..any gaming of the system becomes apparent pretty quick and other Admins will intervene (as you can see with this thread itself Admins tend to want to police each other).
This is not just gaming the system. This is a vulgar coup of five admins against the rest ones!Incubator Governance (appointing or removing Admins, updating Incubator Rules, Voting) - originally shared by all Admins, now falls under the remit of the following Incubator Governance committee: Cloudwheels, Dashameter, Rion, Sam Kirby, Spectaprod
And this coup was allowed to be proposed (and almost passed ?) due to your flawed incubator rules.
50% agree, it is not similar to 50% dont object! An admin may have heard nothing about an upcoming change, and some others may claim that he does not object! Especially in case the upcoming change refers to the removal of this deaf admin, because he abstains from the money feast of the internal cabal.Dash Incubator Rules
Admins are responsible for Governance of the Incubator which is implemented via appointing or removing Admins, or updating these Rules.
An Admin Quorum is required in both cases, which means that >= 50% agree (or <50% don’t object) to Admin appointments / removals or changes to the Rules.
An obviously flawed rule, one rule to ring them all!