Hi,
I've read a bit about reducing the proposal fee (PF) to 1 Dash.
I think, that is is an arbitrary value, so I've thought about alternatives. Here the result:
- 1 Dash: arbitrary value
- 5 Dash: arbitrary value
- indexed to US-Dollar: complicated and the value of the Dollar changes too
- indexed to hashrate (so more or less to price of electricity): easy, but still an arbitrary value
My proposal: let the MNOs determine it directly.
- at any time, an MNO can adjust his value for the PF (just as his IP-address)
- once per month, the PF is calculated as the average of all submitted values
- if there is no value (no MNO submits any value), there would be a fallback value, e.g. 1 Dash (this should never happen)
Advantages:
- at any time, the value would be adjusted to the real needs
- those, who are concerned about the value (the MNOs), decide about it
I can not develop it. It would be great, if a coder would show up here with his estimate of costs.
TIA for any coder, who would like to do that!
Peter
I've read a bit about reducing the proposal fee (PF) to 1 Dash.
I think, that is is an arbitrary value, so I've thought about alternatives. Here the result:
- 1 Dash: arbitrary value
- 5 Dash: arbitrary value
- indexed to US-Dollar: complicated and the value of the Dollar changes too
- indexed to hashrate (so more or less to price of electricity): easy, but still an arbitrary value
My proposal: let the MNOs determine it directly.
- at any time, an MNO can adjust his value for the PF (just as his IP-address)
- once per month, the PF is calculated as the average of all submitted values
- if there is no value (no MNO submits any value), there would be a fallback value, e.g. 1 Dash (this should never happen)
Advantages:
- at any time, the value would be adjusted to the real needs
- those, who are concerned about the value (the MNOs), decide about it
I can not develop it. It would be great, if a coder would show up here with his estimate of costs.
TIA for any coder, who would like to do that!
Peter
Last edited: