We are presently undergoing a legal restructuring to provide a number of benefits to the network. It will likely take at least two months to complete this process.
This must be before I joined. Can you find/pm me a link to that thread? Would like to see what happened. I thought the PEC should be open about who earns what, but if it leads to **** - then maybe not.".., as this would opens up individuals to trolling/ badmounthing and what not
(we have seen it in Dash before and there is no point in going back to it)....
ryan fernando and such (i do not have the details on me tbh)Hi Tungfa
Thanx: ".. shared from multisig accounts" Great - that is what I needed to know. Last question: how many sigs? I assume 3? Ryan and who else? And how is the decision made on who holds the other 2? The PEC might well end up needing a similar system. Once there are 4 or more PEC members the possibility of corruption will creep in and I would like to avoid that - even just the perception that it's possible.
It would be a good idea for the Dash core group to make a policy right now that all salaries will be openly published. So everything you get paid goes into a public spreadsheet.
This is how it's done in almost all government agencies in the US and in many state universities in the US. If this is the official policy, then nobody is taken by surprise, and nobody gets embarrassed.
If the Dash core developers keep salaries confidential (as I think they currently do -- please point me to a published list with actual numbers if I'm mistaken), it will very hard to make them public later. People will have an expectation of privacy that will be hard to change.
It's a question of managing expectations. If your salary was public when you first got paid, you're already used to that, and you won't complain.
If it was kept private originally, you might object to it becoming public later.
Thanx David
Difficult one:
1) decentralized - everything open?
2) Decentralized some things hidden?
1 too idealistic? 2 open to centralization and/or corruption
Issue is controversial and potentially disruptive
My gut feel is leave well alone, but be very careful and as open as possible - do not become more secretive!
Spend time thinking on how to open up more - safely.
For what it's worth I agree that detailed disclosure isn't necessary. If you hire a construction company to build you an extension, you don't need to know how much the gaffer gets or how much the junior labourer gets, you only need to know the total you're paying to get the job done.