Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

Discussion in 'Testing' started by eduffield, Feb 1, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. yidakee

    yidakee Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,812
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    283
    post your addy, itching to get rid of some of mine :tongue:
     
  2. Propulsion

    Propulsion The buck stops here.

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,008
    Likes Received:
    467
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Dash Address:
    XerHCGryyfZttUc6mnuRY3FNJzU1Jm9u5L
    Lol awesome Yidakee. y9RuivASms4rLdC1LNHQhsg7YhFTJgCrVR
     
  3. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    looks like the 1000 input amounts may still form a problem with InstantX..
     
  4. eduffield

    eduffield Core Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    5,319
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I just activated 2 sporks, you should see them now
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. eduffield

    eduffield Core Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    5,319
    Trophy Points:
    183
    That's a strange bug... thanks
     
  6. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    cool..

    {
    "SPORK_1_MASTERNODE_PAYMENTS_ENFORCEMENT" : 1423519981,
    "SPORK_3_INSTANTX_BLOCK_FILTERING" : 1423519981
    }
     
  7. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    No problem with higher than 1000 amounts btw :

    Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 27 node(s)
    Date: 9-2-2015 23:12
    To: y9RuivASms4rLdC1LNHQhsg7YhFTJgCrVR
    Debit: -1234.5678 tDRK
    Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
    Net amount: -1234.5778 tDRK
    Transaction ID: 9af34c2f86a0e5948d2f47cbfbfcc9c3e9aefdb9d7bf715c7e9eb4369fd15820-000

    * will just need 1 POW confirmation to get fully confirmed

    ** eh, and we may need a bit more mining hash power to get to next block ...
    edit : never mind.. looks like we are moving on again
     
  8. whocares

    whocares Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Sent some DS+IX, but got the error mentioned above.

    Sender:
    Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 15 node(s)
    Date: 10.2.2015 г. 00:06
    To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx
    Debit: -10.00 tDRK
    Transaction fee: -0.100101 tDRK
    Net amount: -10.100101 tDRK
    Transaction ID: 11971796ba431617a087f2a5b2f651902fc74ede9978ed5e65fe7f0b24f0bd23-000

    Receiver:
    Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx)
    Date: 10.2.2015 г. 00:06From: unknown
    To: yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx (own address)
    Credit: 10.00 tDRK
    Net amount: +10.00 tDRK
    Transaction ID: 11971796ba431617a087f2a5b2f651902fc74ede9978ed5e65fe7f0b24f0bd23-000
     
  9. Talon

    Talon New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Sender:
    Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 28 node(s)
    Date: 10/02/2015 00:09
    To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x
    Debit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
    Net amount: -100.01 tDRK
    Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000

    Receiver:
    Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)
    Date: 2015-02-10 00:09
    From: unknown
    To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x (own address, label: Masternode)
    Credit: 100.00 tDRK
    Net amount: +100.00 tDRK
    Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000


    Edit: Receiver cannot send coins using IX. Asking for 6 confirmations
     
    #1029 Talon, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2015
  10. whocares

    whocares Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Regardless of this, coins appeared almost instantly on the balance.
    The problem is on the verification side.

    ix-18.jpg
     
  11. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    yeah, it needs 6 POW confirmations .. right now you only have 1 POW confirmation. You could try selecting another input amount through coin control. See if sending out works then.
     
  12. Talon

    Talon New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Yes i was able to send them non-IX way
     
  13. yidakee

    yidakee Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,812
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    283
    wtf? ... this just popped out of the blue in my ssh window!! ... what the heck is this? had to do CTRL+c to get back to prompt! What be this voodoo ?

    [​IMG]
     
  14. eduffield

    eduffield Core Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    5,319
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I missed a debug message :)
     
    • Like Like x 4
  15. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    here is some stuff from my debug.log : noticing some checkblock failures and orphan blocks.. FYI
    (wallet itself seems to be running fine)


    2015-02-09 22:26:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
    2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20001
    2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20005
    2015-02-09 22:27:12 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
    2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
    2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 9), scriptSig=) Height 2654 bestHeight 2643
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
    2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
    2015-02-09 22:27:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:19999
    2015-02-09 22:31:00 CreateNewLock - New Transaction Lock 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4 !
    2015-02-09 22:31:00 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 128.127.106.235:19999 /Core:0.11.1.18/ : accepted 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4
    2015-02-09 22:32:23 Removing inactive masternode 80.152.228.67:20001
    2015-02-09 22:34:29 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
    2015-02-09 22:34:29 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=000000053f7aa485e833fbb7c1930b96fae303eccaa67784763488d4642281db
    2015-02-09 22:34:29 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(47dc396819b33d2733f580ebcc3f96639f7c96606c2c89f59613d0cb14ef4ef0, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2655 bestHeight 2643
    2015-02-09 22:35:35 ResendWalletTransactions()
    2015-02-09 22:36:17 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(712f7ab7035912ac2c7b5e6e58feb94f589a6f950eac4e42861066ec95592813, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2656 bestHeight 2643
    2015-02-09 22:36:17 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
    2015-02-09 22:36:17 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 1, prev=000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
    2015-02-09 22:36:39 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 16), scriptSig=) Height 2657 bestHeight 2643
    2015-02-09 22:36:40 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 0000000d64f5a49d668de0dea19646f291ecf0e6d2d878452efa4cfbdcdb673c
    2015-02-09 22:36:40 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 2, prev=00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
     
  16. Sub-Ether

    Sub-Ether Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1,254
    Trophy Points:
    183
    The bug Talon spotted is still active, when you tick 'pay transaction fee' =.1 and send darksend only it still crashes. (curiously the instantX only with .1 of transaction fee seems to work now)
    Problem signature:
    Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
    Application Name: darkcoin.exe
    Application Version: 0.11.1.18
    Application Timestamp: 52cf3800
    Hang Signature: a338
    Hang Type: 0

    Locale ID: 2057
    Additional Hang Signature 1: a338d8bd53c652672a93d732701b0700
    Additional Hang Signature 2: e9d2
    Additional Hang Signature 3: e9d240c4226dde87c0ba7734432a7c19
    Additional Hang Signature 4: a338
    Additional Hang Signature 5: a338d8bd53c652672a93d732701b0700
    Additional Hang Signature 6: e9d2
    Additional Hang Signature 7: e9d240c4226dde87c0ba7734432a7c19
     
    #1036 Sub-Ether, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  17. jimbit

    jimbit Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    203
    I was checking my MN and I noticed alot of this directly in the console.

    this is a snippet of the debug log where it started.


    This was a version behind the head.. so I updated darkcoind. maybe ignore this unless it happens again.
     
    #1037 jimbit, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  18. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    reversed (sent it back to sender) my earlier received InstantX transaction after it reached 6 POW confirmations, went through fine :

    Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 28 node(s)
    Date: 9-2-2015 23:47
    To: Test 1 yAS9wHH4wGPRGfaASLXi1y9ddUWaTFxYn8
    Debit: -49.8999 tDRK
    Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
    Net amount: -49.9099 tDRK
    Transaction ID: 2ef3fae5935fd581094767ec67ec3d31a040e29fdbc7a2057fc007ec0a824f0e-000
     
  19. jimbit

    jimbit Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    203
    does the OP have the links to the most recent version we should be running?
     
  20. eduffield

    eduffield Core Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    5,319
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Just testing reconverge, works :D
     
    • Like Like x 6
  21. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    nice to see it working
     
  22. oblox

    oblox Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    537
    Trophy Points:
    183
    eduffield How does the reconverge work? Does it add a centralization aspect to things? Just trying to get down to the nitty gritty.
     
  23. Sub-Ether

    Sub-Ether Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1,254
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Wow Evan!! First time had 100% and you're trying to fork it at same time. Had 11 locks out of 11 transmissions very close together :D:D:D

    upload_2015-2-9_22-59-29.png
     
    • Like Like x 4
  24. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    when you are resending a certain received InstantX input amount make sure it has the following :

    - 6 POW confirmations (can be checked through coin control, input amounts, list mode)
    - exclude 0.01 for the InstantX transaction fee

    so if for example you received 50 tDRK through InstantX and it confirmed POW 6x you will need to select
    through coin control 49.99 if you want to resend that exact same input amount with InstantX as it needs to add that 0.01 fee as well.
     
    #1044 qwizzie, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  25. crowning

    crowning Well-known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Feature request: include the InstantX (if selected) fee into the fee calculation on the "Send" page.

    It's a bit annoying when you copy the amount _after_ fee into the "Amount" field and get the "...total exceeds your balance..." popup when the InstantX fee is added.
     
    • Like Like x 10
  26. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    715
    Trophy Points:
    183
    #1046 qwizzie, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2015
  27. TanteStefana

    TanteStefana Grizzled Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    1,854
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    How did ya test it, I mean, did you have to cause a fork to test? Be back in a bit to see answer, LOL (always taking off...)
     
  28. moocowmoo

    moocowmoo Bovine Bit-flipper
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2014
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Dash Address:
    XmoocowYfrPKUR6p6M5aJZdVntQe71irCX
    As I understand things, it's seeing it's older version cached masternode start from the network. Which is usually a temporary condition. Meaning it'll usually go offline after a while.
    After a protocol bump, you should issue masternode stop/start to make sure your latest version is in the network cache.
    Make sure you send the start from a matching protocol version local wallet!

    No. The coins can stay put.
    You only need issue a masternode start to updated remotes from an updated local wallet.

    Adding back my 2M/s -- was offline for a bit.
     
    #1048 moocowmoo, Feb 9, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2015
  29. spatula

    spatula Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    158
    So I still have a weird issue where when I send an InstantX transaction it will show up as spendable/available on the receiving wallet after one confirmation, but in the transaction details, it will say "InstantX verification in progress, 13 of 20 signatures" and then eventually say "InstantX verification failed"

    Why does it say it failed if it obviously worked?
     
  30. camosoul

    camosoul Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    This happens when dealing with very large amounts on 0.11.0.X on main net, too...

    I decided to take the low to no payments timeframe to remix some coins, sending the blobs around resulted in incorrect fee calculations. This bug may not be solely IX, like the other...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.