Literally the only reason cryptocurrency must be opensource lies in the fact that it must be trustless, otherwise people would install binaries that just end up sending their coins to the programmer. This project however does not handle any funds. It's just a governance tool that'll help us become more efficient with our decision making and proposal vetting. There is no reason to opensource it for everyone. The code can be distributed to trusted parties for safekeeping. You can achieve redundancy without exposing all your secrets.
My thoughts exactly. You don't have to have fully open source code to insure long term viability. If he wants to make it open source, I wouldn't object to that, since I still feel pretty generous to the rest of the crypto universe. I don't see them as real competitors. Fiat and banksters, those are our competitors.There is no reason to opensource it for everyone. The code can be distributed to trusted parties for safekeeping. You can achieve redundancy without exposing all your secrets.
Frankly, to be a strong DAO we will need many groups doing the same thing. This type of project brings with it a lot of power. We eventually need multiples of every type of service such as this. So please do keep working on your idea. The hardest thing is to find people who are willing to step up to the plate and make something that we NEED
I got over excited, I helped paragon through the process of submitting the proposal and then posted here afterwards.Why didn't paragon post the link here himself?
How can we be sure it's indeed his proposal?
Has it even happened that someone else stole a pre-proposal and posted it as their own proposal?
No No.Hi dude,
Are you born to be slave that is why you don't have Masternode... Do you think those holding Masternode started today. It about being focused and determined.
- What about tags? Who will be responsible to add tags to a proposal? Can the proposal owner define his own tags? I have made a pre-proposal for tags, which may be relevant.
- You also said that you are going to give to trustworthy people the ability to edit/rate in your database. Who are those trustworthy? How do you define "trustworthy" word? I dont trust the same people you trust. I want you to let me define in your database who I trust. And then let me see your database filtered in such a way so that only the ratings and the comments of the people I trust will be visible to me. Is this possible? Are you planning to implement something like this?
give to trustworthy people the ability to edit/rate in the database.