Search results

I wouldn't call my reaction knee-jerk but rather just a genuine disapproval of how this entire scenario was handled. First of all, where is a genuine vote that the majority of stakeholders want to have a name-change? Then we could actually move on and discuss a name change officially. Instead...

Well, I beg to differ, one market has already invited DRK in and I think it's only the beginning of everything, why change for the sake of some quick buck when the long term goal is what really counts? Anyways, I learned very early that discussing such things with authorities NEVER works, so I...

Well hello there name change? I haven't heard any official news at all that we needed a name-change? On every channel I lurk there wasn't an info about this other than in the official announcements that popped into my RSS feeder a few days ago, so how exactly is this being discussed for a year...

I can only concur with vertoe yidakee and probably many others that didn't catch my eye in the long thread. Re-branding the entire name that this project represents has some very bad aftertaste for me, not to forget keeping the entire community in the dark about this. There was already problems...

Thanks moli, this is what I was looking for :) Thanks as well for the heads-up, this will make my life a lot easier and cheaper! Much <3 to the DRK!

Thanks guys for the heads-up! It's working really well for me right now, albeit a bit slow bit rather safe than sorry, right :D Just ONE more question and I will go back to my cave: "Is it ok to have a max of let's say 1000DRK/16Rounds configured in the client while only actually having a few...

Thanks :D And just because I don't want to move through dozens of pages of text: How often do I have to pay the 0.1DRK collateral fee? and is it ok if I stop mixing during the process or logout or do I need to wait until the progress bar is complete?

Would you suggest 16 rounds to be on the safe side vertoe ?

Very interesting, the new web experience 3.0 perhaps :)

Looks to me as if you are using outdated software, algorithm as well as pool ;)

I think it's just some misunderstanding, judging the post now :)

That's why I wondered why the instantX hard-fork was supposedly centralizing the Darkcoin Blockchain, other than by continuing to use Masternodes, which aint' centralized in my opinion.

https://discuss.nubits.com/t/darkcoin-introduces-proof-of-service-and-rewards-users-for-running-special-servers-called-masternodes/1445

That's what I am asking the forum oblox Did any code change in the last 2 updates or why exactly the hard-fork that is necessary? I read in other forums that it changed the system to be more centralized so I just wanted to hear some inside news or if it's just FUD :) ===============...

I heard due to the necessary hard-forks, the entire network runs very centralized now, is this true and why is this being called out?

Time to come back to 1.60$ :3

Well done :)

Due to the lack of interest and the moon-project DRK decided to undertake while I was patiently awaiting replies, this search is finished for now :D

Couldn't you guys have waited for my buy later this week? :P

Does that mean that Darkcoin went Open Source? :3