Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

An Open Letter From Evan and Ryan Regarding Dash Marketing

Discussion in 'Official Announcements' started by Ryan Taylor, Jun 28, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    Why the collateral fee of the masternodes is a hardcoded number (1000 dash) and it is not subject of a market negotiation? Why there is a maximum number of Masternodes and you dont let the masternodes to be as many as the market desires? Why you designed this artificial masternodes scarcity?

    While you expect others to obey to the market rules, the Mastenodes aristocracy is deliberately designed (by the core team) to be a market protected element of the community. Why the core team designed this protectionism, for the benefit of the masternodes, and against the will (and the interest) of the whole Dash community?

    If you really like market freedom, apply it to everyone and do not exclude the masternodes (or yourself. Being a salary paid employee, you are not fully exposed to the market, are you?) from it.
     
    #121 demo, Dec 12, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2017
  2. UdjinM6

    UdjinM6 Official Dash Dev
    Dash Core Team Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    3,514
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Let me put it this way:
    Why the total supply is not a subject of market negotiation? Why there is a maximum number of coins and you dont let the coins to be as many as the market desires? Why you designed this artificial coins scarcity?

    If you are argueing that we should lower collateral fee to let more people host MNs, then it was already discussed a million times or so. tl;dr: This would change almost nothing. Assuming that we would lower it N times, current MNOs would just have to maintain N time more nodes which is going to bump their expenses ~N times and would also bump related network traffic N times for everyone else. Plus some new MNOs would join too but their number would be relatively small if not negligible. Overall it's going to be the same system with the same distribution of voting power but with higher expenses for everyone. That's why we are aiming to make trustless shared MNs a reality - it's the way to actually include more people in the governance process without bringing additional expenses and unnecessary traffic bloat.
     
  3. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    The conversation expanded into governance.
     
    #123 Checkerama, Dec 12, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2017
  4. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    You compare the uncomperables. The scarcity of money is unrelated to the scarcity of the masternodes. Some things need to be scarce, while some others dont. I mean , why turn the Masternodes scarce and the collateral fee stable, and not turn the miners scarce and fix the difficulty algorithm so that it will fit to the scarce number of those miners? Do you think the idea of scarce miners is absurd? The same it is with the idea of scarce masternodes.

    Your approach is not scientific. There is no proof that the masternodes should be 10000 and their collateral fee should be 1000 dash. Prove it in a scientific way. For example dynamicaly and mathematicaly relate the hardcoded numbers (10000 and 1000) to the needed (by the community) bandwidth or to the needed (by the community) transactions load, and you may convince me.
     
    #124 demo, Dec 12, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
  5. camosoul

    camosoul Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    1,082
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I'm concerned that increasing granularity will return us to hoardcoin levels of illiquidity.

    The deliberately large chunks needed, and the hurdle of requiring trust in the current model, are the barriers to entry that maintain duffs in a liquid state.

    I understand the objective, but it seems to ignore the trade-off that comes with it... The easier it becomes to hoard, the less will be liquid... The whole point is that it's not easy to hoard 1000 DASH, thus, smaller amounts remain liquid.

    If you make it so that smaller amounts can be tied up just the same... It becomes staking, and nobody will spend.

    Wasn't DASH Digital Cash? Instead, it becomes a hodl/hoard that creates more of itself instead of merely going up in fiat valuation... Same result of not being used as Digital Cash, but by a different failure mode.

    It already is trustless; if you have the appropriately large chunk. The trust model of shares is a feature, not a bug. It's not supposed to be that easy...

    We had this discussion way back when MNs were invented. 1000 was chosen exactly and because of what I just said. Is this yet another category in which DASH has lost it's way? Did you forget?
    No, it would drastically alter the thing nobody wants to talk about anymore, which was the very reason for the choice when MNs were invented. The impact on MN participation and vote dynamics wouldn't change much, but liquidity would shrink to nearly nothing. It'll be PeerCoin all over again.
     
    #125 camosoul, Dec 17, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  6. UdjinM6

    UdjinM6 Official Dash Dev
    Dash Core Team Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    3,514
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    We are thinking about introducing a major/minor share system i.e. to became a masternode some set of shares would have to have at least one major share. And if the major share would be smth like 600 DASH and minor smth like 100 DASH I don't think it would affect the system too much.
     
  7. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    So 1000 dash as a masternode collateral fee, was selected in order to preserve liquidity?
    That's interesting, I never thought about it!
    But how this 1000 number has been selected? Why not 999 or 1001? Is there any math for it?
    Lets say that the masternode collateral fee is reduced to 500 dash, and the masternodes max number remains stable to 10000. Doesn't this increases liquidity?

    You missed some important parameters:
    In order for liquidity to shrink to nearly nothing, you have to both decrease the masternodes collateral fee AND increase the maximum number of masternodes, AND keep stable (or increase) the masternodes reward payment.

    How much to decrease or increase these parameters? Lets vote the numbers of course!
     
    #127 demo, Dec 17, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2017
  8. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    Furthermore, and as long as the above parameters are correlated in order to affect liquidity, you should be able to vote these numbers using sliders.
     
  9. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    862
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I agree, we shouldn't be solely encouraging hoarding. However, having said that, I'm happy with the idea so long as there is a counterweight that encourages spending. Perhaps the hoarding can be linked to merchant discounts in some way?

    Spending X at a listed merchant entitles you to save X for Y days?
     
  10. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68

    YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS someone else that gets it!!!!!!!!
     
  11. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    While it does liberate half of the currency the MNs already possess, it also increases centralization of masternodes - people who now had 1000 DASH will just turn it to 2 masternodes if they can afford it, and the barrier of entry would be that much easier for others already hoarding their DASH and saving it till they can dump it.

    The only way to ensure constant MN rotation is to decrease their reward system by a large amount - theres no reason they should both be winning in both the valuation of their 1000 DASH AND in a 8% return per year of their investment (which right now makes a retardedly large monthly dividend for simply maintaining a server which is, at best, a 100 dollar per month fee)

    upload_2017-12-17_18-35-35.png
     
    #131 Checkerama, Dec 17, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2017
  12. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    862
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Except you forgot to account for the upcoming dedicated hardware, co-location and maintenance costs. Or the redundancy and recovery plan to stay online 24-7 . Trust me, the thought of losing thousands of dollars is a VERY GOOD incentive, not least because dash is competing with other masternode systems.
     
  13. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    754
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Everyone who holds dash, not just Masternode operators, reap the benefits of the increasing valuation of their holdings. I think I mentioned in one of the Reddit threads, this year non-masternode dash holders have made roughly 9500% ROI, and masternode operators (and MN share owners) have made about 10300% ROI, because of the additional 7-8%. If you're claiming that something is unfair about the MN payments, the increase (or decrease) in the value of the currency shouldn't be factored in.
     
  14. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Your common sense seems to be off - did you just breeze over the fact you have 1000 DASH locked as well? So that means you're making over twice as much as the average DASH holder (10300 + 9500).
     
  15. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Right, because the DASH community is going to support equipment that is still theoretical, doesn't exist yet, and hasn't even been priced yet so you could sit with 20,000% ROI for barely doing anything more than sit on more DASH than the average user holds?

    Save the mental gymnastics for the olympics, fellers. You aren't going to convince anyone but yourselves that MNO profits are ridiculously high for doing nothing.
     
  16. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    862
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Aaah, poor Checkerama. did mummy not buy you a masternode for Christmas? Life so unfair!

    But, having said that, if you wasn't so busy sulking about life's inequalities, you'd know there are many other projects with very affordable masternodes. My apologies for throwing mental gymnastics to come to that conclusion.
     
  17. JGCMiner

    JGCMiner Active Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ???

    Why did this turn into yet another “complain about MN income” thread? Objectively, that is way off-topic. I hope the mods take care of this.

    There are other places in the forums where this subject can be discussed.
     
  18. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    754
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Why are you adding them?
    10300% = how much MNOs made
    9500% = how much non-MNOs made
    10300/9500 = 8% more, just as to be expected.
     
  19. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    *facepalm* because your 1000 DASH is not spent, it is locked, so your 9500% calculation is how much you have also made off of holding your 1000 DASH. the 10300% is simply off of the 8% return per year.
     
  20. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Actually it was a "how do we not allow DASH to turn into a hyperdeflationary currency where everyone simply hoards it" discussion before someone decided they were gonna pull a fast one and try to justify their ridiculous ROIs. I can't allow that.
     
  21. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    I rather not have her buy me a masternode. You're forgiven for the mental gymnastics.
     
  22. Dandy

    Dandy Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    88
    I'm really not sure at this point if you are just trolling or you just don't understand math at all.

    Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
     
  23. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Then break down the math so you can prove my point.

    This is how you calculate ROI:

    "Everyone else" holding DASH for a year: 9500% return (supposedly)

    But what you're forgetting is that these are holders and are getting no increased value of DASH for their current holdings, so your 10300% valuation of your own profits is only accurate if you had actually paid for the DASH you're proposing to add into your initial 1000 DASH (but you don't - you have it mined and distributed to you)

    MNO's: Dollars spent on maintaining the server (at most, $100 a month)

    Monthly income: 6.9 DASH/month or 7.5k/month (currently)

    ROI = money profited/money SPENT = (90636-1200)/1200 = 74,530% ROI

    That's your actual ROI on your investment, people. Holding is not an investment.
     
    #143 Checkerama, Dec 18, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2017
  24. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    754
    Trophy Points:
    183
    The 8% is the difference *between* 9500% and 10500%. Masternodes do *not* make twice as much as non-masternode holders. I don't know how else to explain this. Suppose the price of dash went from $10 to $1000. If you bought a masternode, the value of your holdings started at $10,000 and ended at $1,080,000 (1000 dash + 80 dash from the payments). If you bought 1000 dash but did not set up a masternode, then the value of your holdings started at $10,000 and ended at $1,000,000. How is $1,080,000 twice as much as $1,000,000?
     
  25. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    You're explaining it too complex - simply put, when you did your calculations, all you did was add the 8% DASH you got into your total 1M so you could dilute the profits youre gaining as a MN, but that is NOT the case at all.

    Lets say if someone wanted to buy DASH at its current price of $1000. At $1000, off of my rudimentary estimates for your server upkeep, you could pay maintenance for 10 months. A buyer would earn 1 DASH, and you would earn how many in 10 months? 69?

    ROI is not based off of any value gained specifically on the currency, it is based on how much money you input to how much you have returned, and right now, the proportions are ridiculous. For a mere $100 a month and for simply entering when DASH was cheap (except for Dandy who for some reason mortgaged his house for the MN), you now gain ridiculous ROI in perspective of your actual expenditures. No one is gaining almost 7 DASH for a $100 contribution, no matter how you splice it. To add insult to injury, you're also sitting on 1000 DASH that is ALSO gaining the 9500% valuation that you had set for everyone else - so not only are you gaining a ridiculous amount of DASH for a dirt cheap maintenance upkeep, your initial lock is also gaining along with all the holders.

    That's how you calculate ROI.
     
  26. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    754
    Trophy Points:
    183
    You can't have it both ways, if you don't count the currency appreciation as ROI for non-masternode operators, then it shouldn't count for masternodes either. And if you do count it for Masternodes, then you need to include it for non-MNs. The fact is, for the *same* initial investment, after a year of holding, regardless of whether you denominate it in dash or in Fiat, the value of a masternode's holdings will be 8% higher than a non-masternode.
     
  27. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    That would only hold true if MNs had bought the accrued 8% additional DASH by buying them at market value, but you didn't - again, you had it distributed to you at dirt cheap prices just for being a 1000 DASH holder. If I hold 500 DASH, I don't get the additional ROI that you do UNLESS i buy more DASH at its current price. MNs don't have to do that. Does no one seriously see a problem here yet? Lol, trickle down economics on steroids.
     
  28. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    754
    Trophy Points:
    183
    No, but a lot of non-masternodes made $10,000 on each of their $100 contributions, and the ones who bought Masternodes made $10,800 on each of their $100 contributions.
     
  29. Checkerama

    Checkerama Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    68
    No, the proper math is you ALSO gained $10,000 on each your own $100 contribution just like every non-MNO, PLUS an additional $7,500 (currently) for every $100 you spent (on server maintenance, lemme know if I can make this number more accurate) thereafter on a monthly basis (with no regard to current DASH prices at any point throughout the year)
     
  30. Dandy

    Dandy Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    88
    You cannot assume that all MNOs bought Dash when it was cheap. But even if that were the case, that just mean they were smart and recognized the value of Dash early on and now they are making a profit from their forward thinking. I don't see anything wrong with that

    Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page