1 active masternode = 1 vote .
Out of the box, I like it. Side chains with a darkcore anyone?umm crazy idea. Keep darkcoin and launch dash as a new coin. Use darkcoin for first release of new features and for its privacy first cred and feed that innovation into dash.
And now IMHO rebranding decision must be made asap to give market the certainty about DRK.
umm crazy idea. Keep darkcoin and launch dash as a new coin. Use darkcoin for first release of new features and for its privacy first cred and feed that innovation into dash.
no premine for dash. There will always be trolls regardless.And dangerous idea also. Looks like a scam with Darkcoin and premine with DASH. Perfect present for enemy trolls.
I just had a thought, I hope eduffield has a chance to read.
Like crypto's defy all known logic in classic finances, I propose a very slight defiance to the classic rebranding philosophy. Lets keep the wonderful logo and call it DASH or whaver. Every other single aspect of the rebrand (forum, main website, twitter, email accounts, foundation, facebook, oh yeah, and the code for release too!) follows the professional advice of said PR company.
DASH, Ding-Dong, whatever, hopefully starting with D for my idea of course...
a) Keep the spirit of Darkcoin alive
b) Send a clear message to the crypto community, just like OpenBazaar did, of the mission statement actually having strong morals behind it, so much so it's community is willing to have a name change.
c) 98,37% of the world population still has no clue about BTC anyway, and the re-brand with this amazing team, would kick some serious but in the VC field.
A lot of people dissing the name - DASH is good it just needs getting used to. If someone in the street says 'whats Dash?' and someone says 'digital cash' they go 'oh yeh'. you have to think ahead with it
will that be cash, dash, or CC? asked the cashier.
digital cash. keep the D. most google searches are dash-cam stuff.. so SEO will not be very hard to overcome.
The more I think about it.. the more I like it. (the name change.)
also the masternode voting is good to.. each MN gets one vote.
masternode voting? I totally missed on that. What's the premisse?
. Then let each masternode take a vote. A masternode can send 1 DRK to one of 3 addresses each representing a candidate. Any transaction noise at the receiving addresses can be filtered by seeing if the originating 1000 DRK address was on the masternode list at the time of the vote. Multiple votes, or votes for multiple candidates from the same masternode are filtered away to ensure 1 masternode, 1 vote. There may need to be some special filtering rules for start-many MNs, but I'm sure there's a way to make it work.
Nah, just had a 7 lb. tyrant move in with me.