Are you asking the proposal to mention the technical solution? Or do you want the proposal just to define a bounty that it will be given to the one who will manage to give the technical solution? I think this last is much better because a good amount of dash will motivate serious proposals.
Lets propose an amount, and if the masternodes vote this amount lets propose again a greater amount, and until the masternodes disapprove the final proposal. So the voted-up proposal just before the final disapproved proposal will be the defined bounty
that it will be given to the one who will manage to propose a correct technical solution to the anonymity problem.
All alternative technical solutions that will appear after the bounty is defined, they can be added as proposals into the budget and the one which will manage to get the more yes votes from the masternodes he will win the bounty amount.
Then he will give back to @GrandMasterDash
the 5 dash he lost (according to the above protocol @GrandMasterDash
will lose 5 dash in the final disapproved bounty proposal ).
What do you think about this? The procedure followed in this proposal (although implemented in a cumbersome way) is isomorphic to the alternative budget system
, as long as it is similarly capable to define a bounty to be given for a specific job.
Can you explain the above in formal english, as long as I am not good in writting proposals?
Write whatever you want here