Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

Pre-Proposal for Time Based Proposal Fee Rebates

Discussion in 'Pre + Budget Proposal Discussions' started by GrandMasterDash, Apr 21, 2017.

?

Would you accept this proposal?

  1. Yes

    1 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. No

    4 vote(s)
    80.0%
  1. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    If at first you don't succeed, give up...

    Initial Ramble

    As many of you know, there has been much discussion regarding the current 5 dash proposal fee. In fact, at this time of writing, there is an active proposal to reduce the proposal fee to 1 dash (approximately US$75). This debate has clearly divided opinion.

    The original 5 dash proposal fee was introduced as a mechanism to reduce spam. To date, this has worked relatively successfully. However, the current US dollar price of dash is leading some people to question if the high fee is stifling progress.

    Clearly, none of us can be sure what impact a change in proposal fee will bring. However, if the 1 dash proposal passes, I am willing to at least give it a try If it becomes clear the 1 dash proposal is not working, I would consider making the following proposal ASAP.

    Solution - Proposals That Pay

    The proposal fee is fixed to 4 dash and held at a time locked address (end of budget). When the Superblock arrives, a rebate is issued to successful proposals on a sliding scale (preference given to early submissions):

    Day 01, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 30 ---> 3 dash rebate (maximum)
    Day 02, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 29
    Day 03, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 28
    Day 04, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 27
    Day 05, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 26
    ..and so on..
    Day 30, Proposal Rebate = 0.1 dash x 1 ---> 0.1 dash rebate (minimum)

    Crucially, all failed submissions receive zero rebates and the total of all failed proposal fees is shared equally among all successful proposals, regardless of their value.

    This rebate feature therefore encourages early submissions, giving MNOs more time to digest them. Secondly, it's theoretically possible that projects are over funded (bonus), paid for by failed proposals.
     
    #1 GrandMasterDash, Apr 21, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2017
    • Useful Useful x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  2. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    I will vote yes if all your inital numbers are expressed as variables (in order to be able to be voted in the future)

    Default values X=4, Y=0.1, Day_end_of_budget=30, Z =0, step=1

    and additionaly if you add something like this:
     
    #2 demo, Apr 21, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2017
  3. lynx

    lynx Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you trying to achieve here? Because it doesn't seem that the solution matches the problem. The "problem" as I understand it is that it is too risky to pay 5 Dash because there is a chance the proposal might fail for various reasons. Your solution doesn't address this. We are back to your last attempt, with an insignificant twist (which is difficult to implement and adds unnecessary complexity to proposals).
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Invariably there will be failed proposals, whether they are spam or if pre-proposals are poorly engaged. This solution incentivizes successful proposals i.e. they could actually make money provided MNOs actually like what they see. Also, as stated earlier, it would encourage early submissions, which many MNOs might actually appreciate.
     
  5. lynx

    lynx Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You want to turn proposals into gambling, which is rather uncanny. It is not the lack of a random chance to win a couple of bucks that is stopping people from submitting proposals.

    I also don't think incentivising proposals to be made a full month before the deadline is worth the coding time.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Trolling Trolling x 1
  6. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    You should not count in coding time. You should count in coding price.
    A lot of open source developers are coding cheap, or even for free.
    If you find a developer excited with your idea, he may implement it half the price or free.
     
  7. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    It's not gambling. Good proposals pass, bad proposals fail, this solution doesn't change that at all. Submissions have a fixed price and spamming doesn't negatively impact good proposals, that too hasn't changed. So when you introduce the term "gambling", I'm inclined to mark that comment as "trolling".

    You don't see any advantage in early submissions, nor any disadvantage when a major proposal is introduced late in the cycle. How about that debit card proposal.. when was it meant to be delivered? - oh yeah I know, mid-April.

    Someone said this was turning into the "Great Bitcoin Scaling Debate" and I'm starting to think they might be right; one half recognises a problem (only 494 dash allocated this month), while others bury their head in the sand and claim no problem. Well I just hope the 1 Dash Proposal (1DP) passes and holds so that we can once and for all put this to bed. These are the reasons why decred and pivx exist, because when everyone has a say, there isn't a single segment to point to and blame for their incompetence to deal with something.
     
  8. lynx

    lynx Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You just made 3 consecutive pre-proposals because another proposal doesn't seem to go the way you wanted. I gave you my honest feedback, if you don't value it, fine, I won't waste my time. I'll be back if and when it's a real proposal for the sake of discussing with the other MNOs.

    Did you ever consider that some might see a problem but disagree with your solution?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Those 3 consecutive pre-proposals are 3 more than yours. Clearly I accept there were problems with those, and so I'm here in the hope that, at the very least, if it's not me with a solution, that it might spark ideas, someone else tweaks it a little and helps to find a solution / compromise. In contrast, from you, all I saw was "do nothing" and introducing the word "gambling" when it's nothing of the sort.

    But yeah, if you want to talk about gambling, let's talk about PoW and how solutions are randomly searched until a correct one is found.. wait, let me guess, you wouldn't dare call mining a lottery / "gambling".
     
  10. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    163
    I like the idea of fee rebates, but time based might be going overboard, and I disagree with "failed proposals get 0 rebate"

    I think *some* failed proposals (budgets that do not get funded) should be refunded, and *all* successful proposals should be refunded.

    For example, possibly refund between 0-5 dash depending on how far between 0% and 10% the vote is. Anything below 0% gets no refund. Or simpler, just refund all 5 dash to anything that exceeds a certain vote threshold which is lower than the threshold required to pass.

    The idea is that we need to continue the disincentive for bad/spam proposals, but lessen the disincentive to propose things which are likely to have a chance.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Yes, but the fixed price is there to discourage spam before it gets published. But you know, I'm thinking maybe people are worrying too much about spam proposals because so far we've seen very few, even when dash was 10x smaller. Maybe we should just sign a monthly vote and let a spork set the average price.
     
  12. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    163
    It would still discourage spam before getting published. Bad proposals which fail miserably would still get no refund.

    I think if you manage to get a net positive vote from the masternodes, the system shouldn't punish you to the same extent that it does when the proposal actually has negative support.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    I have made a fork from your proposal.
    Could you please add my fork as poll option, in order for me (and for any other who agree with my fork) to be able to vote in your poll?
     
  14. GrandMasterDash

    GrandMasterDash Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    153
    An open source forked poll should create it's own thread.

    Wait, did you just invent the forked poll?? :p
     
  15. IronVape

    IronVape Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    58
    How about:
    Net positive YES - NO =full refund
    Net positive YES + Abstain - NO = half refund.
     
  16. Biltong

    Biltong Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Just a reminder - the original problem was that a lot of people can't afford to put up the 5 (or 4) Dash needed. They are just too poor.
     
  17. demo

    demo Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Dash Address:
    XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
    Forked poll? It is not a forked poll, your initial question remains the same. You may call it a forked poll option. I want my fork proposal to be put near your initial proposal as a poll option, for the people to be able to compare it with yours and vote accordingly.

    However you call this system, it is acctualy a similar method to this alternative budget system.

    Note that currently I am not allowed to add a new poll option in your poll here, but you are (as the creator of the poll). So the current system of this forum may be called a "forked poll option upon permission".
     
    #17 demo, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:17 AM
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2017 at 6:34 AM
  18. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Not a forked poll but the poll is forked.
     

Share This Page