v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

[test3r]

IX

Status: 8 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 1 node(s)Date: 2/5/2015 23:11To: Sub-Ether yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -15.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -15.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 21f4012202bec099de605909dbf1b09b037959ca8caa632c0e21a47a3628e305-000

Tomorrow ill setup a pc and a laptop to see exactly if every IX is IX :grin:

 

[qwizzie]

Happened to me twice in a row, without using coin control. Waited 15 minutes, still no broadcast.
After restart they are listed as normal transaction (as it should be) but never get a confirmation.

-zapwallettxes removes them, but they shouldn't be in this state at all.

yeah, i tried to do that InstantX transaction again after i used -zapwallettxes to get rid of that previous stuck transaction and the new InstantX transaction gets stuck
the exact same way .. eventhough that 1000 InstanX got fully POW confirmed by this time.
There seems to be a problem with outgoing InstantX transactions when the wallet has incoming InstantX transaction as well
(regardless if the incoming InstantX has been 6x POW confirmed or not and regardless which input amount you select).

Status: 5/offline (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 5-2-2015 23:25
To: Test Darkcoin 2 y3DUP7joBEXH9Cimh4JM3D9thMebDnRwH5
Debit: -859.755 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.001 tDRK
Net amount: -859.756 tDRK
Transaction ID: 9e826eb3a845f6dbaf33922c67b603fd9ad893d3552c0d7ea7f56bf7b132b666-000

 

[splawik21]

IX no DS within seconds!

 

[thelonecrouton]

DS not working for me with latest version currently. Clicked 'Start Daksend Mixing' an hour ago, 'DS Status: Enabled' but I've had 'Last Darksend message: Darksend is disabled' the whole time. IX seems to be working fine apart from the 'not broadcast yet' thing I mentioned earlier.

 

[qwizzie]

trying to mix some wallets and i'm getting ''conflicted'' transactions from two of them.. they are on the exact same block as my other 4 wallets
which are happily denominating without problems. Will try another -zapwallettxes to see if i can get
those two wallets back on track...

 

[whocares]

Sent 1000 tDRKs(unmixed) to another address via IX but it didn't receive it.



Edit:

Looks like IX is limited to 999 tDRKs

 

[coingun]

Sent 1000 tDRKs(unmixed) to another address via IX but it didn't receive it.

View attachment 913

Edit:

Looks like IX is limited to 999 tDRKs

Damn as I sit here and wait for my new mn to get 15 confirms so I can use moocow's magical masternode maker (http://masternode.me) I can't help but think. Wouldn't IX be nice for masternode setup. HAHA.

 

[whocares]

Received both transactions of 1000 tDRKs after few minutes, but they didn't processed via IX.

 

[coingun]

Received both transactions of 1000 tDRKs after few minutes, but they didn't processed via IX.

So in theory a POS transaction for more then 2500$ in Fiat wouldn't be useable by IX at this point?

 

[vertoe]

could be a security mechanism, like the early darksend limitations. lets ask eduffield about that.

 

[whocares]

So in theory a POS transaction for more then 2500$ in Fiat wouldn't be useable by IX at this point?

Looks like that's the case :smile:.

 

[TanteStefana]

drop a few coins xyAroucC9oqb1Rio7zJibBd6PcMmqoJvTH :grin:

You need to be on testnet, If you are, your address would start with a Y I believe (maybe m or other letters, but not X)

So I take it (because it's grey'd out) that I can't mix my "extra" coins if I'm running masternode, right?

 

[vertoe]

You need to be on testnet, If you are, your address would start with a Y I believe (maybe m or other letters, but not X)

testnet addresses start with x or y.

 

[TanteStefana]

testnet addresses start with x or y.

Oh yah? When did X start getting used? NOONE EVER TOLD ME!!!! WAHHH!

Ok, I'll try sending coins...

 

[vertoe]

Oh yah? When did X start getting used? NOONE EVER TOLD ME!!!! WAHHH!

Ok, I'll try sending coins...

Not X, x! learn to see the difference.

 

[coingun]

Oh yah? When did X start getting used? NOONE EVER TOLD ME!!!! WAHHH!

Ok, I'll try sending coins...

lower case != upper case in this case

 

[whocares]

could be a security mechanism, like the early darksend limitations. lets ask eduffield about that.

Very likely.
Maybe I'm not so familiar about the current limitations that Evan decided to put.
Sorry if I made some guesses that are not in place.

 

[TanteStefana]

Ok, so is anyone working on breaking this? I don't know how But flair started out here by breaking things, is he trying to break it now? I'd love to hear from people hacking the system, the more the better! Anyone trying? If not, if you can, it'd sure be appreciated!!!

 

[TanteStefana]

lower case != upper case in this case

You do know I'm being silly, right?

 

[TanteStefana]

That's strange, my instantX transaction, minutes later, now says this: Status: 3/unconfirmed, broadcast through 9 node(s) Why did it go from confirmed via instantX to unconfirmed?

Status: 3/unconfirmed, broadcast through 9 node(s)Date: 2/5/2015 16:12To: test3r xyAroucC9oqb1Rio7zJibBd6PcMmqoJvTHDebit: -10.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.100101 tDRKNet amount: -10.100101 tDRKTransaction ID: 88eda94936a9ee86e578e63defc35d6aac9433cf19505935fb4a7305690ef37f-000

Same with this one, done earlier. Still has red number where as the later transaction now has black numbers

Status: 3/unconfirmed, broadcast through 2 node(s)Date: 2/5/2015 16:03To: y2NevUPYyY4Vh4s71Wy6PHLEisEepqNRmNDebit: -5.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.100051 tDRKNet amount: -5.100051 tDRKTransaction ID: f3cd6aae8d261611d2b08e83b2c34a33006f882b5546b2982bc33ea1867555c1-000

Er... then red numbers, then black numbers

Does this mean my instant X didn't go through and does it mean I'm having troubles?