Search results

The pool has been updated for the latest daemon and payment system. 10.15.13 Happy Mining!

Seeing this in the debug file. 2014-10-10 16:27:09 DarkCoinMiner: 2014-10-10 16:27:09 proof-of-work found hash: 0000000ecc2d921be90ace58bd680ea1fecadeb99a410b8c150cf8f90bf40ac9 target: 00000013f5390000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2014-10-10 16:27:09...

I've thought about it some more. 281 total txt's can't be the total number of transactions in the wallet if I had inputs of 930. That by itself should be 930+281 tx's. I used the darkcoind listunspent command to dump all the current transactions to a text file then filtered them with grep...

Ok, so I've been trying to see why the wallet file grew so large. Darkcoind works fine btw just not QT. Doing darkcoind listunspent, dumping it to a text file and greping "txid" I've returned a total count of 281 transactions. So for some reason, with only 281 transactions, about 10 imported...

Update After consolidating all the dust the QT wallet is still unresponsive and inoperable. Could this possibly be due to the wallet.dat size itself? ~/.darkcoin $ ls -lh wallet.dat -rw------- 1 propulsion propulsion 28M Oct 8 18:31 wallet.dat

Alright, I consolidated 930 inputs into a grand total of three. Funny thing is my wallet actually grew from 21 Mb's to 28Mb's. I'm going to let the transactions confirm and then see if the issue resolves. Here are the TX's if any of you are interested. { "account" : "p2pool"...

This seriously could be it. :) Check out this address; it was from the old p2pool. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?Xn71EFztHqAeCnGZvkipWh6rsV2q3YKFUT.htm I'll consolidate all those inputs into one input and report back.

"version" : 101401, "protocolversion" : 70038, "walletversion" : 60001,

I have the latest version of the daemon installed. 10.*.*. For some reason, the QT wallet is completely unresponsive and max's out the CPU on my computer. The 9.*.* version never gave me an issue before. I've tried building from source and also flare's precompiled version. The regular daemon...

QT wallet is pegging the CPU to 100% for me. I have to wait five minutes minimum just to attempt to use it. propulsion@S7 ~/.darkcoin $ (darkcoin-qt:9340): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_get_direction: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed I'm seeing the above error while it hangs...

It's not working fully. 2 factor does not verify new codes. Placing orders does not work. Withdrawals aren't working Markets previously listed are gone and not showing balances Also moved this thread to Exchanges..

Excellent! Also The DarkcoinTalk Pool is fully supporting the enforcement.

I have a VPN provider that I can share the login info with you if need be. After you are done, I'll simply change the credentials. You'll be able to access the tubes over an encrypted connection with no issues. (except for email the ports are blocked) If you are interested send me a GPG key...

Well, according to Wolf from BCT, it can be improved upon by 400%. I don't know how feasible that actually is though. At this point in time, I'd like to see some development towards FPGA's to be honest with you.

Multisignature addresses come from the Bitcoin client itself. Any coin forked from it should already have it.

That's a cool idea. Last I heard Kristov will be auditing the XC code the same way as he did for Darkcoin.

Based on my cost analyzation that's not bad. Especially considering how some people are claiming that the mining can be improved upon by 400%.

eduffield Your solution "to sync a list across the whole network." Do you mean you are taking every single MN into account and distributing the 20% MN reward to every MN? Are you also proposing to increase the block reward; As it is now with 5 darkcoin per block, are you proposing 5.25 per...

Getting rid of miners entirely is one of the worst ideas possible. If the masternodes are the only entities that create coins, then the currency has just become 100% Proof of Stake. Some of you are going "Hey that's great, I have MN's lets do this!" Let me try to explain why that's a bad line...

So roughly $55 a month instead of $130?