v0.10.15.x Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.

coingun

Active Member
Masternode Owner/Operator
Jul 8, 2014
489
402
133
masternode.io
So... it's now running on mainnet, right? (I know it's the testing subforum, but as these binaries replaced the mainnet's masternode security release...)
Correct we are go for launch of running 10.15.13 on mainnet. It was sort of a ninja launch so some of hte pr around it is coming still. It did hit the mailing list already and the topic of the channel on irc was updated.
 

Dr.Crypto

Member
Jul 9, 2014
46
32
58
Correct we are go for launch of running 10.15.13 on mainnet. It was sort of a ninja launch so some of hte pr around it is coming still. It did hit the mailing list already and the topic of the channel on irc was updated.
Darkcoin going ninja... I like this image :)

Anyway, thanks to all of you for answering my question! Will give a shoot with Onyx tomorrow!
 

illodin

Member
Apr 26, 2014
122
71
78
I also get stuck in state 7 if "no matching denomiations" happens. to fix it, in the check "CDarkSendPool::CheckTimeout() -- Session timed out (30s).." I had to chage the
UpdateState(POOL_STATUS_ERROR) line to
if(fMasterNode) UpdateState(POOL_STATUS_ERROR)
in order to get the timeout to kick in and put the clients back in state 3.
I'm not really sure what I'm doing, I just played around a bit till things started working!
Did this get fixed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNULinuxGuy

mbilker

Member
Aug 7, 2014
55
8
48
Are we supposed to be running 0.10.15.4-beta (rc link) or 0.10.15.13 (stable) on testnet? I am restarting my node using 0.10.15.13.
 

defunctec

Member
Jul 11, 2014
103
36
78
Are we supposed to be running 0.10.15.4-beta (rc link) or 0.10.15.13 (stable) on testnet? I am restarting my node using 0.10.15.13.
I'm in the same position.

I want to see if i can set up a masternode by myself, but only willing to give it a go on testnet.

Do i run the onyx version and just add testnet=1 in .conf file?
 

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,286
2,404
1,183
Germany
Are we supposed to be running 0.10.15.4-beta (rc link) or 0.10.15.13 (stable) on testnet? I am restarting my node using 0.10.15.13.
I'm in the same position.

I want to see if i can set up a masternode by myself, but only willing to give it a go on testnet.

Do i run the onyx version and just add testnet=1 in .conf file?
Please use 0.10.15.13 for testnet, it's the most recent version for both networks at the moment.
 

Diirk

New Member
May 27, 2014
21
31
13
All the admins are probably out to get a drink and celebrate ONYX :D
This kind of stuff annoys the living hell out of me. Same for delayed twitter updates, etc. Call me a whiner but that is unprofessional. There really needs to be a checklist of some sort when releasing updates. Don't get me wrong, I love DRK but let's get the details right.
 

TanteStefana

Grizzled Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
2,871
1,863
1,283
You have to understand, we don't have a real company here. We have developers who have their heads glued to the screen. They're not out celebrating, they probably celebrate by sleeping a few hours! Theirs is a strange job, paid in passion vs real money. I think the money is secondary to the passion and excitement of their creation.

Yah the first post doesn't get updated as it should (maybe generic info should be posted there). Bitcointalk just keeps a foot and a nod in that communities door, but it is secondary to this site, and gets behind.

Anyway, don't take comments like Light's so seriously, these guys work their butts off. These updates don't happen easily.

On another note, um... I just updated to 10.15.16, what's this about ninja launching 10.15.14? Didn't we update to that one a life time ago now? (like 2 days now?) I just started up a testnet wallet again, are we doing anything? LOL (so behind!)
 

aclass

New Member
Nov 1, 2014
3
0
1
Strange thing...
I am trying to start a MN on the testnet. I got some coins from the faucet and trying to send those to the MN address. Every time I send coins, it shows 0.0 in transactions amount, but when I check the inputs for a new transaction, it shows as the coins have been transferred.
Is this normal?
 

yidakee

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 16, 2014
1,812
1,168
283
Strange thing...
I am trying to start a MN on the testnet. I got some coins from the faucet and trying to send those to the MN address. Every time I send coins, it shows 0.0 in transactions amount, but when I check the inputs for a new transaction, it shows as the coins have been transferred.
Is this normal?
If sending to yourself within the same wallet, then yes.
 

aclass

New Member
Nov 1, 2014
3
0
1
Yes. within the same wallet... It is a bit confusing as at first I was not sure if I sent it or not until I started checking inputs
 

crowning

Well-known Member
May 29, 2014
1,414
1,997
183
Alpha Centauri Bc
Ok so, the fork didn't go well today, shouldn't we be actively testing any possible solutions Evan comes up with? Shouldn't we have a test thread for .18 or something? I just want to help. Don't you need us Evan?
That's what I think as well.

Use testnet, as much pools/miners/Masternodes/denominators as possible to get some traffic, and then switch that thing on and off and on and off and on until something somewhere forkes...
 
  • Like
Reactions: UdjinM6

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
I was playing on testnet after I read some code...
And here what I achieved:

Code:
masternode list

{
"108.61.198.220:19999" : 1,
"92.222.19.36:19999" : 1,
"198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
"92.222.10.179:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"85.214.22.190:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1
}

masternode list pubkey

{
"108.61.198.220:19999" : "n3477ZfbKrovCAZ8WgBHHk1f9YwzWgjJ3o",
"92.222.19.36:19999" : "mvJtoNZhyKTEeGU9zu4njGjNh5RpsMgpLs",
"198.50.148.87:19999" : "mwTXxpQW32AKtQUYhNKmTpgW3TmDDS8RBF",
"92.222.10.179:19999" : "mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF",
"50.254.73.146:19999" : "n4Ly2sMUYJ9sq7dmrESv9gftYb4udweubP",
"85.214.22.190:19999" : "mp1N193cngA1H4bDo2ySXwDWvvA28yjiNJ",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mguEhVkeNmPq5EqD2G1AfPKas28F5Kv1Qv",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mjUXCsVN9reytdZcJkxUQCrUj16kn1WCTh",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mmDdFP8w3vvDKM4WUpCCQ2ayKeTtKbF2yG",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mvxWmhKu61USD1WcNztBaSBBiJKYAJYyio",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mvkQ6jRhRwEKktHFGGuMShekeNxP62HPPL",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "msfczazw4GW5FwG9SMQD9kAaw2dQ9HY2xB"
}
Nice, isn't it?;)

And I'm getting paid
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/2d971ce8dca7a3b159c2f76f63fb0009c6086a9c46eda2fddf348527b9a467d2
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/mjUXCsVN9reytdZcJkxUQCrUj16kn1WCTh

But the best thing is... I DON'T EVEN RUN 81.169.177.196 , IT'S SOMEONE'S ELSE MN :cool:

EDIT: added pubkey listing to give everyone better view of what is happenning
 
  • Like
Reactions: HinnomTX

HinnomTX

Active Member
Jul 22, 2014
166
196
103
I was playing on testnet after I read some code...
And here what I achieved:

Code:
masternode list

{
"108.61.198.220:19999" : 1,
"92.222.19.36:19999" : 1,
"198.50.148.87:19999" : 1,
"92.222.10.179:19999" : 1,
"50.254.73.146:19999" : 1,
"85.214.22.190:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1,
"81.169.177.196:19999" : 1
}

masternode list pubkey

{
"108.61.198.220:19999" : "n3477ZfbKrovCAZ8WgBHHk1f9YwzWgjJ3o",
"92.222.19.36:19999" : "mvJtoNZhyKTEeGU9zu4njGjNh5RpsMgpLs",
"198.50.148.87:19999" : "mwTXxpQW32AKtQUYhNKmTpgW3TmDDS8RBF",
"92.222.10.179:19999" : "mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF",
"50.254.73.146:19999" : "n4Ly2sMUYJ9sq7dmrESv9gftYb4udweubP",
"85.214.22.190:19999" : "mp1N193cngA1H4bDo2ySXwDWvvA28yjiNJ",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mguEhVkeNmPq5EqD2G1AfPKas28F5Kv1Qv",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mjUXCsVN9reytdZcJkxUQCrUj16kn1WCTh",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mmDdFP8w3vvDKM4WUpCCQ2ayKeTtKbF2yG",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mvxWmhKu61USD1WcNztBaSBBiJKYAJYyio",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "mvkQ6jRhRwEKktHFGGuMShekeNxP62HPPL",
"81.169.177.196:19999" : "msfczazw4GW5FwG9SMQD9kAaw2dQ9HY2xB"
}
Nice, isn't it?;)

And I'm getting paid
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/2d971ce8dca7a3b159c2f76f63fb0009c6086a9c46eda2fddf348527b9a467d2
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/address/mjUXCsVN9reytdZcJkxUQCrUj16kn1WCTh

But the best thing is... I DON'T EVEN RUN 81.169.177.196 , IT'S SOMEONE'S ELSE MN :cool:

EDIT: added pubkey listing to give everyone better view of what is happenning
Very nice work! Would you file a JIRA ticket so this gets tracked and fixed?
 

Lariondos

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Apr 8, 2014
89
61
158
Thanks for using my IP :cool:
Hope this is not possible with active enforcement.
 

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
Thanks for using my IP :cool:
Hope this is not possible with active enforcement.
:D
Could be so but I'm not so sure if this "feature" has something to do with enforcement.
We can ask everyone to update tesnet MNs/pools and then enforce and test it once again OR we can wait until InstantX testing... I'm fine with whatever dev team/community will choose:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.