- Dec 14, 2014
You mean it was not contentious as determined subjectively by community observers? Obviously the clear vote result proved that it was not contentious after-the-fact.The 2MB block size increase was not contentious. And there was also a binary choice. We sadly have a multiple choice question that is highly contentious.
As soon as platform goes live we can have contracts for voting, and we can perform these types of votes with ease, until then we can either use the voting system used for trust protectors (that has very little engagement), or we can use the dao system that was made for funding.
Perhaps the way to avoid contention when using the budget funding system to poll the network is to submit only binary choices.