Search results

In my opinion... When the Masternodes vote to spend dash, they are spending the entire dash network's money, not their money. I am claiming this because (1) the Masternodes would not otherwise have possession of the unused budget, and (2) the inflation caused by adding to the circulating supply...

In everyone else's POV it's a normal discussion among community members about what we want the decision-making process on an issue to involve. In your POV it is a perfect opportunity to expose Dash for its pervasive delusion, lies, and denial. So dramatic. It must be very exciting to see things...

Are we discussing whether the code should be open source, or are we discussing who should decide whether the code should be open source?

Hi, there is already a rebranding effort underway - Original proposal: https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/proposal-marketing-communication-october.16913/ Latest update:

I support the concept, but from what I have seen thus far, I would bet that this would be unlikely to pass a vote right now. Recommend saving yourself the 5 dash proposal fee

We already outsource responsibility to Dash Core Group. Are you okay with this? Why should the MNOs be okay with acknowledging their obvious technical incompetency and outsourcing granular technical decisions, but not acknowledging their obvious marketing incompetency and outsourcing granular...

The actual cost to the network is dependent on the number/size of transactions, and is not at all dependent on the value of the transactions, which is one reason to limit the free-transaction subsidy via the former way and not the latter.

You're absolutely right, we should shift the decimal there too. Version 123000

I would urge everyone to take the time to read through this. This is an important governance decision. I think the argument is compelling, and I fully support this proposal.

It very well could be the same thing that is an issue for both users and investors alike. In either case, yes, I would agree that it should be obscured away, but I also don't like if obscuring it away means that users don't see "DASH" when they are using Dash.

It's different for JPY. People are used to working with large whole numbers. No one is used to working with decimals that have several leading zeros. It's a usability issue. Everybody keeps responding to this saying we don't need that kind of investor, but that is not at all the reason that this...

You would be right if the value of cryptos today was primarily derived from their utility. Which is ultimately what needs to happen, but isn't the case. Much of the value of cryptocurrencies today are driven by speculators, many of whom don't know or care about the fundamentals as much as making...

Dashvotetracker gets the masternode count from the Dashninja API, and the Dashninja API is not returning the correct number (see https://www.dashninja.pl/api/masternodes/stats), even though the site itself displays the correct amount.

It's closed. Bad/failed projects and the people that voted have nothing to do with whether or not Dash is linked to coinapult/cryptocapital/tether in the way this article describes.

In the current system I don't like the fact that a 1000-500 proposal passes but a 500-50 vote fails (although this would be very rare). But I also think in your proposed system, a 500-499 vote would pass and I think it could be detrimental to allow something to pass if it is that polarizing.

It doesn't make sense to characterize it that way. If there were 4600 MNs and there were 460 Yes votes and 1 No vote, would you say that the no vote is 460 times as powerful as the yes votes? Every yes vote makes a proposal one vote closer to passing, and every no vote makes a proposal one...

Nice sentiment, but we should leave these decisions to Dash Core Group to handle internally. They already have more than enough cash on hand to be able to do something like this should it be deemed appropriate.

Requiring the supermajority helps ensure a more decisive/unified level of support for the proposals that do pass. But to be honest, I'm not sure if this is necessary. A change like this I am sure would break along the typical political lines in dash between the MNOs that believe we need to be...

It's not centralized if there is more than one escrow option.

Why? Proposal owners that need to be paid in fiat already have options to go through escrow, and proposal owners that are willing to assume the volatility risk can submit in dash. Competition is already possible because anyone can submit a similar proposal for less cost. Why should we divert...