• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

v0.10.17.x Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
qwizzie said:
i think right now InstantX works intermittently, sometimes it gets broadcasted to masternodes and will work instantly .. other times it will not get broadcast to masternodes
and will then be confirmed through POW.
Click to expand...

To me it seems non-D+ needs 1 PoW confirm to get through.

Moli just sent me 10, went unconfirmed with 0, block was found and immediately became spendable with 1x PoW.

.
 
yidakee said:
InstantX only works if whoever receives it gets it confirmed and spendable. Otherwise it doesn´t make sense. It seems that D+ solves the cosmetic bug and doesn't waint for 1x block to be resolved.

Anyone can confirm an absolutely not-D+ tx is confirmed InstantX without 1x blocks being solved?

(went out for lunch. Whoever sent me 19.9995 tDRK, sorry, was out)
Click to expand...
Three times I tried and darksend IX still must be confirmed by 1 POW conf
 
I've got a test plan template that I wrote for one of my clients recently. I think it might be useful to try to map out a proper test plan in addition to our adhoc and ping pong testing. I'll see if I have time to make a start on it this afternoon.
 
Just for reference, I've been using D+ as abbreviation to darksend... I will change to DS
 
Yidakee. The 10DRK that I sent you using a normal transaction seems to have confirmed faster than the one I sent using DS. Is that what you are seeing in your transaction list?
 
upload_2014-11-29_15-18-58.png
 
stonehedge said:
View attachment 663
Click to expand...

It was so damn fast I can't be sure. Should have warned me first :tongue: 4/6 and spendable...

EDIT:

Getting mega spammed with from 5 distinct IP's (as far as I can tell)

11-29 15:24:29 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 191.235.132.246:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
2014-11-29 15:24:29 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
2014-11-29 15:24:29 InstantX::DoConsensusVote - Not masternode
2014-11-29 15:24:29 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 50.254.73.150:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
11-29 15:25:28 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 85.214.22.190:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
2014-11-29 15:25:28 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
2014-11-29 15:25:28 InstantX::DoConsensusVote - Not masternode
2014-11-29 15:25:28 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 191.235.132.246:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
2014-11-29 15:25:28 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
2014-11-29 15:25:28 InstantX::DoConsensusVote - Not masternode
2014-11-29 15:25:28 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 168.63.151.85:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
-11-29 15:26:31 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 107.170.120.125:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
2014-11-29 15:26:31 trying connection 74.66.245.204:19999 lastseen=1.1days
2014-11-29 15:26:31 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
2014-11-29 15:26:31 InstantX::DoConsensusVote - Not masternode
2014-11-29 15:26:31 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 50.254.73.150:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00af6bed95d551a175e6207df773ed5db12a147a7b7fbaa53987f78b6a7
2014-11-29 15:26:31 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq
2014-11-29 15:26:31 InstantX::DoConsensusVote - Not masternode
2014-11-29 15:26:31 ProcessMessageInstantX::txlreq - Transaction Lock Request: 85.214.22.190:19999 /Satoshi:0.10.17.2/ : rejected 8f71e00a
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of my InstantX transactions are not getting correctly registered it seems (created from sender wallet but not received at target wallet)

krMkJiy.jpg
 
Windows wallet v.101702 just crashed when I was trying to look at a transaction detail. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey stonehedge,

Sent you 2 DRK.

All I see is only 2/unconfirmed 1 node.

Thought we should see 6 confirmations?
 
I think we need version 3 now, my windows wallet won't sync.

EDIT: Restarted, it's synced now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top