Search results

  1. J

    v0.11.2.x Testing

    updated to latest version on tMN, also mixing on some other wallets.
  2. J

    v0.11.2.x Testing

    Mixing on 3 wallets also. Let's do this!
  3. J

    v0.11.2.x Testing

    tMN masternode up and running!
  4. J

    [DarkCoin Dice] | Play - Invest - With the Best |

    jiggytom, just deposited! Thanks for the bonus!
  5. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    "errors" : "Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues." } on 2198587
  6. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    24 will be the latest per Evan.
  7. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    someone must have compiled themselves.
  8. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    2015-02-13 17:48:41 spork - new 95a3d35f0d8f87fdc1f0ea4bffb5d1033a156268f210ed998b68f3ad1e4f795a ID 10000 Time 1443754538 bestHeight 219564 2015-02-13 17:48:51 CActiveMasternode::Dseep() - SendDarkSendElectionEntryPing vin =...
  9. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    x@ip-1x6:~$ ./darkcoind spork show { "SPORK_6_REPLAY_BLOCKS" : 2 } on one..other has x@ip-x1:~$ ./darkcoind spork show { "SPORK_1_MASTERNODE_PAYMENTS_ENFORCEMENT" : 1443844990, "Unknown" : 1444217600, "SPORK_6_REPLAY_BLOCKS" : -1 } and now: "SPORK_6_REPLAY_BLOCKS" : -1
  10. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    after update, both on 219552 4494.04
  11. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    Looks like there's an upgrade. v24
  12. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    I like it. Spork everyone.
  13. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    okay, both on 219547 now. success? 4283.665 on both
  14. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    whoa my one MN went backwards from 219544 to 219536. is this the automatic spork?
  15. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    wow resync works so fast. both on: 219544 4224.16. Did I do the right thing, or should I have not reindexed? Maybe allow a reconverge on Mainnet. Successful one would be insane!
  16. J

    v0.11.1 - InstantX Release

    is there a fork happening? 1 mn 219542 - 4260.86, now 219543 4308.58 1 mn 219538 - 4261.39
  17. J

    v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

    You live and you learn! This is how you become a better developer. Because next time you are going to think twice about it!
  18. J

    v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

    It's possible that your transaction size is large because you are using darksend...so the more inputs you have the larger the transaction size, the larger the fee. Gotta pay to be anonymous!
  19. J

    v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

    1 more Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 2/2/2015 18:43To: yGKU26vEFQmG35yeLHfEvJ5e8apPsc2hHXDebit: -10.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.100101 tDRKNet amount: -10.100101 tDRKTransaction ID...
  20. J

    v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

    and also: 2015-02-02 21:10:57 ProcessMessages(txlvote, 894 bytes) : Exception 'ReadCompactSize() : size too large' caught 2015-02-02 21:10:57 ProcessMessage(txlvote, 894 bytes) FAILED 2015-02-02 21:10:57 ProcessMessages(txlvote, 894 bytes) : Exception 'ReadCompactSize() : size too large' caught...
Back
Top