v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

[vertoe]

New p2pool with worker tracker http://54.179.187.196:18998/static/

 

[darkzero]

Can anybody send 1K tDRK to my63g87UR36Kdov6m2SBMAmRGAsjWSDX7j to start a MN ?
Thanks

 

[Light]

Please test this one, font issue should be fixed.

http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DOD-DRK-48/artifact/QTL/gitian-osx-darkcoin/DarkCoin-Qt.dmg

Yes, the font issue is resolved. The wallet at bitcoin.io also had the same issue. Please replace it with the fixed one as well. Thanks.

 

[chaeplin]

Seems there is something odd with subsidy detection, too.

Maybe you can add this "equlto:" and "inmlist:" display from mainnet, too?

Subsidy and equlto fixed.

 

[chaeplin]

I have a question.
What happen if a wallet is encrypted ?

Statble and encrypted RC clients will not join anonymization phase ? Isn't it ?

 

[BrainShutdown]

Can someone with excess tDRK send 1k to each of these addresses?
mqJWHUEf1w9i6nGzfrpUWUg2oovwgDSb7V
mu2EV6HqFEDZWdXEKmeNQVGWLxadLPXRAG
Thanks :wink:

 

[chaeplin]

Can someone with excess tDRK send 1k to each of these addresses?
mqJWHUEf1w9i6nGzfrpUWUg2oovwgDSb7V
mu2EV6HqFEDZWdXEKmeNQVGWLxadLPXRAG
Thanks :wink:

sent

 

[chaeplin]

Some mistake using dump and import private key.
I have a test nm using address http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/mpuD7ci4Y3PA8THoHCWz7GfAZSrnGTSgCf
Key is dumped and imported.

As I am using CLI darkcoind, I have sent 1800 to a address using sendfrom a to 1800.
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/f33778837cf69b56543708c149e08c857ddf8a9f13f12fba4e37386b329b9bb0

mpuD7ci4Y3PA8THoHCWz7GfAZSrnGTSgCf is included as input. NM is down.

Interesting listtransactions result.

Original wallet : fee 0

   {
        "account" : "0",
        "address" : "mmwGeqnnMBRU6cUTP25gZvGi7fsMVSErQX",
        "category" : "send",
        "amount" : -1800.00000000,
        "fee" : 0.00000000,
        "confirmations" : 25,
        "blockhash" : "000000003d095e6acc6c315b6513d146f809c9b16de6bf7cac3ba3bb12e5ad87",
        "blockindex" : 1,
        "blocktime" : 1405863634,
        "txid" : "f33778837cf69b56543708c149e08c857ddf8a9f13f12fba4e37386b329b9bb0",
        "time" : 1405863390,
        "timereceived" : 1405863390
    },

Wallet have the key mpuD7ci4Y3PA8THoHCWz7GfAZSrnGTSgCf.
fee : 800

   {
        "account" : "",
        "address" : "mmwGeqnnMBRU6cUTP25gZvGi7fsMVSErQX",
        "category" : "send",
        "amount" : -1800.00000000,
        "fee" : 800.00000000,
        "confirmations" : 24,
        "blockhash" : "000000003d095e6acc6c315b6513d146f809c9b16de6bf7cac3ba3bb12e5ad87",
        "blockindex" : 1,
        "blocktime" : 1405863634,
        "txid" : "f33778837cf69b56543708c149e08c857ddf8a9f13f12fba4e37386b329b9bb0",
        "time" : 1405863634,
        "timereceived" : 1405867230
    },

Yes it's cosmetic.
1800 out, this wallet actually has 1000, but output is -1800, so 800 is displayed as fee(real : 0 fee)

 

[g8F98FF3gjafogj4]

Cannot cash my coins out of the http://ec2-54-91-161-78.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ pool.

Evan is admin of this pool and likely sleeping now.

Same here. Will spread tdrk wealth when we get em.

 

[chaeplin]

check the tx you sent, I think 1000 tdrk is vout #1 and payout is vout #0

Maybe it's testing ?

2014-07-20 15:29:37 received block 0000000122c236c9a0d2a3d35d00172654d3fab745965ae62cab867c7ea081bc peer=9
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - found a winner
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - strong consessus
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - Masternode payment to OP_DUP OP_HASH160 4371cc819907ca3cdee15a07a61f1894705d6059 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
2014-07-20 15:29:37 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment. Found Amount 1 Found Payee 0 
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - found a winner
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - strong consessus
2014-07-20 15:29:37 MasternodeConsessus - Masternode payment to OP_DUP OP_HASH160 4371cc819907ca3cdee15a07a61f1894705d6059 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
2014-07-20 15:29:37 CheckBlock() : Couldn't find masternode payment. Found Amount 1 Found Payee 0 
2014-07-20 15:29:37 Committing 4 changed transactions to coin database...
2014-07-20 15:29:37 SetBestChain: new best=0000000122c236c9a0d2a3d35d00172654d3fab745965ae62cab867c7ea081bc  height=874  log2_work=40.927009  tx=957  date=2014-07-20 15:27:47 progress=0.038752

2014-07-20 15:32:25 received block 000000002defc648b1c4d00707a504e4f50fb53ae2ec32ad189eec9bf0b85224 peer=31
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - found a winner
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - strong consessus
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - Masternode payment to OP_DUP OP_HASH160 4371cc819907ca3cdee15a07a61f1894705d6059 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - found a winner
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - strong consessus
2014-07-20 15:32:25 MasternodeConsessus - Masternode payment to OP_DUP OP_HASH160 4371cc819907ca3cdee15a07a61f1894705d6059 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
2014-07-20 15:32:25 Committing 4 changed transactions to coin database...
2014-07-20 15:32:25 SetBestChain: new best=000000002defc648b1c4d00707a504e4f50fb53ae2ec32ad189eec9bf0b85224  height=875  log2_work=40.929474  tx=958  date=2014-07-20 15:32:20 progress=0.038792

Actually getblocktemplate return vout #0 hmmm

 

[eduffield]

Same here. Will spread tdrk wealth when we get em.

Fixed!

 

[eduffield]

I have a question.
What happen if a wallet is encrypted ?
Statble and encrypted RC clients will not join anonymization phase ? Isn't it ?

The client will need to ask for the passphrase to unlock the wallet when it detects it needs to anonymize funds. After it done anonymizing fund it's will lock the wallet again.

 

[chaeplin]

Got first denominate

darktest@sv2:~/.darkcoin/testnet3> darkcoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 101200,
    "protocolversion" : 70019,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 159.00000000,
    "blocks" : 501,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 11,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.39856835,
    "testnet" : true,
    "keypoololdest" : 1405792864,
    "keypoolsize" : 1001,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : ""
}

2014-07-19 23:16:19 Committing 2 changed transactions to coin database...
2014-07-19 23:16:19 SetBestChain: new best=00000001c346ffce322015052b867a0638d5cd4cf621c1c9fa3c971d90e9d361  height=500  log2_work=37.693024  tx=506  date=2014-07-19 23:16:13 progress=0.020574
2014-07-19 23:16:19 UpdatedWithin 1405811779106905, 1405810565288805 --  1
2014-07-19 23:16:19 UpdatedWithin 1405811779106918, 1405810565288805 --  1
2014-07-19 23:16:19 found coins 4
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 400000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 14700000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19 DoAutomaticDenominating : Running darksend denominate for 151 coins
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 10000000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 1000000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 100000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 10000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 1000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- den 100000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- nValueRet 0, nTargetValue 15100200000, nValueRet >= nTargetValue 0
2014-07-19 23:16:19 found coins 4
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 400000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 14700000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 400000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19  --- nValueIn 15500000000 nTotalValue 15100200000
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CWallet::LockCoin - COutPoint(6e4445a38dfca638e06cf0522da418cbbcc540347e3cb756fb7ff8e7e05e8469, 3)
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CWallet::LockCoin - COutPoint(709dfe07613b8f2ebccaae6710bc5c247fc6cda0eec98864994f7402b48405b4, 0)
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CWallet::LockCoin - COutPoint(94371b34817f0d3fc5b8e87b59e744f4fb30e42e7acb933b64703bc0c3a555dc, 3)
2014-07-19 23:16:19 found coins 1
2014-07-19 23:16:19  vin nValue 400000000
2014-07-19 23:16:19 keypool reserve 3
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CWallet::LockCoin - COutPoint(af0def78205c137310040e136d659f06a5782a1e89a0e0baeec748e5740663db, 3)
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CDarkSendPool::SendMoney() - Added transaction to pool.
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CDarkSendPool::SendMoney() - Is connected to masternode?.
2014-07-19 23:16:19 UpdatedWithin 1405811779114053, 1405810565288805 --  1
2014-07-19 23:16:19 UpdatedWithin 1405811779114065, 1405810565288805 --  1
2014-07-19 23:16:19 winner 0
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CDarkSendPool::ConnectToBestMasterNode - Connecting to masternode at 98.165.130.67:19999
2014-07-19 23:16:19 Found existing connection
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CDarkSendPool::UpdateState() == 2 | 2
2014-07-19 23:16:19 CDarkSendPool::SendMoney() - connected to masternode.
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- new input CTxIn(COutPoint(6e4445a38dfca638e06cf0522da418cbbcc540347e3cb756fb7ff8e7e05e8469, 3), scriptSig=)
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- new input CTxIn(COutPoint(709dfe07613b8f2ebccaae6710bc5c247fc6cda0eec98864994f7402b48405b4, 0), scriptSig=)
2014-07-19 23:16:19  -- new input CTxIn(COutPoint(94371b34817f0d3fc5b8e87b59e744f4fb30e42e7acb933b64703bc0c3a555dc, 3), scriptSig=)
2014-07-19 23:16:19 RelayDarkSendIn - found master, relaying message - 98.165.130.67:19999
2014-07-19 23:16:19 keypool return 3
2014-07-19 23:16:19 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

I saw DoAutomaticDenominating in every 10th block.
But no darksend denominate happen.

A address in wallet is payee of nomp pool.

I have run a wallet with fixed amount, still no denomination.

 

[eduffield]

I saw DoAutomaticDenominating in every 10th block.
But no darksend denominate happen.

Checking into this

 

[CHAOSiTEC]

not to stick something in everyones wheel, but isnt the new test net addresses starting with n ?? and not with m as the old one

 

[TanteStefana]

sent each 1K.


Post your add. I have 2K TDRK.

I have setup 3 testnet masternodes more.

Thank you chaeplin

Ok, now to be annoying again. I swear it, I swear I checked everything, spelling, location (tried different locations in the darkcoin.conf file) checked to make sure which config file I was looking at and where it was BUT....
I keep getting "you must set masternode=1 in darkcoin.conf file"

I tried locating the masternode=1 at different positions in the file, before the rpcuser/password, after before after around masternodeprivkey

I still keep getting the same error.

I had the same problem earlier, when I couldn't start testnet. It finally started when I (one time out of many) took out the rcp info in the mainnet darkcoin.conf, leaving only the testnet=1. Now, I can't start testnet without having the rpc info in the file.

I redownloaded darkcoin-qt and darkcoind, and still have the problem. I know I'm a dingbat, but I tried being systematic as I could and I keep getting this glitch. Of course it could be my computer.... but since it came up again with issues with my conf files, I figured I better report.

 

[g8F98FF3gjafogj4]

Can anybody send 1K tDRK to my63g87UR36Kdov6m2SBMAmRGAsjWSDX7j to start a MN ?
Thanks

Sent!

 

[vertoe]

not to stick something in everyones wheel, but isnt the new test net addresses starting with n ?? and not with m as the old one

no, the version has not changed. m+n it was before and it is now.

 

[chaeplin]

Thank you chaeplin

Ok, now to be annoying again. I swear it, I swear I checked everything, spelling, location (tried different locations in the darkcoin.conf file) checked to make sure which config file I was looking at and where it was BUT....
I keep getting "you must set masternode=1 in darkcoin.conf file"

I tried locating the masternode=1 at different positions in the file, before the rpcuser/password, after before after around masternodeprivkey

I still keep getting the same error.

I had the same problem earlier, when I couldn't start testnet. It finally started when I (one time out of many) took out the rcp info in the mainnet darkcoin.conf, leaving only the testnet=1. Now, I can't start testnet without having the rpc info in the file.

I redownloaded darkcoin-qt and darkcoind, and still have the problem. I know I'm a dingbat, but I tried being systematic as I could and I keep getting this glitch. Of course it could be my computer.... but since it came up again with issues with my conf files, I figured I better report.

Use

cd ~
pwd

Check result of pwd is user's home

 

[TanteStefana]

The client will need to ask for the passphrase to unlock the wallet when it detects it needs to anonymize funds. After it done anonymizing fund it's will lock the wallet again.

But how long could that last? What I mean is, what if the funds need to wait for other funds for the pool? Could it wind up leaving the wallet unlocked for a period of time?