RC5 Launch (MANDATORY UPDATE)

[Kai]

My opinion about this 'small amount wont denominate and anonymize' is:

it is critical for Darkcoin, because new and average users will test with small amount first,
and because it wont work, DRK:s reputation and user experience is negative.

I agree, and if the value increases, anonymizing 0.05 DRK may be equivalent to anonymizing $300.

 

[TsuyokuNaritai]

I agree, and if the value increases, anonymizing 0.05 DRK may be equivalent to anonymizing $300.

 

[thelonecrouton]

In that case, I suggest we deal with this abuse like so:

After we reach 90% client/daemon wise, we keep checking the blocks, and as soon as nine out of any ten successive blocks are fully compliant, BAM! :tongue:

Evan said 90%, he didn't say how long for. :grin:

 

[moli]

Maybe moli can comment about this to DRK-90 or make new issue (better, gets more attention).

Ticket DRK-90 was lost when JIRA was updated:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-testing.2245/page-47#post-21474

Maybe Oblox has sent another ticket?

 

[oblox]

Ticket DRK-90 was lost when JIRA was updated:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-testing.2245/page-47#post-21474

Maybe Oblox has sent another ticket?

90 is back up but all the info is lost.

 

[moli]

90 is back up but all the info is lost.

Hm.. Ok. I'll try to submit a ticket from that 2 DRK scenario last night.

 

[moli]

Ticket DRK-92 submitted: http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-92

Another test case of 2 DRK was done tonight by shlermb, same negative result, was included in the ticket.

 

[philipmicklon]

Open sourcing will happen tomorrow, right?

 

[vertoe]

Open sourcing will happen tomorrow, right?

Yes.

 

[HammerHedd]

Already had a look at compiling the x64 variant too, but there are some incompatibilities with the mingw compiler used - still hoping to get that sorted out.

I have a Windows system on x64 as well and do not experience any issues - what does the console return when you enter 'getinfo' for walletversion - 60000 or 60001?

It's 60000. Is there a way to regen the wallet without losing my addresses?

 

[UdjinM6]

It's 60000. Is there a way to regen the wallet without losing my addresses?

Not sure if you can regenerate a wallet but you can use dumpprivkey/importprivkey commands to dump you key from your old wallet and import them to a new one

 

[oblox]

Not sure if you can regenerate a wallet but you can use dumpprivkey/importprivkey commands to dump you key from your old wallet and import them to a new one

Which is no different than sending coins. There isn't a way to keep your address.

 

[UdjinM6]

Which is no different than sending coins. There isn't a way to keep your address.

actually dumping/importing your private keys is the way to keep your address....

 

[oblox]

actually dumping/importing your private keys is the way to keep your address....

Hmm, I'll have to look into that as I was always under the impression that once imported, the old address is essentially dead.

 

[bertlebbert]

actually dumping/importing your private keys is the way to keep your address....

Yes, that's how I transfer addresses from one wallet to another

 

[mbilker]

Yes.

So this means we can compile the 0.12.x branch that includes the full masternode functionality?

 

[vertoe]

So this means we can compile the 0.12.x branch that includes the full masternode functionality?

Yes. It's in master branch, version tag is not updated yet but i's supposed to be 0.10.13.15...

 

[flare]

Yes. It's in master branch, version tag is not updated yet but i's supposed to be 0.10.13.15...

That's correct, release tag still missing - we'll sort that out today

 

[mbilker]

That's correct, release tag still missing - we'll sort that out today

Thank you! I would love to compile as I like to try to use the compilers for Arch Linux.

 

[crowning]

flare, jira seems to be down (my user was lost anyway), any idea about this one:

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc5-masternode-stopping-with-invalid-private-key-error.2540/