v0.11.1.x InstantX Testing

[yidakee]

thx! (newbie me)

fixed it for you :wink:

 

[brownmon]

pretty sure that's 0.1% not 1%.

I think it's 1%.

 

[droptable]

:tongue:

i m a Darkcoiner since April 2014.
but i use the most feature complete Wallet out there: Paperwallet.

so i open the QT only for testing,
and i was used to the dropdown in the sending menu....

 

[test3r]

send a few coins to y4kZeoqfydWfyBFfMGBRVnZrJPpv2MCCSk ill send it back in 5-6 times
ty i have now enought
send me 5 addresses

 

[Sub-Ether]

test.p2pool.masternode.io:18998 is down again, wallet only mining I guess.

Sends as a normal transaction with sending darksend and instantX at the same time, but instantX alone goes about 50% of the time.

 

[Sub-Ether]

Fleece me at,
yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqq

I would like to help testing on testnet, but I'm new to this. Anyone that can help me along?

1 out of 3 worked for instantX (without darksend)
Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 1 node(s)Date: 05/02/2015 13:37To: Luc yEJFAyVVHDmSNDHKxkLZ7PKpYBUK6u3F2UDebit: -66.60 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -66.61 tDRKTransaction ID: d7e258f258dc61d7ac350471339986074f88c99e8cbb9a262479c809995984e0-000

send a few coins to y4kZeoqfydWfyBFfMGBRVnZrJPpv2MCCSk ill send it back in 5-6 times

instantX alone worked, but not with darksend.(2 out of 3)
Status: 7 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 1 node(s)Date: 05/02/2015 13:29To: test3r y4kZeoqfydWfyBFfMGBRVnZrJPpv2MCCSkDebit: -22.22 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -22.23 tDRKTransaction ID: c2d1debb09da2215b7e57acc8019f752c35ad40de12ab954d44afdb37d568d93-000

 

[test3r]

IX
Status: 1/unconfirmedDate: 2/5/2015 14:46To: yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -5.111 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -5.121 tDRKTransaction ID: c95a08086aa08d6d4043c113e5506b404b103398be5d57e436ffe8657e976ce8-000

normal one
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 7 node(s)Date: 2/5/2015 14:52To: yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -1.111 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.0001 tDRKNet amount: -1.1111 tDRKTransaction ID: 7a42586c2864da1b19851f610e67367e8467049bafe26fa89fef871b881b602d-000

i will send few more only IX in few minutes

 

[test3r]

IX

Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 1 node(s)Date: 2/5/2015 15:10To: Sub-Ether yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -10.111 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -10.121 tDRKTransaction ID: 6d70169191de114224dca72b55b4355f7379163a62f4308a137f2bb8bea9820d-000

IX

Status: 0/offline, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 2/5/2015 15:11To: Sub-Ether yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -13.111 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -13.121 tDRKTransaction ID: 6216aad17277fae7413973989461958fe4eda0874eda627d5f39aacc994245c4-000

 

[moli]

InstantX doesn't seem to work for Windows version 11.1.8:
The transaction has no fee and looks like a non-IX transaction.

 

[mastermined]

I think it's 1%.

looking at it again i think you and tante are right. 1% is too much, hopefully this is just on testnet.

 

[moli]

I just Darksent a non-IX transaction, but it has a fee, even though with 0/unconfirmed it's broadcast thru 8 nodes.
The non-IX and IX transactions seem to be conflicting and I haven't got an IX transaction that says something like "5/confirmed..." at all with windows version 11.1.8.

 

[test3r]

IX

Status: 0/unconfirmed, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 2/5/2015 15:56To: Sub-Ether yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -55.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -55.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 2691d1094cc6e52c28c4cf1993fa1f1215b7906488244d8edb0cb83f1449f71e-000

win 8.1 x64

 

[yidakee]

Here you go Sub-Ether

I have depth=60 in the config file, and as soon as I hit "send" I get this.

Status: 60 confirmations (verified via instantx), has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 2/5/15 15:06
To: Sub-Ether 2 yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqq
Debit: -111.00 tDRK
Transaction fee: -0.01 tDRK
Net amount: -111.01 tDRK
Transaction ID: 6bcca7774b673a5742ed28fc9472afa64a8cbc62dec84b2d9f5f55a6442391f4-000

This was in the time it takes to move the mouse to the tx tab and right click to verify. Is there any other way to check that the 60 confirms is not just cosmetic ?

 

[test3r]

IX

Status: 0/unconfirmed, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 2/5/2015 15:56To: Sub-Ether yG466d8XLyemNKQCEZ3RReoLNTGwHpjfqqDebit: -55.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.01 tDRKNet amount: -55.01 tDRKTransaction ID: 2691d1094cc6e52c28c4cf1993fa1f1215b7906488244d8edb0cb83f1449f71e-000

win 8.1 x64

only 1 out of 5 was saying (verified via instantx) even that one looks now like a normal one

 

[UdjinM6]

Is this the cost intended for IX? That's 1% of the transaction?!?!

Oh, and it didn't work ;P no instant transaction. I suppose that's what Evan was talking about with IX issues. Finally, I second that there should be a visual on the send tab to show IX accepted the payment

Explanation to this ^^^ and all quotes about 1% or 0.1%:
It's not only IX but also a DS transaction and you can spend 10 DRK by using 1x10.0010000 or 10x1.0001000 denoms. As there must be no "dead change" everything higher than 10 DRK goes to miners as a fee. So fee for DS itself in this situation would be 0.001 DRK.
BUT IX has a minimum fee of 0.01 DRK
https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/blob/v0.11.1.x/src/wallet.cpp#L1905
That means that for IX transaction you need to pay 10.01 DRK (including fee) but fee left from DS is only 0.001 DRK and that's why you need to use another 0.1 denomination to pay all fees.

 

[mastermined]

looking at it again i think you and tante are right. 1% is too much, hopefully this is just on testnet.

actually it's about one penny so that's cool!
sorry, i know this is not the right thread for this.
thanks to everybody that is testing instantX. very exciting.

 

[moli]

These are No Darksend transactions. (windows v.11.1.8)
The first transaction is a non-InstantX.
The second transaction is an InstantX tx. (it says "Darksent" but it's actually not Darksent, something is conflicted.)

 

[eduffield]

************************************** 11.1.9 ***************************************

Everyone please update to v9 and restart with --reindex, this should work much better!

- Version / Protocol bump
- Improved feedback for IX
- Fixed a couple segfaults
- DS progress bar calculations (Udjin)

Compiling: If you get a 404 please try again in a bit

Source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/tree/v0.11.1.x

Windows 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...04/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/darkcoin-qt.exe

Mac OS X:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DR...n-osx-darkcoin-dist/darkcoin-0.11.1.9-osx.dmg

Linux 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/.../gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...09/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoind

Linux 64bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/.../gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...09/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoind

 

[TanteStefana]

pretty sure that's 0.1% not 1%.

0.10 dark for sending 10 dark should be 1% no?

actually it's about one penny so that's cool!
sorry, i know this is not the right thread for this.
thanks to everybody that is testing instantX. very exciting.

about $0.19

Hummm we're on 11.1.8? I can't IX on 11.1.7, gonna try 8 now....

 

[UdjinM6]

0.10 dark for sending 10 dark should be 1% no?

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-x-instantx-release-testing.3826/page-22#post-40387

Hummm we're on 11.1.8? I can't IX on 11.1.7, gonna try 8 now....

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-x-instantx-release-testing.3826/page-22#post-40394

:grin: