[dashninja.pl] Dash Masternode Ninja - Free Masternode Monitoring

http://www.datatables.net/examples/api/regex.html

html

Code:

Regexp search: <input type="text" class="global_filter" id="global_filter">

js

Code:

$('input.global_filter').on( 'keyup click', function () {
$('#mnlist').DataTable().search($('#global_filter').val(), true, true).draw();
} );

and maybe some css for global_filter

Pleeeeeease

 

I LOVE IT!!!!111

 

Awesome! Now I can watch my MNs drop off the network for no reason with a lot less hassle!

 

Lol!

 

Feature request: show all requested addresses even if they do not appear in the mn list, with some kind of color-code flag so we can go figure out why the little bastards disppeared... Maybe pink or purple for being so ghey... When you've got a big fat stack of masternodes, and 4 drop off the network entirely for no reason, it's hard to screen for the missing ones.

 

I wish I had problems like that...

 

I've got 4 that I absolutely cannot get to show up in masternode list. They worked fine initially, changed nothing, refuse to show up. It would be nice if they weren't just ignored by regexp, but were still shown, as unlisted, in purple...

OT, but found reason; local client start-many is falsely claiming:

This statement is false. All addresses were and still are locked. They all have exactly the same 1000 DRK they started with. Nothing changed. start-many is failing to recognize that which it previously had no problem recognizing.

Restart local client.

masternode start-many over and over again, it pick up a missing node randomly on one pass or another. After re-running it about 30 times (giving time for propagation, checking masternode list from the nodes themselves), all are back in the list.

Sumthin's goofy...

 

I'm using elberethzone's fantastic API to display at-a-glance masternode balance information at http://drk.monitor.mn/

You can monitor multiple masternodes by adding the full ipaddress(s) into the big Filter By input box.

I'll be adding more features this week, and I'm open to suggestions from the community.

If you find the site useful, please consider tipping elberethzone. I have a link to his DRK address at the bottom of my site.

 

elbereth Not sure if you noticed but https://drk.mn/blocks.html#blocksdetail shows "Unpaid" for blocks that were actually paid.

 

Those payees aren't on the MN list. I emailed Evan about this last night.

Edit: Block 175829 paid to this address:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9.htm
and it doesn't have a balance, though it looks like it's the first vin and the 1k DRK was moved. I don't understand it.
And I did show this to elbereth and discuss with him, he asked me to email evan.

 

UdjinM6, last night (US time zone) this was on drk.mn:



Block 175692 paid to address: XmaySiFee7LKzsVNDmPJSD1YgYgFuuD5ks, but this address wasn't on the MN list.

I sent email to Evan, and he explained that, "I looked at the reference node and I don't have it either. The only reason for this would be that specific node went offline right after the payment happened. So it shouldn't get paid again."

(Sorry I posted this a few min ago and had to repost because the image didn't show up and I couldn't edit it, had to delete that post.)

 

elbereth, remember we discussed this address (Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9) that does not have a balance, yet got MN payment. I just checked my email, Evan replied a few days ago, said:

 

That is correct.

 

I guess so. It looks like his second address is XhWdVGfSZoGYcBAv6dCUqJ9wpFkWdbBjBS

I'm looking at: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XhWdVGfSZoGYcBAv6dCUqJ9wpFkWdbBjBS.htm

This MN has been up since Nov. 2 (?) and no MN payment has gone to it. So I guess his MN payment went to the first address which has 0 balance. Confusing to me but that's how it is, I guess.

 

No problem. I was curious to find out too...

 

Guess we have same problem but now with 35% MN payment blocks



MN was payed btw http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/000000000000a3caa932924bc24573f1c82be595f12c43283aa0f01df50aed6a

 

Recently your site was showing 1740 mn, now it shows 1667 mn, wondering what made it change? (fyi other sites displayed 1660's while yours was displaying 1740. Does it have to do with MN running previous versions that the site doesn't check for?

Also noticing that some people are running v 10.17.25, like .3% of all MN, not a large amount by any measure but I'm wondering if anyone can elaborate on that?

 

Feature request: Additional stats by protocol version (70052, 70053, ...) - currently there is only a chart with "clientversion", which is not accurate being "only latest protocol"