v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

whocares

Member
Aug 15, 2014
46
13
48
I did a reindex+zapwallettxes, del peers.dat and after six confirmations I felt like didn't do the things right till now(IX+DS, 1000 tDRKs IX only looked fine), but when I tried to send from the receiving address got "Insufficient funds" msg. Transactions were already confirmed 7 times.
I decided to close the wallet and open it again, but when I did it, transactions were under confirmation (2/6) ..
 
TanteStefana

TanteStefana

Grizzled Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
2,863
1,854
1,283
I guess I'm just going to mix the coins I have so that tomorrow I can practice sending with DS and IX enabled. G'nite!
 
yidakee

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
Ok, the 1 input bug seems better now, but not entirely gone.

bug #1 - When trying to IX, if you don't have 6 confirms on any give input, the QT will complain about "unmatching" fees.







Here it is again, but with the 1001 input from the faucet, though setting amount to 1000.99 did send IX successfully



And here again with another input, again conflicting change value and fees, but did send IX successfully.





 
  • Like
Reactions: UdjinM6
TanteStefana

TanteStefana

Grizzled Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
2,863
1,854
1,283
I second/third that ^^^ Also, I'd still like to see something graphical or message saying a sent transaction was approved via IX on the SEND tab...
 
  • Like
Reactions: hashcow
Sub-Ether

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
InstantX on mainnet is spectacular guys and almost everything seems to work so far and I know I'm repeating myself (from user Talon) but the crash bug system hang activated by choosing =>.1 in fee payments in the windows version is still active and does this:--

upload_2015-2-10_14-48-36.png

and this on in problem details when ending the program:-
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
Application Name: darkcoin.exe
Application Version: 0.11.1.19
Application Timestamp: 52cf3800
Hang Signature: bfdf
Hang Type: 0

Locale ID: 2057
Additional Hang Signature 1: bfdfa224e37d2743f3f9b1a7662b1cc4
Additional Hang Signature 2: 0b2e
Additional Hang Signature 3: 0b2e164a5e80e4e27181c3a755313bdc
Additional Hang Signature 4: bfdf
Additional Hang Signature 5: bfdfa224e37d2743f3f9b1a7662b1cc4
Additional Hang Signature 6: 0b2e
Additional Hang Signature 7: 0b2e164a5e80e4e27181c3a755313bdc

Hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flare and moli
moli

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
This is just a record for the history of testing Darkcoin InstantX (before this thread is closed).... That I mined 3000 tDRKs on the new Testnet after Evan broke the old one!

upload_2015-2-10_14-33-33.png

:D:D:D:D:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sub-Ether and yidakee
Sub-Ether

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
moli said:
This is just a record for the history of testing Darkcoin InstantX (before this thread is closed).... That I mined 3000 tDRKs on the new Testnet after Evan broke the old one!

View attachment 989

:D:D:D:D:D
Click to expand...
Just for the record part 2.
On the new testnet, I was up to 12000 test darkcoin on 8 heavily overclocked cores when 'somebody' (wink,wink) attacked the blockchain, forked it and caused my wallet to have random numbers and crash, on reset I had nothing, starting again, I only got upto 4,000 but they stayed in the wallet, must have been on the correct fork with no stealth attacker in the shade this time, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli
moli

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
Sub-Ether said:
Just for the record part 2.
On the new testnet, I was up to 12000 test darkcoin on 8 heavily overclocked cores when 'somebody' (wink,wink) attacked the blockchain, forked it and caused my wallet to have random numbers and crash, on reset I had nothing, starting again, I only got upto 4,000 but they stayed in the wallet, must have been on the correct fork with no stealth attacker in the shade this time, lol.
Click to expand...
Did that happen yesterday? I must have missed the fork because I wasn't on most of the day! lol..
You should put up a screenshot for the record... I don't think we'll walk this path again... It's been an insanely fun time! :)
 
TaoOfSatoshi

TaoOfSatoshi

Grizzled Member
Jul 15, 2014
2,815
2,621
1,183
Dash Nation
www.dashnation.com
eduffield Just wanted to share my first InstantX mainnet experience with you. I InstantX'd some coins to another account, and I thought it went well (InstantX verified). Then I booted up the receiving wallet, and the transaction was not there. I rebooted the sending wallet, and the transaction had reverted to POW transaction with no confirms.
I don't know if that's a known issue or not, I will send you debug logs on request.
 
oblox

oblox

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,032
537
183
moli said:
Did that happen yesterday? I must have missed the fork because I wasn't on most of the day! lol..
You should put up a screenshot for the record... I don't think we'll walk this path again... It's been an insanely fun time! :)
Click to expand...
You cheap skate only sending me 20 and 100 tx's with your fat stacks! :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli
moli

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
What do these mean on Testnet right now?

15:32:39
spork SPORK_1_MASTERNODE_PAYMENTS_ENFORCEMENT 1523519981

15:32:39
failure

15:53:07
spork SPORK_3_INSTANTX_BLOCK_FILTERING 1523519981

15:53:07
failure

15:53:33
spork SPORK_4_RECONVERGE 1523519981

15:53:33
failure
Click to expand...
 
Sub-Ether

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
TaoOfSatoshi said:
eduffield Just wanted to share my first InstantX mainnet experience with you. I InstantX'd some coins to another account, and I thought it went well (InstantX verified). Then I booted up the receiving wallet, and the transaction was not there. I rebooted the sending wallet, and the transaction had reverted to POW transaction with no confirms.
I don't know if that's a known issue or not, I will send you debug logs on request.
Click to expand...
TaoOfSatoshi, I think Evan said the lock would dissappear if the wallet was reset or after 1 hour goes back to POW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TaoOfSatoshi
moli

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
I just tried to InstantX a transaction on Mainnet and it failed also:

At first:
Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 12 of 20 signatures )
Date: 2/11/2015 00:58
From: unknown
To: XoNGxnL9wqgbJpQQncqtyMGaKhtJMjBZz4 (own address, label: Wallet 2)
Credit: 1.00 DRK
Net amount: +1.00 DRK
Transaction ID: ce2cdc78932f56c06a1d919eec8fed532a979f6b7110bcc8321b25b6c14af018-000

Later:
Status: 3/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)
Date: 2/11/2015 00:58
From: unknown
To: XoNGxnL9wqgbJpQQncqtyMGaKhtJMjBZz4 (own address, label: Wallet 2)
Credit: 1.00 DRK
Net amount: +1.00 DRK
Transaction ID: ce2cdc78932f56c06a1d919eec8fed532a979f6b7110bcc8321b25b6c14af018-000

https://drk.mn/blocks.html shows about 37.77% Masternodes have updated to v.11.1.19. I guess we have to wait for most of them updated to have a better grasp at InstantX on Mainnet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhkien
Stealth923

Stealth923

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
352
404
233
Yeah we are only at 46% Masternodes being updated - gotta wait until everyone updates for the network to properly service all transactions.
 
HowlingMad

HowlingMad

Member
Jul 12, 2014
100
23
68
Right now on Mainnet, 58.2 % of MN are at 11.1.19. I sent an InstantX transaction to myself between wallets. The trans got to 14 of 20 of IX verification and then failed. Yesterday, I tried one and it failed at 9 of 20, so getting better.

Status: 2/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)Date: 2/11/2015 06:41From: unknownTo: Xccis83MLP4ijwSpP4MMTWzDYAfgBBv5UD (own address, label: MN1)Credit: 1.7310714 DRKNet amount: +1.7310714 DRKTransaction ID: 8f7db82f2473685bb2788951c952e0c4f77058197bc2b8e9a990b743b103c465-000
 
CODERsp

CODERsp

Member
Jul 5, 2014
114
35
78
HowlingMad said:
Right now on Mainnet, 58.2 % of MN are at 11.1.19. I sent an InstantX transaction to myself between wallets. The trans got to 14 of 20 of IX verification and then failed. Yesterday, I tried one and it failed at 9 of 20, so getting better.

Status: 2/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)Date: 2/11/2015 06:41From: unknownTo: Xccis83MLP4ijwSpP4MMTWzDYAfgBBv5UD (own address, label: MN1)Credit: 1.7310714 DRKNet amount: +1.7310714 DRKTransaction ID: 8f7db82f2473685bb2788951c952e0c4f77058197bc2b8e9a990b743b103c465-000
Click to expand...
I've got 5 of 20 signatures now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom