It would be easier, because telegram has a official API.how hard would it be to get the same thing for telegram ?
I think we have a much more active community on telegram (incl chats) and that should be easier to get some action in there ?!?
I could be wrong but I seriously doubt he'll get funding on a personal project...
Have you seen this crowd?
They down voted the testers for god-sake
Can't even get 1 month payout for testing?
The testers proposal wasn't well-defined as to who are "testers" and how that gets determined. It was a good idea, but not a well-written or well thought-out proposal. I voted against it because it was a bad proposal, not because of who proposed it. (How do you definitively define "testers"? What prevents anyone from raising their hand and saying they deserve to be re-imbursed? How to prove yes/no for each situation?)I agree, did you see how they quashed funding for DashWhale?
Unfortunately a significant number of masternode owners COMPLETELY misunderstand the purpose of the budgeting system and routinely vote down anything that is not directly asked for by Evan.
The purpose is to build the ecosystem in a decentralized way, not wait until Evan asks for money for a project and then rubber stamp it. It's actually quite infuriating to be given a tool for decentralized governance and yet look to a centralized "authority" for his blessing before voting.
I vote for Evan's proposals because they're a sensible use of the budget system. I thought the Dash whale proposal was horrible, so I voted against. Same w/"the testers".So you're surprised then that when given a choice, most people - most of the time - will choose to abdicate their own power of choice?
Just look around, man - this part of human nature is precisely the reason we are all here having these kinds of discussions. Projects like Dash are the natural consequence of the sort of abuses that become possible once enough people renounce their own power of choice.
Reasonable people can disagree. I'm glad that you think for yourself, but I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people out there who, for whatever reason, do not. They just follow the leader. Even some MN owners.It's pretty ridiculous then to assume that MN owners are just sheep who follow their Great Leader without thinking things through.
"Renouncing their power of choice" by voting against proposals they don't like? Please. It's just the opposite.