An equilibrium at 2 PH/s, the equivalent of less than 135,000 D3's.
Talk about centralized. The equilibrium proves that DASH will never be a viable option as a decentralized currency, along with the ridiculous masternode system, which was the entire point of this discussion.
Imagine my shock...
As predicted, hashrate soft caps (in terms of profit) at ~2.2 PH/s. Just fluctuating between 1.8-2 now (although there seems to be recent development in the hashrate the last few hours).
I'm figuring miners know the percentage gain of a DASH coin would be a bigger gain than that of a Bitcoin...
There's a benefit-to-cost ratio associated with mining anything in general.
When it is said that it is "unprofitable" to mine, its mostly related to current prices and current DASH difficulty makes the benefit-to-cost non-existent. So technically yes, its TECHNICALLY profitable to mine DASH...
Also, is that a converter from 220 to 120 (i think you meant 110)? Or the other way around? Your wording was confusing, but if its the former, then you don't need a converter at all.
https://www.antminerdistribution.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/APW3-12-1600-user-guide.pdf
Well changing the vote would be a big deal, since the network has a hard on for shitty governance - now its hackable? But wouldn't they just unlock the MN 1000 DASH and dump it somewhere? But I guess it depends where you stored it... anyway...
It's dead BECAUSE of the rush. The network can't...
Bitcoin Segwit2x coin isn't the same as the one in November. I'm not really sure on its future as a viable crypto... but it might be a good pump and dump.
I'm sure the service would charge them for maintenance (thats why its a sharing SERVICE), so technically not infinite ROI. Still, the same applies for them based on the amount they charge them for maintaining the servers by the amount they get back.
You just priced the first assumption at the current valuation of $1000/DASH, and you don't expect to do the same with the valuation of your incoming DASH as well?
At 6.9 DASH/month, you're gaining at LEAST $6800 for every additional $100 you put in. Your valuation of an additional $800/month...
The better question is what's YOUR point? Why even bring up stratis when they have solved the liquidity issue, the hoarding of their currency, and bloated MN profits (not necessarily the way I would do it, but it works)? LOL.
Stratis also has a circulating supply of 98 million coins.
They also have less than a tenth of DASH masternode count.
And the ROI is substantially less (currently at 1% instead of DASH's 8%)
So they got the message. I don't need to save them.
Fair enough, but what I'm suggesting would prevent it from being a hurl from a high place. I won't save any of you, since you all came in early enough, but for future investors and DASH holders (who would definitely stand to lose more than you percentage wise).
None of what I'm writing is to...
Of course you don't understand, youre an MNO.
My main premise is that masternode governance was a good idea, but its profit system for doing absolutely nothing (also of which it does not adhere to a sliding difficulty rule such as miners have) has turned it into a bunker for hedgers and kept...
Then DASH is not digital cash, it's a corporation for profit now, profiting off of the later contributors to your system where the only winners are the ones that come in early enough, which brings me back to what I was saying on earlier threads that that vision is now dead, and we are only left...
True, but now we have to apply it in terms of many problems others are seeing with the currency today - specifically, the lack of liquidity and the race for hoarding as much of it as you can. In its current form, DASH reflects a mechanism for hyperdeflationary economics, where even the slightest...
No, the proper math is you ALSO gained $10,000 on each your own $100 contribution just like every non-MNO, PLUS an additional $7,500 (currently) for every $100 you spent (on server maintenance, lemme know if I can make this number more accurate) thereafter on a monthly basis (with no regard to...