v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.

skillit

New Member
Sep 4, 2014
17
10
3
After downloading new version, I'm having the same issue (stuck at 1 hour behind) but only on laptop A.. Laptop B with new version (.15) didn't get hung up with 1 hour behind. Laptop A, Iam reindexing hopefully will fix the issue.. but unsure according to yidakee having the same issue.

And also before I noticed that laptop A was stuck with 1 hour behind, I sent a 32 tDrk IX from laptop B to A and watched it pop up as pending.

Waiting for reindex .. gonna start testing this baby out again :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
Guys, put some small amount of power to keep network moving, I'm mining with my macbook
Code:
getmininginfo

{
"blocks" : 104912,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00468909,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 449209,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : true,
"generate" : true,
"hashespersec" : 44724
}
Code:
proof-of-work found 
  hash: 0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99 
target: 000000c471000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Code:
getblock 0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99

{
"hash" : "0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99",
"confirmations" : 4,
"size" : 2476,
"height" : 104910,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "82f987d48c2c4c796562a57df69482071b174d260c69bd8a2bf24c83b73823db",
"tx" : [
"df9ab7101aac9409990590c338c98b821a68f6e7f6eba16dc8501e08718c6d52",
"0eb3c8a845820bd0fcc00479672ba88210f4fea6b85cb1549c9859d345e74c76",
"099b812e343a99ac60961be11d45d12f742d198ccb4e7b639a0d971a9f2ffc13"
],
"time" : 1423372728,
"nonce" : 1009784,
"bits" : "1e00c471",
"difficulty" : 0.00509050,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000595cf4a37679",
"previousblockhash" : "00000041221dbc97c5c71883faf34ed0df786295a5c1cdb1eb499a1091ea7425",
"nextblockhash" : "00000030ac54acfbbaae115096c7098ba56b31d00d00e0150a43d9fba510b1a8"
}
:cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raico and moli

souptacular

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Jun 7, 2014
62
73
158
TX
www.hudsonjameson.com
Guys, put some small amount of power to keep network moving, I'm mining with my macbook
Code:
getmininginfo

{
"blocks" : 104912,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00468909,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 449209,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : true,
"generate" : true,
"hashespersec" : 44724
}
Code:
proof-of-work found
  hash: 0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99
target: 000000c471000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Code:
getblock 0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99

{
"hash" : "0000007b64e9af32f7f00bcf0185a6acf926b0cd4de37b02c933348401b2ea99",
"confirmations" : 4,
"size" : 2476,
"height" : 104910,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "82f987d48c2c4c796562a57df69482071b174d260c69bd8a2bf24c83b73823db",
"tx" : [
"df9ab7101aac9409990590c338c98b821a68f6e7f6eba16dc8501e08718c6d52",
"0eb3c8a845820bd0fcc00479672ba88210f4fea6b85cb1549c9859d345e74c76",
"099b812e343a99ac60961be11d45d12f742d198ccb4e7b639a0d971a9f2ffc13"
],
"time" : 1423372728,
"nonce" : 1009784,
"bits" : "1e00c471",
"difficulty" : 0.00509050,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000595cf4a37679",
"previousblockhash" : "00000041221dbc97c5c71883faf34ed0df786295a5c1cdb1eb499a1091ea7425",
"nextblockhash" : "00000030ac54acfbbaae115096c7098ba56b31d00d00e0150a43d9fba510b1a8"
}
:cool:
I'd be happy to help testnet mine. Is there a guide on mining testnet? I'll also start up my testnet masternode in a few minutes.
 

spatula

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Oct 31, 2014
49
39
158
I'd be happy to help testnet mine. Is there a guide on mining testnet? I'll also start up my testnet masternode in a few minutes.
you can mine from the wallet.

In the debug window type: setgenerate true
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
My wallet just synced.

{
"version" : 110115,
"protocolversion" : 70065,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 1000.00000000,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 104919,
"timeoffset" : -2,
"connections" : 20,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00528361,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1423369848,
"keypoolsize" : 1001,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
 
S

snogcel

Guest
to testnet mine, just open debug window and type:

setgenerate true

so easy, I just hit two blocks then my wallet synched :-D
 
  • Like
Reactions: souptacular

spatula

Well-known Member
Foundation Member
Oct 31, 2014
49
39
158
My wallet just synced.

This is what I show after just finishing a reindex, you are a few blocks ahead of me. My other wallets are on even different forks. Which is the right one??


{
"version" : 110115,
"protocolversion" : 70065,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 477.56867700,
"darksend_balance" : 69.20069200,
"blocks" : 104914,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00478658,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1423179831,
"keypoolsize" : 1011,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
 
S

snogcel

Guest
my daemon getinfo:

{
"version" : 110115,
"protocolversion" : 70065,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 673.09219400,
"darksend_balance" : 672.40672400,
"blocks" : 104920,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"connections" : 10,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00521271,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1421210568,
"keypoolsize" : 1001,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
This is what I show after just finishing a reindex, you are a few blocks ahead of me. My other wallets are on even different forks. Which is the right one??


{
"version" : 110115,
"protocolversion" : 70065,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 477.56867700,
"darksend_balance" : 69.20069200,
"blocks" : 104914,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00478658,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1423179831,
"keypoolsize" : 1011,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
I think I'm on the right chain. Same with snogcel.
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
The hash rate is so low.. I wish this were for real on the real Darkcoin! :D

{
"blocks" : 104926,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00448958,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 303314,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : true,
"generate" : true,
"hashespersec" : 17725
}
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
Windows v.11.1.15... Doesn't look like an IX transaction, does it? hmm.....

upload_2015-2-8_1-11-46.png
 

moli

Grizzled Member
Aug 5, 2014
3,255
1,830
1,183
Woohoo!!! Just mined a block!

Still no IX... Is this because of the network?
 

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
Woohoo!!! Just mined a block!

Still no IX... Is this because of the network?
most MNs are on "old" (half day old) version, need to wait for them to update :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: moli

skillit

New Member
Sep 4, 2014
17
10
3
Testing IX with 5 tDrk transaction - seems to be working a lot better than bigger transactions.

I have a few more snips.
#1 of a 100 tDrk transaction - failed
#2 of a 10 tDrk transaction that disappeared and did not show up in my other wallet, no notification of the transaction at all and on the transactions Tab , it shows a little grey box rather than a clock waiting for the transaction to be confirmed.
 

Attachments

flare

Administrator
Dash Core Team
Moderator
May 18, 2014
2,286
2,404
1,183
Germany
Updated 10 masternodes - i still see two chains, which is the correct one?

Code:
darkcoind getblockhash 104869

000000e57738f787e1c0c3a05981c3feea46c621fb7f0826108411f815f8876e

or

0000000dc1f58ccd290fd5fff42db22f3dae08dc4455ed40f652c22541cbe44b
 

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
Updated 10 masternodes - i still see two chains, which is the correct one?

Code:
darkcoind getblockhash 104869

000000e57738f787e1c0c3a05981c3feea46c621fb7f0826108411f815f8876e

or

0000000dc1f58ccd290fd5fff42db22f3dae08dc4455ed40f652c22541cbe44b
I'm on second one - "blocks" : 104972,
 

TanteStefana

Grizzled Member
Foundation Member
Mar 9, 2014
2,871
1,863
1,283
Hummm, I'm getting:

Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 10 of 20 signatures ), broadcast through 12 node(s)Date: 2/8/2015 00:04To: splawik21 yKM7cfYhL3qe4gJLs8ki6xDW1igXa82MJcDebit: -15.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -15.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 36df0d1c213012f1ef797c21d71e79f4be19be7b721df589f6683bad74982066-000

Now finally:
Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 10 of 20 signatures ), broadcast through 12 node(s)Date: 2/8/2015 00:04To: splawik21 yKM7cfYhL3qe4gJLs8ki6xDW1igXa82MJcDebit: -15.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -15.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 36df0d1c213012f1ef797c21d71e79f4be19be7b721df589f6683bad74982066-000

Been a while...
blocks" : 104982

I think I'm on the wrong fork, as the difficulty is < 0.009....
 
S

snogcel

Guest
Question: what happens when you run out of denominated coins? Doing IX testing I seem to have ran out of 1 tDRK amounts.... do I have to just resend back to myself to split these up again? Would be really nice if the wallet could detect this and give the option automatically

2015-02-08_0231.png

Edit: mined coins started to confirm and IX picked those up, and started denoming smaller amounts again. Would this have happened again otherwise?
 
Last edited:

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,720
840
183
looks like we still have problems getting the MN's to gather enough signatures (it needs 20 of 20) to make it an InstantX confirmation

Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 11 of 20 signatures ), broadcast through 14 node(s)
Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 11 of 20 signatures ),
Status: 5/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 11 of 20 signatures ), broadcast through 14 node(s)

note : those 1 & 5 confirmed are from POW and this was a darksended InstantX with v0.11.1.15
 

Sub-Ether

Well-known Member
Mar 31, 2014
1,516
1,256
183
No instantX but my debug thinks I'm unforked, it happened cleared at height=89418

2015-02-08 10:06:05 CheckBlock() : fork detected, skipping masternode payment checks
2015-02-08 10:06:05 UpdateTip: new best=000000010a1ecf9e87db17d2d752d13130eb657f89e304624c04944e603a5dab height=89418 log2_work=46.391698 tx=187566 date=2015-01-09 21:05:42 progress=0.926940
2015-02-08 10:06:05 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

I got 6 zero's in getblockhash, is 7 the correct chain as it represent a higher difficulty?

'00000042cee8a8e52ff21ebd07ed476ec7f7b1b8a38100b049e981ed565bed63'
 

qwizzie

Well-known Member
Aug 6, 2014
1,720
840
183
well to be honest i did a re-index and delete of the peers.dat on 6 wallets and only 1 of those 6 wallets got fully synced in the end.
The other 5 wallets got stuck first at still 5 hrs to sync and then few minutes later it suddenly jumped to still 7 hours to sync. (closing and restarting didnt help)

I ended up copy and pasting the blockchain from the wallet that got fully synced to the wallets that didnt and gave them all a -rescan
at startup. That fixed it for me.

Current block : 105101
Time : 13:06 (GMT+1)
MN count : 70
 
Last edited by a moderator:

acidburn

Active Member
May 26, 2014
467
175
113
Surely we need more masternodes? If so, I'll see if I can fire one up on azure. (Got a few free servers for nothing)
 

UdjinM6

Official Dash Dev
Core Developer
Dash Core Team
May 20, 2014
3,639
3,537
1,183
Surely we need more masternodes? If so, I'll see if I can fire one up on azure. (Got a few free servers for nothing)
I think we are good now, I see 53 MNs on the latest 70065 protocol.
 

whocares

Member
Aug 15, 2014
46
13
48
I tried to make an IX tx with the latest wallet, but without success.
It confirms as normal tx at the end.

ix-15.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raico
Status
Not open for further replies.