v0.10.15 - Onyx Release

[TaoOfSatoshi]

Do you guys need some inspiration?

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-anthem-for-inspiration.2917/

 

[Light]

Are we discussing this ShadowCash merger initiative anywhere in DCT? Please post the link if you know.

 

[jpr]

Obviously we are not.

 

[crowning]

I'll create one, give me some minutes...


Edit: done. see https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-shadowcash-merger.2918/

 

[djcrypto]

I get this error on only one of my MNs after updating:
I type "./darkcoind getinfo" and at the bottom...
"errors" : "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Is this common? I see the MN active with the updated version on drk.mn

 

[UdjinM6]

I get this error on only one of my MNs after updating:
I type "./darkcoind getinfo" and at the bottom...
"errors" : "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

Is this common? I see the MN active with the updated version on drk.mn

make sure you see correct version in getinfo output

"version" : 101519,

 

[flare]

{
"synccheckpoint" : "00000000000b97fb59660c7a9d6afe48ceb7dec255036dde35a71b4c6b8bc683",
"height" : 165660,
"timestamp" : 1415363936,
"subscribemode" : "enforce",
"enforcing" : "on"
}

 

[splawik21]

how is suchpool? they were lucky last times to be forked
so far so good

 

[UdjinM6]

3 minutes ago 165678 suchpool 3171.35 5.002 1.2505 Xc8eAgVqrj1fYMQgjnjLVgVPJZrEwff5ag

 

[moli]

how is suchpool? they were lucky last times to be forked
so far so good

Wafflepool is our best buddy now, besides Suchpool

 

[UdjinM6]

I know, but this doesn't matter: at the time of the masternode-payment (2014-11-01 21:12:03) this address did definitely NOT have a 1000 DRK vin, therefore shouldn't have gotten a payment at all.
If I remember correctly this should already have been fixed with v0.10.15.13, that's why I tagged Evan to have a closer look...

eduffield sadly it's not fixed
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/00000000001710bfbe26f92a3deebca22df4cd4ed57506f8b5dac7af47c3a4b8
Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9

 

[oblox]

eduffield sadly it's not fixed
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/00000000001710bfbe26f92a3deebca22df4cd4ed57506f8b5dac7af47c3a4b8
Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9

How is this still happening? Isn't the vin checked to make sure a 1000 is there among the reference nodes maintaining a list?

 

[UdjinM6]

How is this still happening? Isn't the vin checked to make sure a 1000 is there among the reference nodes maintaining a list?

I'm not sure... maybe we have to wait till list will go one round or smth funds are on XfqzwKGLcTU88rx33wdK8VX2gDU9XAx99V now.... I noticed this on https://drk.mn/blocks.html#blocksdetail (masternode is of Unknown version)

 

[BrainShutdown]

eduffield sadly it's not fixed
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/00000000001710bfbe26f92a3deebca22df4cd4ed57506f8b5dac7af47c3a4b8
Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9

Maybe that address was already on winners list before enforcement?...

 

[oblox]

Maybe that address was already on winners list before enforcement?...

That could be since it's what, 10 address that are in the queue right away? Thoughts eduffield

 

[UdjinM6]

Maybe that address was already on winners list before enforcement?...

this could be the answer if vins are checked only before going to winners list... let's see if there will be another one...

 

[splawik21]

this could be the answer if vins are checked only before going to winners list... let's see if there will be another one...

I wish it was the reason. Probable.

 

[UdjinM6]

I wish it was the reason. Probable.

at least he is not in the list now

> darkcoind masternode list pubkey | grep Xv5tUno57WDZ5rGxNVFU3cHJXY1PUyJMy9

gives empty result BUT vin is in the list

> darkcoind masternode list vin | grep 42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b
"54.187.163.127:9999" : "42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b",

because there was 2 outputs by 1000 DRK each
http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/42971189e74612f1cd33f75d04158d511c1b4591cf860cebee9171d4bfbd320b
could this be the issue?

EDIT: it also could correspond with the one I reported earlier

masternode list vin command output seems a bit confusing

> darkcoind masternode list vin | awk '{ print $3 }' | sort | uniq -c | sort | grep -v " 1 """

gives

      2
      9 "e1e64ffaa566c4e07a0c99c9a6aa216f1fb3a520856ef07694480d14f25e775f",

At first sight this means that 9 MNs have the same vin...
Actually in that particular example it's ok because this transaction has 9 outputs by 1000 DRKs each
http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/e1e64ffaa566c4e07a0c99c9a6aa216f1fb3a520856ef07694480d14f25e775f
I'm sure output index info is available internally so wouldn't it be better to provide it in command output too to avoid such confusions?
eduffield ?

 

[BrainShutdown]

On another note the CPU consumption reduction on 10.15.21 is really impressive.

Great work Evan! :smile:

 

[thelonecrouton]

On another note the CPU consumption reduction on 10.15.21 is really impressive.

Great work Evan! :smile:

Yes, also RAM, load, bandwidth on v21 all about halved vs. v19 for me.