Separate names with a comma.
Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!
Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by teamer, Sep 3, 2015.
Plans are for January. might relaunch it and will need some promotion
how hard would it be to get the same thing for telegram ?
I think we have a much more active community on telegram (incl chats) and that should be easier to get some action in there ?!?
It would be easier, because telegram has a official API.
Are you sure that telegram has a more active community? All my friends use WhatsApp and don't even know telegram...
so the funds in wallet are inaccessible until then?
The testers proposal wasn't well-defined as to who are "testers" and how that gets determined. It was a good idea, but not a well-written or well thought-out proposal. I voted against it because it was a bad proposal, not because of who proposed it. (How do you definitively define "testers"? What prevents anyone from raising their hand and saying they deserve to be re-imbursed? How to prove yes/no for each situation?)
Note: I didn't "down-vote the testers", I downvoted the ill-conceived proposal. Come up with a better way of identifying which testers qualify and should be re-imbursed.
I voted for Raganius' tennis advertising because I thought it was good for Dash as a whole -- Evan didn't propose that one either.
The Dashwhale proposal was confusing as hell and I thought it was horrible, so I voted against it.
Could it be that maybe the reason MN owners vote is based on the validity of the proposal and not the person itself?
It might also be that Evan comes up with very well-reasoned and well-written and well-thought-out proposals. It's the reason Dash has come to the point it has already — he thinks things through pretty well. Take incentivised hosting of nodes, for example. Why did no other crypto come up with that first? Amazing solution, solves a trajedy of the commons problem. It stands to reason that the person who come up with that idea could also maybe be able to come up with intelligent use of the Dash MN budget system.
There haven't been a large number of proposals from others that I'm aware of, and of the ones I have read, I don't judge them a great use of funds. So it might just be that certain people come up with better proposals than others. Causation is not correlation.
It's a pretty huge assumption when you lump most MN owners together with statements like:
I vote for Evan's proposals because they're a sensible use of the budget system. I thought the Dash whale proposal was horrible, so I voted against. Same w/"the testers".
People who understand Dash and fintech in general have to possess at least certain level of technical knowledge in order to download the wallets and hold digital currency. Even more so with MN owners. It's pretty ridiculous then to assume that MN owners are just sheep who follow their Great Leader without thinking things through.
"Renouncing their power of choice" by voting against proposals they don't like? Please. It's just the opposite.
well we have 2-3 active Dash chat groups on telegram app !
Reasonable people can disagree. I'm glad that you think for yourself, but I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people out there who, for whatever reason, do not. They just follow the leader. Even some MN owners.
send me via pm ir phone number u used and where to refund and I will do it. no problem
I use Whatsapp ever day and so do all of my friends. This will be an awesome way to pay for rent and other things.
Yes, it may take a while to catch on, but once it gains traction it would be a huge boon for the Dash ecosystem.
@teamer Any news on the the DASH Whatsapp. It was a great idea.
How did I never see this thread?!