demo
Well-known member
There was no "trickery"... I explain in every single budget summary in "official announcements" when votes need to be cast before. These late votes simply do not count... that has been well explained countless times, even if a subset of the masternode owners didn't yet realized that.
Even if that weren't the case, I can assure you, the vote would not have turned out differently. I personally know of a substantial number of votes that were not cast, but were planning to vote "yes" should business development have fallen into defunded status (and no, I did not ask for them to vote, they informed me of their intent). That became unnecessary as it turned out, so they never voted.
Finally, there is a good reason why it might not be wise to allow last-minute voting. Apathetic "shadow" voters may not cast their votes if proposals they support have for example 11% support. This could allow a whale with 3% voting power to vote "no" minutes before the budget and defund something. Had the whale cast their votes days earlier, the apathetic voters have time to react. I call it "ninja voting".
This was in a sense, a case of "ninja voting" with many last-minute vote changes. Had the "shadow" voter I referenced had time to react, they surely would have cast their votes to offset it.
yeah yeah...just blame the ninja voters!!!
AND WHAT ABOUT THE NINJA BUDGET FINILIZERS????
Havent you something to say about this kind of ninjas?