ARE YOU NUTS????? WHO DECIDED THAT? UNDER WHAT AUTHORITY?No “No” Votes
While DAO proposals allow for a new feature – voting “No” and “Abstain” – we decided against using it for three reasons:
FUCK YOUR CONSTITUTION!!!! It is not valid anymore, simply because the people who voted for it are now inactive/dead.1.Our constitution clearly calls for an “approval-style election”.
And whats the problem with that?2.Allowing “No” votes is likely to lead to an awkward situation where the election winners all have negative votes. Imagine three candidates, A, B and C, and 100 voters. 60% prefer A, 30% prefer B, and 10% prefer C. Every voter votes Yes on their preferred candidate and No on the other two. Clearly, A should win with an absolute majority. But if “No” votes were allowed, A received 60 Yes and 2×40 = 80 No for a final tally of -20 votes. The other candidates look even worse. Winning an election with a negative vote count didn’t seem right to us.
Change the process, stupid!!!! The process is not agreeable to everyone!!!!! Vote the numbers!3.We wanted to change the tool, not the process. Previous elections have always been based on Yes votes only, just like any other major election in the world, and that process seemed agreeable to everyone.
Therefore, please do not vote “No” or “Abstain”! Your vote would be wasted. The four candidates with the most “Yes” votes will be elected.
I'll tell you the same that I've been telling my three-year-old son ever since he turned two:
"Yelling, screaming and foot-stomping won't get you anything, buddy."
Three questions, addresed to all
Trust Protectos (TP) DIF candidates.
TPDIF election system is stupid, and stupid are also all those who do not question it and trust it.