally negated any benefit from the re-allocation, pushing the APY down and stifling any yield FOMO we may have seen from the improvement in the tokenomics, this coupled with a few OG morons, eg Toknormal and AFBitcoins aka DashAF selling on principle and misguided sense of fairness and economics negated any positive effect.
https://docs.dash.org/en/stable/docs/user/introduction/features.html#block-reward-allocation
You praise Evan for promoting the project and I agree an Evangelist founder is super helpful, Vitalik, Charles hoskinson , Brad Garlinghouse, Richard Heart, Adam Back, all these people help massively pump their coins by building a community of fanatics around them and building trust in themselves and the network they barrack for, we could do with someone like that, we had Evan back in the day and Amanda, but the point is it doesn't have to come from DCG, a good example of that is Michael Saylor, a nobody previously, buys a bag and becomes the top shill over night. Who in DCG would you have going on the circuit? So far only QE is half way presentable and he is also the CTO and top coder in the org, so are we going to work on delivery or talk about it and make more empty promises like the previous mob did and deliver fuck all? and by the way, Evan left the project when he realised he couldn't deliver on his promises, so I laugh at how you give him a free-pass when a lot of this mess is entirely of his own making.
Anyway, your moronic rant continues, my eyes are bleeding at this point, you didn't make a 1000x, but you haven't lost any money either, you're still mad as hell, you expect profit from the work of others, you are good at giving orders to others as to what they should do or have done, but never once do you mention, what the actual fuck did
you do for this network? What effort did you put in to build this community, foster adoptions, evangelise on socials, find investors, incubate integrations, fund initiatives from your own massive stash of free coins, etc etc. What the actual fuck did you do for Dash? The answer is of course nothing and so you reap what you sow. All you ever did was buy a few masternodes in 2015 at $3.50 a coin, watch them make you a millionaire several times over, get stupidly greedy to not sell (assuming, that's why you're still here) and then watch it all come back down to just 10x your entry.
Finally.
NEW DCG TEAM OBJECTIVE:
Price appreciation towards $100 at least by EOY. This is the target for the executive. Not a gazillion lines of vaporcode. Get out there and promote Dash. Thank you very much!
Not a security, DCG owes you NOTHING and they are not going to pump your bags so you can exit. Dump here, dump now, the market won't move up while your ballast holds us back, please offload and leave, take your fucking venom and entitlement with you, Dash will be the better for it.
www.dashcentral.org
www.dash.org
