If the PoSe scoring solution for Platform is unrelated to this discussion, then so is the mentioning of Sam that Platform being successfully started would not be a given for anything but the 4K HPM or the 10K HPM solution. You can't really discuss one, without mentioning the other.Re Qwizzie : This decision on the number of nodes is, as stated by QE, among other reasons a drive toward a cheaper of usage Platform that has capacity for a higher transaction per second. I have seen stated that this is related to Platform having no Proof of Service. This is as you can see, unrelated. PoSe solves different issues. On that topic, it would take a fair amount of time before being able to implement a proper PoSe and would delay Platform further.
It will be solely a discussion about ROI, Platform Storage Fees and Transaction Per Second, versus sacrifing decentralisation to achieve this (while denying masternode owners with less then 4000 dash the choice / opportunity to receive Platform rewards) and speculating that super low storage fees and higher TPS will somehow translate to a higher adoption rate.
Okay, lets talk about numbers first here : do the ROI numbers that was calculated / estimated for Platform on all nodes, 4K HPM system and 10K HPM system include the miner-masternode re-allocation change that is running till June 2025 ?
See :
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/...gh-performance-nodes.53374/page-7#post-232371
www.dash.org/forum/threads/updated-mn-miner-reallocation-schedule.51453/
Looks like there is one more change coming up this year in Dash mn-miner reallocation schedule (Nov 2022).
Last edited: