Dump Darksend!

InTheWoods

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Oct 12, 2014
721
941
263
BolehVPN

It certainly would have been a catchy name. :) The downside I see is it not being a mainstream word most people would understand unlike PrivacyProtect which has the word privacy in it.
 

lynx

Active Member
Dec 11, 2015
364
250
133
InTheWoods
Privacy is already a concept governments fight against. "Fungify it" would haven been even better for staying under the radar (unless those mushrooms gave them the wrong idea :) ).
 

Macrochip

Active Member
Feb 1, 2015
226
199
103
Ok, enough with the silly I hope...

"PrivacyProtect" is a terrible rebrand for DarkSend. Nothing in that term implies anything about privately sending money. While I never had any objections against DarkSend myself, I can see why people bitch and moan about it.

Some user on BCTalk mentioned a great name. Let's streamline the product branding.

We got "InstantX" let's use "PrivatX" as well. It's self-explanatory and fits right into the branding scheme. "Problem" solved.
 

Dash for Cash

New Member
Jan 27, 2016
10
25
13
61
Whangarei, New Zealand
Ok, enough with the silly I hope...

"PrivacyProtect" is a terrible rebrand for DarkSend. Nothing in that term implies anything about privately sending money. While I never had any objections against DarkSend myself, I can see why people bitch and moan about it.

Some user on BCTalk mentioned a great name. Let's streamline the product branding.

We got "InstantX" let's use "PrivatX" as well. It's self-explanatory and fits right into the branding scheme. "Problem" solved.
No complaints here. I like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDashGuy

BolehVPN

Active Member
Nov 24, 2014
195
306
123
Ok, enough with the silly I hope...

"PrivacyProtect" is a terrible rebrand for DarkSend. Nothing in that term implies anything about privately sending money. While I never had any objections against DarkSend myself, I can see why people bitch and moan about it.

Some user on BCTalk mentioned a great name. Let's streamline the product branding.

We got "InstantX" let's use "PrivatX" as well. It's self-explanatory and fits right into the branding scheme. "Problem" solved.
I don't mind PrivateX provided that it's instant too.
 

InTheWoods

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Oct 12, 2014
721
941
263
Ok, enough with the silly I hope...

"PrivacyProtect" is a terrible rebrand for DarkSend. Nothing in that term implies anything about privately sending money. While I never had any objections against DarkSend myself, I can see why people bitch and moan about it.

Some user on BCTalk mentioned a great name. Let's streamline the product branding.

We got "InstantX" let's use "PrivatX" as well. It's self-explanatory and fits right into the branding scheme. "Problem" solved.
PrivacyProtect makes more sense as a built-in feature. Ideally we'd want anonymity to be activated by default for all transactions and have the manual mixing part removed.