Am I the only one for whom the faucet is not sending funds to? 
Edit: Sorry, I forgot the "-testnet" argument.
Edit: Sorry, I forgot the "-testnet" argument.
Gotcha! Maybe teamer should add a "testnet address validity check" to the field when he is out of the hospital againAm I the only one for whom the faucet is not sending funds to?
Edit: Sorry, I forgot the "-testnet" argument.
Thanks for reporting, already noted in JIRAThe completion bar stays at 100% even though new funds are being anonymized.
Edit: The bar jumped now to 57% as new funds are being anonymized. I think its just a GUI bug that the completion bar doesn't get set to 0% after job is finished.
Edit2: I just had an error that said "Not compatible with existing transactions".
I have seen similar behavior, progress bar jumping back and forth during anonymizing.The completion bar stays at 100% even though new funds are being anonymized.
I will edit this post when new funds are anonymized(and if they are anonymized). So far RC5 looks really good. I think this is the RC that will make the price jump sky high. I just hope it won't be moved to mainnet until all bugs are sorted out.
Good job Darkcoin team.
Edit: The bar jumped now to 57% as new funds are being anonymized. I think its just a GUI bug that the completion bar doesn't get set to 0% after job is finished.
Edit2: I just had an error that said "Not compatible with existing transactions".
I think it's because each round of DS+ doesn't necessarily involve all your DRK (or the DRK you've asked to be anonymised) but instead just whatever is compatable with the pools currently available, which makes it tricky to give precise figures for the total cost per x DRK.I have seen similar behavior, progress bar jumping back and forth during anonymizing.
Anonymizing has completed now. Just one question.
It's probably just me, not fully understanding the progres...
I've set darksend rounds to 8 and 1000 drk's to keep anonymized (2000 in my wallet)
Now after denominating is done, i've checked and i've paid 0.26 tDRK total for denominating (so 21 times). I figured it would cost me just 8 times 0.0125 since i've put 8 rounds.
Is this normal behavior? And if so, is there a way to predict what the cost is going to be before starting the denominating?
Oh ok, i get it.I think it's because each round of DS+ doesn't necessarily involve all your DRK (or the DRK you've asked to be anonymised) but instead just whatever is compatable with the pools currently available, which makes it tricky to give precise figures for the total cost per x DRK.
I suppose a further user-selectable option could be added, anonymise cheaply (takes longer) or faster (costs more) but it still wouldn't give you any guarantees so might not be worth it?
Isn't this address from main net? I thought all testnet addresses started wtih an N or an M?XvSbhw1NaATBCmdyxYWRw57Tvf7xvbRVdP
Can someone send me some tDRK? Thanks.
Sent: b4418a9294ecd023dfdf04f0165aecdd474253b6f7af3000c738e7aa94ba312aTest coins plz!
mpHPUZwHsGzHCPbHZ6omzN8pGW2xk1CpY6
Updated to latest windows version.
Yep, and as far as i know he figured out himself :-DIsn't this address from main net? I thought all testnet addresses started wtih an N or an M?
Hell yeah! I won't be the one complaining1000DRK through 8 rounds of DS+ costing 0.00026% is still a bloody good deal... but yes I think an anon-budget might be a good idea in future.
Just an update on this, I opened up the wallet again today and the process started again on its own, very cool. I guess I was just impatient yesterday.Maybe I was just impatient, had to leave the house. I am on my cell now will check later. Anyway, the first time it was pretty much instantaneous when I had no anon funds, second time I wasnt sure what to expect as to when the process should/would start again. It just kept showing 100%, like I said maybe I left too soon. But something like new non anon funds detected... denom should start shortly would be great.
This looks normal splitting to me.This is the first time i have ever seen a denomination like these...
Does this need reporting?
I'm curious if the development team has automated testing in place to catch these splitting/mixing bugs. Ideally it should be tested on some kind of testnet or simulated testnet with many different sized inputs and fast confirmation times before the code is pushed out.I'm participating in this testing as an end user as well, using the windows wallet which imo will be used by mainstream users. Anyways, after being WOWed by the speedy anonymizing of the first 1000 drk... I spent 300 drk, and received 701.99 drk. I left the Options settings the same (1000 drk to be anonymized at 8 rounds), but nothing happened overnight.
This morning I changed the amount to 800, waited, the anonymization progress bar stayed the same at 86%. Restarted the wallet, waited, the progress bar was still the same. Changed the amount to 1000, waited, it didn't make the anonymizing to budge. There have been talks about we can make it even more anonymous by going through 8 rounds a few times. Can this happen yet? How?
I understand that the anonymizing has to wait for compatible pairs, but I'm wondering if this is a bug. The first initial 1000 drk were anonymized fast, but it seems the next process is halted or something.
View attachment 410
It's not a bug, it's a .. storyEvan or Flare, could you please explain this with examples:
http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-40
Thank you.
I am working on this - unfortunately Darkcoin does not have the 'regnet' mode (additional to testnet) as in Bitcoin 0.9.x yet, but thats the way we want to go in the future. Evan has his own "mini testnet" in place for development, but the CI-server is still lacking suchI'm curious if the development team has automated testing in place to catch these splitting/mixing bugs. Ideally it should be tested on some kind of testnet or simulated testnet with many different sized inputs and fast confirmation times before the code is pushed out.
The client has no way of knowing that those DRK have just been mined, it assumes all incoming DRK requires anonymising, which for just about every other case is true.Not sure if this has been discussed...
I am mining solo against the window-qt..
I recieved 2000 tdrk
my setting is, 8 rounds 5000
I now have over 4400 anonimized because it is denominating my mined blocks.... aren't mined blocks already anonymous? I dont think I should have to pay fees on my mined coins?
Jim
Interesting idea, per definition fresh mined blocks should be anonymous as they are not tainted at all. Perhaps you should file this as feature request.aren't mined blocks already anonymous? I dont think I should have to pay fees on my mined coins?
How many MNs are we talking, and how much DRK do you need to accomplish that? I might could make a small donation, and there are likely others who would contribute to a robust testnet!I'm willing to provide a large quantity of test masternodes in return for DRK to cover the hosting costs. Would more masternodes in testnet help?
Willing to contribute, depends what numbers we are talking about.I'm willing to provide a large quantity of test masternodes in return for DRK to cover the hosting costs. Would more masternodes in testnet help?
I have some resource but am very rusty in linux, if someone can help me with the setup of the MN i can host MN continuously on test net.I'm willing to provide a large quantity of test masternodes in return for DRK to cover the hosting costs. Would more masternodes in testnet help?