v0.10.15.x Testing

thelonecrouton · Oct 13, 2014

Darksend is certainly progressing much faster with this version.

eduffield · Oct 13, 2014

UdjinM6 · Oct 13, 2014

all 4 tMNs matched 00000008fa567018748da5939a55a88028f397529344eb4886b11c9e69805c26 and updated to .9

Code:

    "version" : 101509,
    "107.170.157.216:19999" : 1,
    "107.170.168.162:19999" : 1,
    "178.62.203.249:19999" : 1,
    "188.226.225.170:19999" : 1,

thelonecrouton · Oct 13, 2014

Updated MN too just for the hell of it.

crowning · Oct 13, 2014

eduffield said:
Nope. There's a few of them on the network. they're anonymous and the network functions without them, just masternode payments wouldn't be as predictable.

I don't like this kind of centralization.

As fall-back for the 'normal' payout heuristic it's kinda okay, but there should be a solution where ALL Masternodes are involved.

DrkMiner · Oct 13, 2014

eduffield,

Still problem with payment to yourself -0.001

All this time I'm trying small amounts. It happens with anon of 10 DRK or less.

Could someone please send 1000 tdrk to: mnPD2jG31ozBwxg9VhCz1noxxMdbTHdygj
Test faucet is not sending any coins. I would like to try with larger amount to see if that problem happens with larger amounts (30, 50 100).

Thanks!

oblox · Oct 13, 2014

I'm also against the idea of centralizing checkpoint nodes. Also, from that standpoint, why could someone inject their own key into the source for these checknodes and alter who gets selected?

qwizzie · Oct 13, 2014

Evan : i sent you a new email both with debug.logs and wallets because i still received 0.1 fees of self payment transactions with v9.
i'm off to bed now and will create new wallets next time so yr free to use them as you see fit.

thelonecrouton · Oct 13, 2014

DrkMiner said:
eduffield,

Still problem with payment to yourself -0.001

All this time I'm trying small amounts. It happens with anon of 10 DRK or less.

Could someone please send 1000 tdrk to: mnPD2jG31ozBwxg9VhCz1noxxMdbTHdygj
Test faucet is not sending any coins. I would like to try with larger amount to see if that problem happens with larger amounts (30, 50 100).

Thanks!

Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 5 nodes
Date: 13/10/2014 23:57
To: miner247 mnPD2jG31ozBwxg9VhCz1noxxMdbTHdygj
Debit: -1000.00 DRK
Net amount: -1000.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 6ca6544317c7fe20a8507563dccfbb50832232f5f5e145c400ae7e421fae4e9c

Might help my own current DS process.

DrkMiner · Oct 14, 2014

thelonecrouton said:
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 5 nodes
Date: 13/10/2014 23:57
To: miner247 mnPD2jG31ozBwxg9VhCz1noxxMdbTHdygj
Debit: -1000.00 DRK
Net amount: -1000.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 6ca6544317c7fe20a8507563dccfbb50832232f5f5e145c400ae7e421fae4e9c

Might help my own current DS process.

Received 1000 tdrk

What amount/rounds are you trying now? will do same amount with you
Thank You!

thelonecrouton · Oct 14, 2014

Been trying for days to get 5000 to 8 rounds... up to 2510 now...

edit: bwahaha, one tortured core just dug a mighty 16.25 tDRK!

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

Can a couple people setup a stratum server and p2pool to make sure the patches work and you can indeed get blocks? I'd do it, but I'm busy hunting down the last collateral issues.

Stratum Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin-stratum/commit/4abf08bd0d3de7fae2311f54edb8a5f86f9ab39a

P2Pool Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/p2pool-drk/commit/98a77c90d5dc460695cab71daed8d8aaab955289

moocowmoo · Oct 14, 2014

eduffield said:
Can a couple people setup a stratum server and p2pool to make sure the patches work and you can indeed get blocks? I'd do it, but I'm busy hunting down the last collateral issues.

Stratum Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin-stratum/commit/4abf08bd0d3de7fae2311f54edb8a5f86f9ab39a

P2Pool Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/p2pool-drk/commit/98a77c90d5dc460695cab71daed8d8aaab955289

you give up trying to configure ec2-54-211-25-246.compute-1.amazonaws.com ?
I've got 2Mh trying to get work from that pool endpoint.

pinestabe · Oct 14, 2014

it seems like I'm still having a problem with the IsCompatibleWithSession check. When doing IsCollateralValid, most of the time txCollateral.vout.size is less than 1 so I get "not compatible with existing transactions!" a lot.
<edit>
it looks like in CreateCollateralTransaction, the fee is set to DARKSEND_COLLATERAL, when it looks like it should be DARKSEND_FEE, since SelectCoinsCollateral can select a tx that's only DARKSEND_COLLATERAL*1 + DARKSEND_FEE, which seems to be less than what ends up needing to be DARKSEND_COLLATERAL + DARKSEND_COLLATERAL in the test later on in createcollateraltransaction to make the vout. I'm just guessing though.

gch · Oct 14, 2014

eduffield said:
Can a couple people setup a stratum server and p2pool to make sure the patches work and you can indeed get blocks? I'd do it, but I'm busy hunting down the last collateral issues.

Stratum Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin-stratum/commit/4abf08bd0d3de7fae2311f54edb8a5f86f9ab39a

P2Pool Users:
https://github.com/darkcoin/p2pool-drk/commit/98a77c90d5dc460695cab71daed8d8aaab955289

P2Pool - http://31.31.217.60:7903

I had to only change p2pool\bitcoin\p2p.py line 22 to
version=70042,

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

gch said:
P2Pool - http://31.31.217.60:7903

I had to only change p2pool\bitcoin\p2p.py line 22 to
version=70042,

Awesome, thanks

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

moocowmoo said:
you give up trying to configure ec2-54-211-25-246.compute-1.amazonaws.com ?
I've got 2Mh trying to get work from that pool endpoint.

Yeah, I haven't had time to look into it. Maybe flare can?

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

pinestabe said:
it seems like I'm still having a problem with the IsCompatibleWithSession check. When doing IsCollateralValid, most of the time txCollateral.vout.size is less than 1 so I get "not compatible with existing transactions!" a lot.
<edit>
it looks like in CreateCollateralTransaction, the fee is set to DARKSEND_COLLATERAL, when it looks like it should be DARKSEND_FEE, since SelectCoinsCollateral can select a tx that's only DARKSEND_COLLATERAL*1 + DARKSEND_FEE, which seems to be less than what ends up needing to be DARKSEND_COLLATERAL + DARKSEND_COLLATERAL in the test later on in createcollateraltransaction to make the vout. I'm just guessing though.

Interesting to have others looking at the code

Here's the gist of how those inputs work. They're made as (DARKSEND_COLLATERAL*5)+DARKSEND_FEE. Afterwards, say you get charged a collateral fee (which is DARKSEND_COLLATERAL not DARKSEND_FEE, one is way more expensive than the other on purpose), it'll be (DARKSEND_COLLATERAL*4)+DARKSEND_FEE. You could get charged a collateral fee upwards of five times, each time vout will get paid back the rest of that input. The very last time is (DARKSEND_COLLATERAL*0)+DARKSEND_FEE, i.e, that's not enough to pay a collateral anymore -- so it just turns into a regular darksend session fee.

I just changed this yesterday, maybe your client has the old style of fees? I would try to update and move funds to a brand new wallet.

qwizzie · Oct 14, 2014

can someone pls sent me some tdrk .. 5000 if possible.. thanks
n3yqWFEWaMQMkZA1XvqPpmjkafa5MJBAWs

https://drkipn.com/test/faucet/ doesnt seem to be working at the moment.

moli · Oct 14, 2014

qwizzie said:
can someone pls sent me some tdrk .. 5000 if possible.. thanks
n3yqWFEWaMQMkZA1XvqPpmjkafa5MJBAWs

https://drkipn.com/test/faucet/ doesnt seem to be working at the moment.

The faucet has a huge delay. I requested for 1000 tdrk about 13 hours ago and just now they arrived in my wallet. I've talked with teamer, the owner of the faucet and he said it's updated, just not sure what the problem is.

Edit: I just tried this faucet: http://test.faucet.masternode.io/ and it works. Got 1000 tdrk from there just now

qwizzie · Oct 14, 2014

moli said:
The faucet has a huge delay. I requested for 1000 tdrk about 13 hours ago and just now they arrived in my wallet. I've talked with teamer, the owner of the faucet and he said it's updated, just not sure what the problem is.

Edit: I just tried this faucet: http://test.faucet.masternode.io/ and it works. Got 1000 tdrk from there just now

okay.. will try that link .. thanks

qwizzie · Oct 14, 2014

Evan : i sent you an email with debug.log .. only 1 of my 5 wallets came across 0.1 fees.. the other 4 wallets seem to be running fine (need more time monitoring them)

stonehedge · Oct 14, 2014

I have mined 11.5k tDrk in the last few days. How shall I spread the love?

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

I've confirmed these payments are completely equal based on the active time per masternode.

Payments Address
10 mkFnwmgWU5MEVybrphXF4oBpZZ5nTyZAEL
10 mpV2d8vgC7LQNNzXzS3E84TMdykQQvHvkX
10 mvxbSnZWL2jk3xxpPbLosXhSQ5jUKTUz14
10 mwBSmtHcH8jvUK6gr7F1w43HYttAGe9BFY
10 mwTXxpQW32AKtQUYhNKmTpgW3TmDDS8RBF
10 my9VPHXbbYiV84CXYfj1FzmNoMrmjv1duv
10 n4Ly2sMUYJ9sq7dmrESv9gftYb4udweubP
11 miq9MsJvrdypV1ovpGSYvShBpMX7A5FaqU
11 mkkc3ac6PFKax1AzK7SeqHJUMUhwnHT5sj
11 moTGqJBcDTtUpr2a7fSRYLUVNnMtcCME6Z
11 moufT7XNgdCjWnYyJUyuLZjK64zkfatfwM
11 mvK4V9LsPZvjgCaEPGq5d9b8xfKf3LiETt
11 mybEwGJB98ZHEJkNs5Xa2Pps4DxUNMT2Yf
11 myKtKKwAnQWXR78QndMu5sjGoovPbu4jkC
11 n3477ZfbKrovCAZ8WgBHHk1f9YwzWgjJ3o
11 n43UCKkMybVQ7bFBfyZ2wJciHTetheyuc1
12 mhDE2DkKDK1Q3TVv3Gdg3GKMzNH7bxzF7M
12 mpCjmn7rKUs6TcXeXxTKoBK1wtkC1Qsune
12 mtohxUb85JwGutcg7y3UoAXhEDKQYkPop9
12 my55Qww9sToastiaQPrs5cvwm2M8MbDEuf
13 mpYsqsaz4Dcq3PSXSAS6QAVB6rPMMEcGY6
2 n15eS391XV1KMooJSX6GcWAwMDP43ojXtL
3 mxb92XRQH95udALrjmU3EuToPqRs2Kfs7D
5 mtfFVhkB4dsn7xRNxzWjJGEEHPSeQhon8X
5 myZ9uTjQeEH1N3Mf4iAtw8pRV2DFUYHzeu
5 n31XM9Bucj1HHCiXzC5YtLKnqfKcwWgJ7n
8 mjhQ5PXZ6TftozhvMffmZczQU5cTAJbo35
8 mtBF5aK8sUP8NADWmnq7gC775TePFx42ro
8 mzyWRFPLH8q5F1B8isJ7E2uSJGhJSuDRKY
9 mg7j7YAhqUbLrN1btxZcnhW18ydCk7wACh
9 moQgMKbaQAZKCCwAqCZvHt6ijouXCNGpYy
9 mpMVevHGJCuBpqxFqbah1dgkSDnyi58nTb
9 mrtY9qopFHzyqcXju13xFSE2Py6gVUWL6S
9 msYvxx52hVZjwDrgi1AHgmNUpxrTg1ctxT
9 mvcEegL5wRP5kQ4A445zRhJjCjbZz9C2vF

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

qwizzie said:
Evan : i sent you an email with debug.log .. only 1 of my 5 wallets came across 0.1 fees.. the other 4 wallets seem to be running fine (need more time monitoring them)

Yes, thanks. I'm looking through it now.

kryptofoo · Oct 14, 2014

If i am seeing these in the debug.log and darksend is not progressing, what can i do?

2014-10-14 16:46:25 Darksend request incomplete: collateral not valid. Will retry...

I am using the wallet from 10.13.13 - is that a factor?

eduffield · Oct 14, 2014

kryptofoo said:
If i am seeing these in the debug.log and darksend is not progressing, what can i do?

2014-10-14 16:46:25 Darksend request incomplete: collateral not valid. Will retry...

I am using the wallet from 10.13.13 - is that a factor?

Send all of the money to a new wallet, and start over again. Also, you need 10.15.10

coingun · Oct 14, 2014

Weird after updating p2pool it's now stuck just like the other mainnet p2pool. I really wish I could figure otu what is causing p2pool to just crash like this and get stuck at this stage...

2014-10-14 17:04:02.668429 Testing bitcoind P2P connection to '127.0.0.1:19999'...
2014-10-14 17:04:07.668725 ...taking a while. Common reasons for this include all of bitcoind's connection slots being used...

This is my second server it's happened to and I know others have reported this as well. A fresh git clone doesn't help. So confused.

kryptofoo · Oct 14, 2014

eduffield said:
Send all of the money to a new wallet, and start over again. Also, you need 10.15.10

already running 10.15.10 - just created new wallet transferred funds darksend is working again. I guess new wallet is pretty much a prerequisite to using new darksend release.

Edit: thank you sir!

v0.10.15.x Testing

Well-known Member

Core Developer

Official Dash Dev

Well-known Member

Well-known Member

Member

Well-known Member

Well-known Member

Well-known Member

Member

Well-known Member

Core Developer

Bovine Bit-flipper

New Member

New Member

Core Developer

Core Developer

Core Developer

Core Developer

Well-known Member

Grizzled Member

Well-known Member

Well-known Member

Well-known Member

Core Developer

Core Developer

Member

Core Developer

Active Member

Member