v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Propulsion

Propulsion

The buck stops here.
Feb 26, 2014
1,008
468
183
Dash Address
XerHCGryyfZttUc6mnuRY3FNJzU1Jm9u5L
Lol awesome Yidakee. y9RuivASms4rLdC1LNHQhsg7YhFTJgCrVR
 
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
whocares said:
Sender:
Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 11 node(s)
Date: 9.2.2015 г. 23:54
To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx
Debit: -1000.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -1000.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: b59844d33cc2931bffca5a0226ddd93146976c682b451e8a30806bbb997e2522-000

Receiver:
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx)
Date: 9.2.2015 г. 23:54
From: unknown
To: yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx (own address)
Credit: 1000.00 tDRK
Net amount: +1000.00 tDRK
Transaction ID: b59844d33cc2931bffca5a0226ddd93146976c682b451e8a30806bbb997e2522-000
Click to expand...
looks like the 1000 input amounts may still form a problem with InstantX..
 
eduffield

eduffield

Core Developer
Mar 9, 2014
1,084
5,320
183
whocares said:
Sender:
Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 11 node(s)
Date: 9.2.2015 г. 23:54
To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx
Debit: -1000.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -1000.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: b59844d33cc2931bffca5a0226ddd93146976c682b451e8a30806bbb997e2522-000

Receiver:
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx)
Date: 9.2.2015 г. 23:54
From: unknown
To: yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx (own address)
Credit: 1000.00 tDRK
Net amount: +1000.00 tDRK
Transaction ID: b59844d33cc2931bffca5a0226ddd93146976c682b451e8a30806bbb997e2522-000
Click to expand...
That's a strange bug... thanks
 
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
No problem with higher than 1000 amounts btw :

Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 27 node(s)
Date: 9-2-2015 23:12
To: y9RuivASms4rLdC1LNHQhsg7YhFTJgCrVR
Debit: -1234.5678 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -1234.5778 tDRK
Transaction ID: 9af34c2f86a0e5948d2f47cbfbfcc9c3e9aefdb9d7bf715c7e9eb4369fd15820-000

* will just need 1 POW confirmation to get fully confirmed

** eh, and we may need a bit more mining hash power to get to next block ...
edit : never mind.. looks like we are moving on again
 
W

whocares

Member
Aug 15, 2014
46
13
48
Sent some DS+IX, but got the error mentioned above.

Sender:
Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification failed), broadcast through 15 node(s)
Date: 10.2.2015 г. 00:06
To: test2 yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx
Debit: -10.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.100101 tDRK
Net amount: -10.100101 tDRK
Transaction ID: 11971796ba431617a087f2a5b2f651902fc74ede9978ed5e65fe7f0b24f0bd23-000

Receiver:
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx)
Date: 10.2.2015 г. 00:06From: unknown
To: yEzvycxnbD26bJ9FhfzQh5XftHVD2V7Ndx (own address)
Credit: 10.00 tDRK
Net amount: +10.00 tDRK
Transaction ID: 11971796ba431617a087f2a5b2f651902fc74ede9978ed5e65fe7f0b24f0bd23-000
 
T

Talon

New Member
Dec 3, 2014
12
2
3
Sender:
Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 28 node(s)
Date: 10/02/2015 00:09
To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x
Debit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -100.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000

Receiver:
Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)
Date: 2015-02-10 00:09
From: unknown
To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x (own address, label: Masternode)
Credit: 100.00 tDRK
Net amount: +100.00 tDRK
Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000


Edit: Receiver cannot send coins using IX. Asking for 6 confirmations
 
Last edited by a moderator:
W

whocares

Member
Aug 15, 2014
46
13
48
Regardless of this, coins appeared almost instantly on the balance.
The problem is on the verification side.

ix-18.jpg
 
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
Talon said:
Sender:
Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 28 node(s)
Date: 10/02/2015 00:09
To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x
Debit: -100.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -100.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000

Receiver:
Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification failed)
Date: 2015-02-10 00:09
From: unknown
To: yB72oQzEP1J1CFvcLS8NkcombZxajuye3x (own address, label: Masternode)
Credit: 100.00 tDRK
Net amount: +100.00 tDRK
Transaction ID: a8e596353d276d7d0d5ad77acde43b48e43c1a8822186cafc2286eb56ff4c812-000


Receiver cannot send coins. Asking for 6 confirmations
Click to expand...
yeah, it needs 6 POW confirmations .. right now you only have 1 POW confirmation. You could try selecting another input amount through coin control. See if sending out works then.
 
T

Talon

New Member
Dec 3, 2014
12
2
3
qwizzie said:
yeah, it needs 6 POW confirmations .. right now you only have 1 POW confirmation. You could try selecting another input amount through coin control. See if sending out works then.
Click to expand...
Yes i was able to send them non-IX way
 
yidakee

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
wtf? ... this just popped out of the blue in my ssh window!! ... what the heck is this? had to do CTRL+c to get back to prompt! What be this voodoo ?

 
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
here is some stuff from my debug.log : noticing some checkblock failures and orphan blocks.. FYI
(wallet itself seems to be running fine)


2015-02-09 22:26:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20001
2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20005
2015-02-09 22:27:12 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:13 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 9), scriptSig=) Height 2654 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:19999
2015-02-09 22:31:00 CreateNewLock - New Transaction Lock 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4 !
2015-02-09 22:31:00 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 128.127.106.235:19999 /Core:0.11.1.18/ : accepted 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4
2015-02-09 22:32:23 Removing inactive masternode 80.152.228.67:20001
2015-02-09 22:34:29 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
2015-02-09 22:34:29 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=000000053f7aa485e833fbb7c1930b96fae303eccaa67784763488d4642281db
2015-02-09 22:34:29 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(47dc396819b33d2733f580ebcc3f96639f7c96606c2c89f59613d0cb14ef4ef0, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2655 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:35:35 ResendWalletTransactions()
2015-02-09 22:36:17 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(712f7ab7035912ac2c7b5e6e58feb94f589a6f950eac4e42861066ec95592813, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2656 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:36:17 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
2015-02-09 22:36:17 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 1, prev=000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
2015-02-09 22:36:39 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 16), scriptSig=) Height 2657 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:36:40 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 0000000d64f5a49d668de0dea19646f291ecf0e6d2d878452efa4cfbdcdb673c
2015-02-09 22:36:40 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 2, prev=00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
 
Sub-Ether

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,254
183
eduffield said:
I just activated 2 sporks, you should see them now
Click to expand...
The bug Talon spotted is still active, when you tick 'pay transaction fee' =.1 and send darksend only it still crashes. (curiously the instantX only with .1 of transaction fee seems to work now)
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
Application Name: darkcoin.exe
Application Version: 0.11.1.18
Application Timestamp: 52cf3800
Hang Signature: a338
Hang Type: 0

Locale ID: 2057
Additional Hang Signature 1: a338d8bd53c652672a93d732701b0700
Additional Hang Signature 2: e9d2
Additional Hang Signature 3: e9d240c4226dde87c0ba7734432a7c19
Additional Hang Signature 4: a338
Additional Hang Signature 5: a338d8bd53c652672a93d732701b0700
Additional Hang Signature 6: e9d2
Additional Hang Signature 7: e9d240c4226dde87c0ba7734432a7c19
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Talon
jimbit

jimbit

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
May 23, 2014
229
103
203
I was checking my MN and I noticed alot of this directly in the console.
************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()



************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=6 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()
Click to expand...

this is a snippet of the debug log where it started.

2015-02-09 21:16:06 receive version message: /Core:0.11.1.17/: version 70065, blocks=2633, us=54.203.31.12:57243, them=95.85.48.49:19999, peer=95.85.4
8.49:19999
2015-02-09 21:16:06 Added time data, samples 63, offset +0 (+0 minutes)
2015-02-09 21:16:06 nTimeOffset = +0 (+0 minutes)
2015-02-09 21:16:24 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:34 dsee - Got updated entry for 198.50.148.87:19999
2015-02-09 21:16:35 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:36 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:39 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:42 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:45 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:50 dsee - Got updated entry for 92.222.10.179:19999
2015-02-09 21:16:52 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:16:56 CActiveMasternode::Dseep() - SendDarkSendElectionEntryPing vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(0e784f7f5cce236476fac3ed461c620a0049efffa151f19a0
88dea3932f6934c, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-02-09 21:17:02 dsee - Got updated entry for 85.214.22.190:19999
2015-02-09 21:17:07 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:17:15 dsee - Got updated entry for 81.169.177.196:19999
2015-02-09 21:17:22 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:17:22 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.109.104:19999
2015-02-09 21:17:25 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:17:25 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.109.104:19999
2015-02-09 21:17:46 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 3
2015-02-09 21:17:56 CActiveMasternode::Dseep() - SendDarkSendElectionEntryPing vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(0e784f7f5cce236476fac3ed461c620a0049efffa151f19a088dea3932f6934c, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-02-09 21:18:10 dseg - Sent 1 masternode entries to 54.67.108.202:46234
2015-02-09 21:18:32 receive version message: /darkcoinseeder:0.1.2/: version 70065, blocks=0, us=54.203.31.12:19999, them=0.0.0.0:0, peer=54.88.201.9:44231
2015-02-09 21:18:56 CActiveMasternode::Dseep() - SendDarkSendElectionEntryPing vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(0e784f7f5cce236476fac3ed461c620a0049efffa151f19a088dea3932f6934c, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-02-09 21:19:31 partner 185.66.87.183:35678 using obsolete version 70046; disconnecting
2015-02-09 21:19:31 ProcessMessage(version, 105 bytes) FAILED
2015-02-09 21:19:46 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 3 | 3
2015-02-09 21:19:56 CActiveMasternode::Dseep() - SendDarkSendElectionEntryPing vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(0e784f7f5cce236476fac3ed461c620a0049efffa151f19a088dea3932f6934c, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-02-09 21:20:25

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range
CInv::GetCommand() : type=7 unknown type
darkcoin in ProcessMessages()
Click to expand...

This was a version behind the head.. so I updated darkcoind. maybe ignore this unless it happens again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Sub-Ether
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
reversed (sent it back to sender) my earlier received InstantX transaction after it reached 6 POW confirmations, went through fine :

Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 28 node(s)
Date: 9-2-2015 23:47
To: Test 1 yAS9wHH4wGPRGfaASLXi1y9ddUWaTFxYn8
Debit: -49.8999 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -49.9099 tDRK
Transaction ID: 2ef3fae5935fd581094767ec67ec3d31a040e29fdbc7a2057fc007ec0a824f0e-000
 
jimbit

jimbit

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
May 23, 2014
229
103
203
does the OP have the links to the most recent version we should be running?
 
eduffield

eduffield

Core Developer
Mar 9, 2014
1,084
5,320
183
qwizzie said:
here is some stuff from my debug.log : noticing some checkblock failures and orphan blocks.. FYI
(wallet itself seems to be running fine)


2015-02-09 22:26:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20001
2015-02-09 22:26:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:20005
2015-02-09 22:27:12 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:12 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:13 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 9), scriptSig=) Height 2654 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:13 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment(1|10000000000) or payee(0|yKXk5rYw3Gp8b6dQB5FqvPE3vwYVDkETq4) nHeight 2644.
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment or payee
2015-02-09 22:27:13 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-02-09 22:27:23 Removing inactive masternode 79.169.179.111:19999
2015-02-09 22:31:00 CreateNewLock - New Transaction Lock 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4 !
2015-02-09 22:31:00 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 128.127.106.235:19999 /Core:0.11.1.18/ : accepted 4d678984171ccd8c1333702fe02da7954b242c5e2efc70ffc638d70d043c53c4
2015-02-09 22:32:23 Removing inactive masternode 80.152.228.67:20001
2015-02-09 22:34:29 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
2015-02-09 22:34:29 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=000000053f7aa485e833fbb7c1930b96fae303eccaa67784763488d4642281db
2015-02-09 22:34:29 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(47dc396819b33d2733f580ebcc3f96639f7c96606c2c89f59613d0cb14ef4ef0, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2655 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:35:35 ResendWalletTransactions()
2015-02-09 22:36:17 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(712f7ab7035912ac2c7b5e6e58feb94f589a6f950eac4e42861066ec95592813, 0), scriptSig=) Height 2656 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:36:17 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
2015-02-09 22:36:17 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 1, prev=000000063c57eb594b723454cca21636627a24ac8578e1da8cbbe5d9d2568ffc
2015-02-09 22:36:39 mnw - winning vote CTxIn(COutPoint(a965b7a1e5533cfc1caada72899b1f5db83e3b6cb74d61302892ec10f11f2692, 16), scriptSig=) Height 2657 bestHeight 2643
2015-02-09 22:36:40 CheckBlock() : Skipping masternode payment check - nHeight 2644 Hash 0000000d64f5a49d668de0dea19646f291ecf0e6d2d878452efa4cfbdcdb673c
2015-02-09 22:36:40 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 2, prev=00000003d48d340ac65dcfee11d2bb564244ab99853c9ae386e4f7298baf6dc0
Click to expand...
Just testing reconverge, works :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli, GNULinuxGuy, Raico and 3 others
oblox

oblox

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,032
537
183
eduffield How does the reconverge work? Does it add a centralization aspect to things? Just trying to get down to the nitty gritty.
 
qwizzie

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,628
780
183
when you are resending a certain received InstantX input amount make sure it has the following :

- 6 POW confirmations (can be checked through coin control, input amounts, list mode)
- exclude 0.01 for the InstantX transaction fee

so if for example you received 50 tDRK through InstantX and it confirmed POW 6x you will need to select
through coin control 49.99 if you want to resend that exact same input amount with InstantX as it needs to add that 0.01 fee as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: moli
crowning

crowning

Well-known Member
May 29, 2014
1,415
1,997
183
Alpha Centauri Bc
eduffield said:
***************************** Please update to 11.1.18 : InstantX Release *****************************
Click to expand...
Feature request: include the InstantX (if selected) fee into the fee calculation on the "Send" page.

It's a bit annoying when you copy the amount _after_ fee into the "Amount" field and get the "...total exceeds your balance..." popup when the InstantX fee is added.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNULinuxGuy, moli, splawik21 and 7 others
moocowmoo

moocowmoo

Bovine Bit-flipper
Foundation Member
Jun 15, 2014
483
603
263
masternode.me
Dash Address
XmoocowYfrPKUR6p6M5aJZdVntQe71irCX
yidakee said:
Version + protocol bump, but masternode again started automatically without "masternode start"
Is the "masternode start" needed only for cold.remote setup?
Click to expand...
As I understand things, it's seeing it's older version cached masternode start from the network. Which is usually a temporary condition. Meaning it'll usually go offline after a while.
After a protocol bump, you should issue masternode stop/start to make sure your latest version is in the network cache.
Make sure you send the start from a matching protocol version local wallet!

TanteStefana said:
Question from Mangled Blue, and now from me as well ;) :

So - I assume -->>>> - Version bump / protocol bump
This means that we'll need to make new wallet.dat file(s) and send all coins to updated wallet.dat file, upon mainnet release??

please inform, if in the know :)
Click to expand...
No. The coins can stay put.
You only need issue a masternode start to updated remotes from an updated local wallet.

yidakee said:
Did someone pull out their miners?
Click to expand...
Adding back my 2M/s -- was offline for a bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
spatula

spatula

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Oct 31, 2014
49
39
158
So I still have a weird issue where when I send an InstantX transaction it will show up as spendable/available on the receiving wallet after one confirmation, but in the transaction details, it will say "InstantX verification in progress, 13 of 20 signatures" and then eventually say "InstantX verification failed"

Why does it say it failed if it obviously worked?
 
camosoul

camosoul

Grizzled Member
Sep 19, 2014
2,261
1,130
1,183
crowning said:
Feature request: include the InstantX (if selected) fee into the fee calculation on the "Send" page.

It's a bit annoying when you copy the amount _after_ fee into the "Amount" field and get the "...total exceeds your balance..." popup when the InstantX fee is added.
Click to expand...
This happens when dealing with very large amounts on 0.11.0.X on main net, too...

I decided to take the low to no payments timeframe to remix some coins, sending the blobs around resulted in incorrect fee calculations. This bug may not be solely IX, like the other...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom