• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

v0.10.15 - Onyx Release

Are we discussing this ShadowCash merger initiative anywhere in DCT? Please post the link if you know.
 
I get this error on only one of my MNs after updating:
I type "./darkcoind getinfo" and at the bottom...
"errors" : "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Is this common? I see the MN active with the updated version on drk.mn
 
I get this error on only one of my MNs after updating:
I type "./darkcoind getinfo" and at the bottom...
"errors" : "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Is this common? I see the MN active with the updated version on drk.mn
make sure you see correct version in getinfo output
Code:
"version" : 101519,
 
how is suchpool? :) they were lucky last times to be forked ;)
so far so good ;)
 
I know, but this doesn't matter: at the time of the masternode-payment (2014-11-01 21:12:03) this address did definitely NOT have a 1000 DRK vin, therefore shouldn't have gotten a payment at all.
If I remember correctly this should already have been fixed with v0.10.15.13, that's why I tagged Evan to have a closer look...
eduffield sadly it's not fixed :(
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/00000000001710bfbe26f92a3deebca22df4cd4ed57506f8b5dac7af47c3a4b8
Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9
 
this could be the answer if vins are checked only before going to winners list... let's see if there will be another one...
I wish it was the reason. Probable.
 
I wish it was the reason. Probable.
at least he is not in the list now
Code:
> darkcoind masternode list pubkey | grep Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9
gives empty result BUT vin is in the list
Code:
> darkcoind masternode list vin | grep 42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b
"54.187.163.127:9999" : "42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b",
because there was 2 outputs by 1000 DRK each
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b
could this be the issue?

EDIT: it also could correspond with the one I reported earlier
masternode list vin command output seems a bit confusing
Code:
> darkcoind masternode list vin | awk '{ print $3 }' | sort | uniq -c | sort | grep -v " 1 """
gives
Code:
      2
      9 "e1e64ffaa566c4e07a0c99c9a6aa216f1fb3a520856ef07694480d14f25e775f",
At first sight this means that 9 MNs have the same vin...
Actually in that particular example it's ok because this transaction has 9 outputs by 1000 DRKs each
http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/e1e64ffaa566c4e07a0c99c9a6aa216f1fb3a520856ef07694480d14f25e775f
I'm sure output index info is available internally so wouldn't it be better to provide it in command output too to avoid such confusions?
eduffield ?
 
Back
Top