This is another discrepancy I have with your vision, GG.@DCruz -- Assuming the same number of masternodes, the ROI per MN decreases at 7% annually. At the same time, increase in MN number lowers the ROI. The anticipated growth in DASH/USD would offset this decrease.
Anticipation/anticipate is pretty darned close to assumption/assume.
... I need not do the breakdown on that one, right ?
Is there documentation of many, many people clamoring for their locale to be properly served by DASH ?
The question I might have, would be, at what capacity is the present node system functioning ?
Is there a need, at this present time, to increase carrying capacity of the network ?
Or, would new additions to the MN tier be geographically placed in under-served physical locations along with a public awareness campaign to generate usage for the benefit of the populace in that portion of the globe ?
Tnx GG !
rc