What prevents someone from attending several crypto parties, thus creating several "individuals"?
Yep... and what about gate crashers?What prevents someone from attending several crypto parties, thus creating several "individuals"?
In case someone crashes the door then the cryptoparty is obiously canceled as invalid.
Fabulous!In case someone crashes the door then the cryptoparty is obiously canceled as invalid.
The solution is not masked bouncers but rather rooms where the door cannot be crashed.
A cryptoparty may elect its trusted watchers which mission will be to attend other cryptoparties at the day the next concurrent cryptoparties will take place again (normaly the concurrent cryptoparties may occur every 2 or 4 years)
They could be working for the Feds... or they could be archons (or some shit like that.)Additionaly there is no reason for a group of people to want to crash the door of a cryptoparty.
They can create their own concurrent cryptoparty in another room, so for what reason they want to crash the door?
There is nothing illegal in the proof of individuality concurrent cryptoparties, so the feds are not legalized to crash the door. However the feds can show their credentials to the attendees and then attend the party as individuals, and confirm that nothing illegal occurs during the proof of individuality procedure.They could be working for the Feds... or they could be archons (or some shit like that.)
The Feds could attend undercover upon the basis of mere suspicion of illegality alone. They would need to provide no further justification.
Perhaps the individual agent may not want to blow his (or her) individual cover, and yet still announce their affiliation with the FBI...so perhaps they could reveal that they are from the FBI, by all promising to wear the anonymous mask from "V"and to flash a picture of J.Edgar Hoover when asked for their credentials.
Surely, this would be a workable remedy to this urgent problem?
if you need the third vote to start coding, I would rather have you code the vote by number (and take the median). Which instead is really important, and I am sure someone will use sooner or later.
So have events for people put empty wallets in a box how do we prevent people from going to multiple events or going to the same event multiple times?
It is impossible for people to go to multiple events or go to the same event multiple times. Because all the events are closed door events, they happen the exact same time, and their proceedings are broadcasted in the internet with a camera. Additionally, just before the event ends and the doors open again, a web of trust among separate events is created and signed. All the attendees of all events share a common total amount of money (as basic income), so there is great incentive for the attendees of all events not to sign other events that are not appropriate.
The concurrency of events may have an exception, if we talk about events happen in separate continents (ex. Asia and America). In that case the events may happen in such a difference of time that it will be impossible for an individual to attend two events.
Are we looking for a list of dash users I see how bad actors can cause issues with this method more so the requiring 1000 dash being owned to vote.
Everyone is marked as individual (while remain anonymous). So the community knows the individuals, and can take measures against bad individual actors, in case they over do it.
For the people who attend the meeting it is definitely a proof of individuality.what you are suggesting isn't proof of individuality. At best its probable individuality.