Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

Budget Proposal: Peter Todd to review Instant X?

Discussion in 'Pre + Budget Proposal Discussions' started by JuanSGalt, Mar 1, 2016.

?

Should DASH pay Peter Todd to review Instant X?

Poll closed Apr 1, 2016.
  1. Hell Yeah

    28 vote(s)
    43.1%
  2. Fuck no

    37 vote(s)
    56.9%
  1. JuanSGalt

    JuanSGalt Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So I know there's mixed feelings about Todd, but he is well known in blockchain tech and is very much focused in the field of zero confirmation txs and fast payments or lack there of.

    Not sure who else would be good to do some third party review of instant x, but never the less I asked him and here is his response.

    screenshot.1456864424.jpg

    So yup! Todd will review Instant X code for 150 USD / hour.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  2. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    696
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Well, thats.. unexspected. From the very man that called Dash "snake oil". Anyways i think now is not the right time as Dash Evolution will change a lot
    and it will need time to get developed and tested properly. I also see risks with using Peter Todd ....
     
    • Like Like x 11
  3. MangledBlue

    MangledBlue Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    678
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I personal can't see him and/or any review he does as being an un-biased reviewed.
    But with that said - would he actually damage his 'reputation" for DASH?
    hummmmmm


    edit: withholding my vote for now....
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    696
    Trophy Points:
    183
    i cant help but notice the end date of this poll by the way :D
     
    • Like Like x 3
  5. oaxaca

    oaxaca Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    832
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Evolution will be a long time coming. Instantx should be ready enough for this. Bring it on!

    Juan - get the almighty Todd to give you his DASH address so the block reward funding can go directly to him.

    Double win!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. InTheWoods

    InTheWoods Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    943
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Todd is a Monero investor & fan. Not sure he's the right man for the job. I very much doubt it. He's against everything Dash stands for, being real digital cash. He's also an overpriced consultant. Not worth wasting money on him.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. Macrochip

    Macrochip Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    184
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Short answer: Fuck that guy.

    Long answer: He's an abrasive human being and a PITA, zero people skills, always looking to start an argument, attacking Gavin and Jeff from out of the blue (just recently on Twitter on why they call themselves "Core developers", the nerve of that douchebag!) and basically a neckbeard without the beard (See Maxwell for that).
    That was just character traits, I know, but the argument that he's somehow qualified to do the review just because he wrote a double spend tool and trolled Coinbase with it is laughable.
    There's tons of serious, respected researchers able to pull off that job and actually deliver a credible result (something I will never expect from Todd).
    Wuille, van der Laan, Andresen come to mind. What about Vitalik Buterin? All these people are (at least publicly) unbiased potential judges and peer-reviewers of Evan's work. Strongly opposed to this suggestion.

    PS:
    His rate is also ridiculous. How much did we pay Kristov Atlas to review DarkSend? Damn sure it wasn't 1,500+ USD !!
     
    • Like Like x 9
  8. toknormal

    toknormal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    103
    +1 I don't think he's very professional. He's more of a celebrity than a professional.

    The right way to get a technical review done (if that's really what this is about) is to find a sleepy academic department out in the 'real world' that's got no axe to grind other than analytical rigour. Fund a couple of PHD students or something to produce a report that will be useful to the project.

    If Peter Todd is being sought for his celebrity status ("well known in blockchain tech") rather than his reputation for dispassionate rigour, then don't be surprised if it ends up as a "celebrity put down" rather than a rigerous appraisal.

    He's already given his verdict on record anyway. So why pay him $150 an hour just to type it out ?
     
    • Like Like x 6
  9. raganius

    raganius cryptoPag.com
    Foundation Member Masternode Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2014
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    1,162
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Personally, I would never trust Peter Todd... for anything.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  10. TheDashGuy

    TheDashGuy Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2015
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    1,010
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I would like to minus 1 vote from the yes category, I didn't realize how much it would cost. We'd be better off hiring someone not so ill-hearted towards Dash.

    Data can be spun. That is all.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. italx

    italx Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2014
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    158
    I really think it would be impossible for him to do a impartial review.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. orbitboy

    orbitboy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    8
    I think everyone has said everything I've been thinking. No Thanks.

    I think this is the top middle and bottom of all this. Very politely put.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. toknormal

    toknormal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Going back to Juan S Galt's original initiative, despite my views on the proposed reviewer, I still think the idea's worthwhile in its own right. (The idea of getting it reviewed that is).

    But it would be for technical purposes rather than promotional purposes IMO. The thing is, 0-conf transactions are a very big challenge and a huge number of them do get used for goods exchange in the Bitcoin world. So the more understanding that there is of the strength's and weaknesses around InstantX's approach the better IMO.

    The problem with Todd reviewing it is that it's just going to get spun to death whatever the outcome. Just simple due-diligence tells you it's a non-option. The project does need reviews like this but ones that can be learned from away from the adversarial politics of bitcoin celebrity, altcoin wars and general promotional hype that all these assets are subject to.

    Also, another thing. Anyone who's got any experience of this type of stuff would know that even as a client, you have work to do in setting the parameters and demanding from the contractor that certain questions be answered in a quantifiable way. You're not looking for an opinion - you're looking for results and a level of analytical rigour that allows you to direct your future priorities. That involves a good deal of work in specifying the review. It isn't the same as asking someone to write a magazine article on whether gold's going to rally this month.

    The way this is worded is that it's just a blank sheet for PT to mouth off on disguised as technical appraisal. He might actually be competent enough to do such an appraisal (being generous) but you'd have to get him to come up with analysis, not conclusions. For example, he has alluded to the fact that InstantX is "breakeable" and will be broken in no time. Well MD5 hashing was "broken" but it's still in full use all over the place. Bitcoin 0-confs are as broken as a chocolate teapot and yet they're still in use all over the place. InstantX is, however not broken. So many things are clearly a question of degree in terms of being fit for purpose. This is what needs to be investigated, fully understood and quantified in terms of risks and rewards. That would not be a futile exercise in my opinion, but it takes a very balanced and dispassionate approach to come up with meaningful results that aren't just an endorsement of the reviewer's own prejudices.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  14. InTheWoods

    InTheWoods Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    943
    Trophy Points:
    263
    It's probably best to hold of any reviews until Evolution or the next Dash version. InstantX will get some significant improvements I believe.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. crowning

    crowning Well-known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Since he already labeled Dash "snake oil" without thoroughly research he'd make himself noncredible if, after researching it for money, he'd come up with a different result.
     
    • Like Like x 12
  16. yidakee

    yidakee Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,812
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Shit, I voted yes by mistake, what a ding-dong.

    Peter Todd has lost credibility and reputation. He's is terribly pedantic, too immature and hot-headed to be trusted with such a thing. If he fixes open-source code, bless him, otherwise, no thanks.

    .
     
    #16 yidakee, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 2, 2016
    • Like Like x 1
  17. TaoOfSatoshi

    TaoOfSatoshi Grizzled Member
    Linguistic Dash Nation Founder Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    I hate Peter Todd. I'm all for a review, however. Let's just find someone who is so less blatantly anti-Dash.

    I'm conducting a poll on Twitter, to see what the casuals think.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. HinnomTX

    HinnomTX Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2014
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Let's put the ugly tweets, ad hominems and personality conflicts aside. DASH is not taken seriously in some circles because of a lack of peer reviews (and they may be right to snub us). We should be hiring serious Bitcoin brains to audit InstantX. If Peter is in for $1500 (about 400 DASH), let's hire him. No one in the community wants to see a fork or double spend because of an exploit found in InstantX.

    Also... interesting things happen when you're getting paid. Peter might come away impressed that we voted for and funded this operation from the blockchain. If nothing else it will further the most compelling part of our story: we are getting stuff done through DGBB and the budget proposal system.
     
    #18 HinnomTX, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 2, 2016
    • Like Like x 2
  19. SnowHater

    SnowHater Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't see the actual proposal on the dashwhale. Or it is just preproposal discussion?
     
  20. InTheWoods

    InTheWoods Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    943
    Trophy Points:
    263
    What your saying would make perfect sense in a different context. This is Peter Todd we're talking about though. He hates the idea of Dash, crypto as real money. Dash opted for the revolutionary path some XT, Unlimited and Classic folks desired but couldn't do with Bitcoin. Todd doesn't want crypto as money but merely as a niche subversion tool of sorts. Do you know what anarcho-communists think of money? They think money is evil. Ask his friend, the communist Amir Taaki.

    He is invested in Monero and few hundred dollars won't suddenly turn him from Monero to Dash fan.

    Even if he were to do a code review, results would suck. He would come up with some stupid idea like his Replace By Fee which just killed Bitcoin for retail. This guy is like the anti-Dash dev. I bet he'd say something silly like InstantX is some centralized system relying centralized servers or some lame crap like that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  21. TaoOfSatoshi

    TaoOfSatoshi Grizzled Member
    Linguistic Dash Nation Founder Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    From Twitter so far: 67% support! Still early, though.
     
  22. InTheWoods

    InTheWoods Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    943
    Trophy Points:
    263
    On the forum the real vote count is 13 Yes - 17 No. Two people voted Yes by mistake.
     
  23. TaoOfSatoshi

    TaoOfSatoshi Grizzled Member
    Linguistic Dash Nation Founder Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    Trophy Points:
    1,183
    Cool. Looks like the desire is there to review it.

    Switching gears, who would be a reasonable candidate to review InstantX?
     
  24. JuanSGalt

    JuanSGalt Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I asked Kristov, He said no, for now. Getting a Bitcoin Core dev to review it would be big media wize. What's Maxwell's rate? xD
     
  25. TroyDASH

    TroyDASH Well-known Member
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    793
    Trophy Points:
    183
    What do we expect to gain from an InstantX code review?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  26. stan.distortion

    stan.distortion Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    491
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Anyone suitable to do a review that's found fault with Peter Todds work in the past? It didn't sound like a bad idea at first but yeah, that wouldn't be an unbiased review.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  27. JuanSGalt

    JuanSGalt Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Legitimacy, a lot of people are mistified by instantx and the maximilianist bitcoin folk are in denial.

    DASH's privacy is great, but that along is not good enough sadly, not with Adam Back working on confidential txs for Bitcoin. Instant x is essential for DASH as money, if this is the direction we want to go. If so, then we need make sure everyone gets how well it works.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  28. InTheWoods

    InTheWoods Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    943
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Confidential tx requires bigger block sizes, much bigger. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ml3y5/an_open_question_to_adam_back/cvg9foh

    Not sure this will happen anytime soon given how stuck Bitcoin development is and how reluctant Core is to increase blocksize. 2MB won't be enough to implement this I'm afraid.

    InstantX amounts will be increased in the next few months. Maybe wait until then for a review.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  29. oaxaca

    oaxaca Well-known Member
    Foundation Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    832
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Even if the review does not go ahead, the screenshots of Juan discussing it with Pope Todd would be marketing GOLD.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  30. HinnomTX

    HinnomTX Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2014
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    103
    So let's get someone from Team Classic to review it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, right? Whoah, wait. What about Mike Hearn? Does he freelance? :cool:
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page